512
Views
63
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Teaching science through online, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the Knowledge Integration Environment

&
Pages 839-857 | Received 01 Sep 2001, Published online: 16 Jul 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (19)

Chenn-Jung Huang, Shun-Chih Chang, Heng-Ming Chen, Jhe-Hao Tseng & Sheng-Yuan Chien. (2016) A group intelligence-based asynchronous argumentation learning-assistance platform. Interactive Learning Environments 24:7, pages 1408-1427.
Read now
Tammy Q. Tasker & Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl. (2016) Using Peer Feedback to Improve Students’ Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education 27:1, pages 35-59.
Read now
Fleur Ruth Prinsen, Jan Terwel, BonneJ.H. Zijlstra & MoniqueM.L. Volman. (2013) The effects of guided elaboration in a CSCL programme on the learning outcomes of primary school students from Dutch and immigrant families. Educational Research and Evaluation 19:1, pages 39-57.
Read now
Loucas T. Louca & Zacharias C. Zacharia. (2012) Modeling-based learning in science education: cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review 64:4, pages 471-492.
Read now
Jan van Aalst & Mya Sioux Truong. (2011) Promoting Knowledge Creation Discourse in an Asian Primary Five Classroom: Results from an inquiry into life cycles. International Journal of Science Education 33:4, pages 487-515.
Read now
T. Schellens, H. Van Keer, B. De Wever & M. Valcke. (2009) Tagging thinking types in asynchronous discussion groups: effects on critical thinking. Interactive Learning Environments 17:1, pages 77-94.
Read now
DouglasB. Clark & VictorD. Sampson. (2007) Personally‐Seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education 29:3, pages 253-277.
Read now
Jim Hewitt. (2005) Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences 14:4, pages 567-589.
Read now
Sadhana Puntambekar & Roland Hubscher. (2005) Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed?. Educational Psychologist 40:1, pages 1-12.
Read now
Christopher M. Hoadley. (2004) Methodological Alignment in Design-Based Research. Educational Psychologist 39:4, pages 203-212.
Read now
Alex J. Cuthbert & James D. Slotta. (2004) RESEARCH REPORT. International Journal of Science Education 26:7, pages 821-844.
Read now
Douglas Clark & Marcia C. Linn. (2003) Designing for Knowledge Integration: The Impact of Instructional Time. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12:4, pages 451-493.
Read now
RAVEN M. WALLACE. (2003) Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information 3:2, pages 241-280.
Read now
Marcia Linn. (2003) Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education 25:6, pages 727-758.
Read now
Elizabeth A. Davis. (2003) Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12:1, pages 91-142.
Read now
Bat-Sheva Eylon. (2000) Designing powerful learning environments and practical theories: the knowledge integration environment. International Journal of Science Education 22:8, pages 885-890.
Read now
Marcia C. Linn. (2000) Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment. International Journal of Science Education 22:8, pages 781-796.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (44)

Mariano Velamazán, Patricia Santos, Davinia Hernández-Leo & Lluís Vicent. (2023) User anonymity versus identification in computer-supported collaborative learning: Comparing learners' preferences and behaviors. Computers & Education 203, pages 104848.
Crossref
Chun Zhou & Matthew Lewis. (2021) A mobile technology‐based cooperative learning platform for undergraduate biology courses in common college classrooms. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 49:3, pages 427-440.
Crossref
Roger G. Tobin, Sara J. Lacy & Sally Crissman. (2021) Some Lessons From Elementary School Teachers’ Experiences of 3-D Science in the Time of COVID. AERA Open 7, pages 233285842110657.
Crossref
Aeran Choi & Brian Hand. (2019) Students’ Construct and Critique of Claims and Evidence Through Online Asynchronous Discussion Combined with In-Class Discussion. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18:6, pages 1023-1040.
Crossref
Tingting Wang. 2019. Pre-Service and In-Service Teacher Education. Pre-Service and In-Service Teacher Education 637 657 .
Diana Al Jahrami. 2019. English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa. English Language Teaching Research in the Middle East and North Africa 637 665 .
Michelle L. F. Cheong, Jean Y.-C. Chen & Bing Tian Dai. 2019. Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. From Theory to Practice. Advances and Trends in Artificial Intelligence. From Theory to Practice 730 743 .
L. Major, P. Warwick, I. Rasmussen, S. Ludvigsen & V. Cook. (2018) Classroom dialogue and digital technologies: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies 23:5, pages 1995-2028.
Crossref
Dermot F. Donnelly, Bahadir Namdar, Jonathan M. Vitale, Kevin Lai & Marcia C. Linn. (2016) Enhancing student explanations of evolution: Comparing elaborating and competing theory prompts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53:9, pages 1341-1363.
Crossref
C. Aaron Price, Katherine Gean, Claire G. Christensen, Elham Beheshti, Bryn Pernot, Gloria Segovia, Halcyon Person, Steven Beasley & Patricia Ward. (2015) Casual Games and Casual Learning About Human Biological Systems. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25:1, pages 111-126.
Crossref
Binbin Zheng, Mark Warschauer, Jin Kyoung Hwang & Penelope Collins. (2014) Laptop Use, Interactive Science Software, and Science Learning Among At-Risk Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology 23:4, pages 591-603.
Crossref
Ana Edite Cunha, Elisa Saraiva, Carla A. Santos, Fernanda Dinis & J. Bernardino Lopes. (2014) Teacher Mediation Actions and Students’ Productive Engagement During the Use of Computer Simulations in Physical Science Classrooms. Procedia Technology 13, pages 76-85.
Crossref
Fei Gao, Tianyi Zhang & Teresa Franklin. (2012) Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology 44:3, pages 469-483.
Crossref
Ying Liang. (2013) Based on SPSS task-driven type experimental mode effect analysis. Based on SPSS task-driven type experimental mode effect analysis.
Jennifer J. Neakrase, H. Prentice Baptiste, Ashley N. Ryan & Elsa Q. Villa. 2012. Meta-Communication for Reflective Online Conversations. Meta-Communication for Reflective Online Conversations 102 118 .
Jan van Aalst & Carol K. K. Chan. 2012. Transformative Approaches to New Technologies and Student Diversity in Futures Oriented Classrooms. Transformative Approaches to New Technologies and Student Diversity in Futures Oriented Classrooms 85 103 .
Tali Tal, Yael Kali, Stella Magid & Jacqueline J. Madhok. 2011. Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom. Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom 11 38 .
Jazlin Ebenezer, Osman Nafiz Kaya & Devairakkam Luke Ebenezer. (2010) Engaging students in environmental research projects: Perceptions of fluency with innovative technologies and levels of scientific inquiry abilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:1, pages 94-116.
Crossref
Jingyan Lu, Susanne P. Lajoie & Jeffrey Wiseman. (2010) Scaffolding problem-based learning with CSCL tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5:3, pages 283-298.
Crossref
Vanessa L. Peters & Jim Hewitt. (2010) An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses. Computers & Education 54:4, pages 951-961.
Crossref
Eva Mary Bures, Philip C. Abrami & Richard F. Schmid. (2010) Exploring whether students’ use of labelling depends upon the type of activity. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 5:1, pages 103-116.
Crossref
Szczepan W. Baran, Elizabeth J. Johnson, Matthew A. Stephens & James Kehler. (2009) Development of electronic learning courses for surgical training of animal research personnel. Lab Animal 38:9, pages 295-304.
Crossref
Fei Gao & Ralph T. Putnam. (2009) Using Research on Learning from Text to Inform Online Discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research 41:1, pages 1-37.
Crossref
Douglas ClarkMarcia C. Linn. (2017) Designing for Knowledge Integration: The Impact of Instructional Time. Journal of Education 189:1-2, pages 139-158.
Crossref
Mei-Hung Chiu & Hsin-Kai Wu. 2009. Multiple Representations in Chemical Education. Multiple Representations in Chemical Education 251 283 .
E. Michael Nussbaum. (2008) Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33:3, pages 345-359.
Crossref
Jingyan Lu & Susanne P. Lajoie. (2008) Supporting medical decision making with argumentation tools. Contemporary Educational Psychology 33:3, pages 425-442.
Crossref
Douglas B. Clark & Victor Sampson. (2007) Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45:3, pages 293-321.
Crossref
E. Michael Nussbaum, Denise L. Winsor, Yvette M. Aqui & Anne M. Poliquin. (2007) Putting the pieces together: Online argumentation vee diagrams enhance thinking during discussions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2:4, pages 479-500.
Crossref
Peggy A Ertmer & Abdelfattah Y.M Nour. (2007) Teaching Basic Medical Sciences at a Distance: Strategies for Effective Teaching and Learning in Internet-Based Courses. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 34:3, pages 316-324.
Crossref
Douglas B. Clark, Karsten Stegmann, Armin Weinberger, Muhsin Menekse & Gijsbert Erkens. 2007. Argumentation in Science Education. Argumentation in Science Education 217 243 .
Ying‐Shao Hsu. (2006) ‘Lesson Rainbow’: the use of multiple representations in an Internet‐based, discipline‐integrated science lesson. British Journal of Educational Technology 37:4, pages 539-557.
Crossref
Marcelo Giordan. (2005) O computador na Educação em Ciências: breve revisão crítica acerca de algumas formas de utilização. Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 11:2, pages 279-304.
Crossref
Ying-Shao Hsu. (2016) Using the Internet to Develop Students' Capacity for Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research 31:2, pages 137-161.
Crossref
Richard Joiner. (2004) Supporting Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7:2, pages 197-200.
Crossref
Fu-Hsiang Wei, Liang-Yi Lee & Gwo-Dong Chen. (2004) Supporting adaptive mentor by student preference within context of problem-solving learning. Supporting adaptive mentor by student preference within context of problem-solving learning.
C.K.K. Chan & J. Van Aalst. 2004. What We Know About CSCL. What We Know About CSCL 87 112 .
Beth Ann Thacker. (2003) Recent advances in classroom physics. Reports on Progress in Physics 66:10, pages 1833-1864.
Crossref
S. Davis. (2003) Observations in classrooms using a network of handheld devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19:3, pages 298-307.
Crossref
Marcia C. Linn, Douglas Clark & James D. Slotta. (2003) WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education 87:4, pages 517-538.
Crossref
Yun Ping Lim, Jan-Olov Höög, Phyllis Gardner, Shoba Ranganathan, Siv Andersson, Subramanian Subbiah, Tin Wee Tan, Winston Hide & Anthony S. Weiss. (2003) The S-star trial bioinformatics course: An on-line learning success. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 31:1, pages 20-23.
Crossref
Christopher Hoadley & Roy D. Pea. 2009. Building Virtual Communities. Building Virtual Communities 321 354 .
Alex J. Cuthbert, Douglas B. Clark & Marcia C. Linn. 2009. Building Virtual Communities. Building Virtual Communities 215 246 .
Yuan-Chen Liu, Hong-Yan Lee & Wei-Kai Wang. (2002) Mathematic guide-learning system to the misconception of elementary students. Mathematic guide-learning system to the misconception of elementary students.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.