1,269
Views
55
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The effects of metacognitive instruction embedded within an asynchronous learning network on scientific inquiry skills

, &
Pages 957-983 | Published online: 13 Mar 2011

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (11)

Mark Feng Teng. (2022) Effects of cooperative–metacognitive instruction on EFL learners’ writing and metacognitive awareness. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 42:2, pages 179-195.
Read now
Idit Adler, Michal Zion & Esther Rimerman-Shmueli. (2019) Fostering Teachers’ Reflections on the Dynamic Characteristics of Open Inquiry through Metacognitive Prompts. Journal of Science Teacher Education 30:7, pages 763-787.
Read now
Zohar Snapir, Catherine Eberbach, Orit Ben-Zvi-Assaraf, Cindy Hmelo-Silver & Jaklin Tripto. (2017) Characterising the development of the understanding of human body systems in high-school biology students – a longitudinal study. International Journal of Science Education 39:15, pages 2092-2127.
Read now
Katharina Engelmann, Birgit J. Neuhaus & Frank Fischer. (2016) Fostering scientific reasoning in education – meta-analytic evidence from intervention studies. Educational Research and Evaluation 22:5-6, pages 333-349.
Read now
Silke Rönnebeck, Sascha Bernholt & Mathias Ropohl. (2016) Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education 52:2, pages 161-197.
Read now
Marieke Van der Schaaf, Liesbeth Baartman, Frans Prins, Anne Oosterbaan & Harmen Schaap. (2013) Feedback Dialogues That Stimulate Students' Reflective Thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 57:3, pages 227-245.
Read now
Richard E. West. (2011) Insights From Research on Distance Education Learners, Learning, and Learner Support. American Journal of Distance Education 25:3, pages 135-151.
Read now
Santiago Sandi‐Urena, MelanieM. Cooper & RonH. Stevens. (2011) Enhancement of Metacognition Use and Awareness by Means of a Collaborative Intervention. International Journal of Science Education 33:3, pages 323-340.
Read now
PeterJ.N. Dejonckheere, Kristof Van De Keere & Nele Mestdagh. (2009) Training the Scientific Thinking Circle in Pre- and Primary School Children. The Journal of Educational Research 103:1, pages 1-16.
Read now
AbdullateefH. Haidar & AliK. Al Naqabi. (2008) Emiratii high school students’ understandings of stoichiometry and the influence of metacognition on their understanding. Research in Science & Technological Education 26:2, pages 215-237.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (44)

Sinem Dinçol Özgür. (2023) The effects of prospective chemistry teachers’ laboratory teaching experiences on their metacognitive thinking skills and perceptions of problem-solving skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education.
Crossref
Ozgur Kivilcan Dogan, Cigdem Han-Tosunoglu, Nevin Arslan, Mustafa Cakir & Serhat Irez. (2023) Middle School Graduates’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry and Its Relation to Academic Achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
Crossref
Rotem Maor, Rotem Levi, Zemira Mevarech, Nurit Paz-Baruch, Niv Grinshpan, Alex Milman, Sarit Shlomo & Michal Zion. (2023) Difference between zoom-based online versus classroom lesson plan performances in creativity and metacognition during COVID-19 pandemic. Learning Environments Research.
Crossref
Ralph Schumacher & Elsbeth Stern. (2023) Promoting the construction of intelligent knowledge with the help of various methods of cognitively activating instruction. Frontiers in Education 7.
Crossref
Armin Barth, Roger Deuber, Tanja Frei, Brigitte Hänger, Juraj Lipscher, Herbert Rubin, Ralph Schumacher, Irene Schürmann, Lorenz Stäheli & Adrian Zwyssig. 2022. Intelligentes Wissen – und wie man es fördert. Intelligentes Wissen – und wie man es fördert 229 255 .
Liron Schwartz, Idit Adler, Nir Madjar & Michal Zion. (2021) Rising to the Challenge: The Effect of Individual and Social Metacognitive Scaffolds on Students’ Expressions of Autonomy and Competence Throughout an Inquiry Process. Journal of Science Education and Technology 30:4, pages 582-593.
Crossref
Anita Crescenzi, Austin R. Ward, Yuan Li & Rob Capra. (2021) Supporting Metacognition during Exploratory Search with the OrgBox. Supporting Metacognition during Exploratory Search with the OrgBox.
Austin R. Ward & Robert Capra. (2021) OrgBox: Supporting Cognitive and Metacognitive Activities During Exploratory Search. OrgBox: Supporting Cognitive and Metacognitive Activities During Exploratory Search.
Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková & Renáta Orosová. (2021) FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT AS A TOOL TO ENHANCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF INQUIRY SKILLS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION. Journal of Baltic Science Education 20:2, pages 204-222.
Crossref
Sarah McLean, Ken N. Meadows, Austin Heffernan & Nicole Campbell. (2020) Using online decision trees to support students’ self-efficacy in the laboratory. Advances in Physiology Education 44:3, pages 430-435.
Crossref
Nathaly FARAH & Zalpha AYOUBİ. (2020) Enhancing the Critical Thinking Skills of Grade 8 Chemistry Students Using an Inquiry and Reflection Teaching Method. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health.
Crossref
Joni Lämsä, Raija Hämäläinen, Pekka Koskinen, Jouni Viiri & Joonas Mannonen. (2020) The potential of temporal analysis: Combining log data and lag sequential analysis to investigate temporal differences between scaffolded and non-scaffolded group inquiry-based learning processes. Computers & Education 143, pages 103674.
Crossref
Robert M. Bernard, Eugene Borokhovski, Richard F. Schmid, David I. Waddington & David I. Pickup. (2019) Twenty‐first century adaptive teaching and individualized learning operationalized as specific blends of student‐centered instructional events: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews 15:1-2.
Crossref
Idit Adler, Liron Schwartz, Nir Madjar & Michal Zion. (2018) Reading between the lines: The effect of contextual factors on student motivation throughout an open inquiry process. Science Education 102:4, pages 820-855.
Crossref
Eylem Yıldız Feyzioğlu, Ercan Akpinar & Nilgün Tatar. (2018) EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED METACOGNITIVE LEARNING PLATFORM ON STUDENTS’ MONITORING ACCURACY AND UNDERSTANDING OF ELECTRICITY. Journal of Baltic Science Education 17:1, pages 43-64.
Crossref
Shirly Avargil, Rea Lavi & Yehudit Judy Dori. 2018. Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education. Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education 33 64 .
Zemira R. Mevarech & Lianghuo Fan. 2018. Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education. Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education 261 278 .
Roel Grol, Esther-Mirjam Sent & Bregje de Vries. (2016) Participate or observe? Effects of economic classroom experiments on students’ economic literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education 32:2, pages 289-310.
Crossref
Shirly Avargil, Ornit Spektor-Levy & Michal Zion. 2017. Designing and Teaching the Secondary Science Methods Course. Designing and Teaching the Secondary Science Methods Course 53 70 .
Roel Grol, -->Esther-Mirjam Sent & Bregje de Vries. (2016) Effects of economic classroom experiments on economic knowledge and reasoning in secondary education. Thinking Skills and Creativity 22, pages 129-141.
Crossref
Feng Teng. (2016) Immediate and delayed effects of embedded metacognitive instruction on Chinese EFL students’ English writing and regulation of cognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity 22, pages 289-302.
Crossref
Zuzana Ješková, Stanislav Lukáč, Martina Hančová, Ľubomír Šnajder, Ján Guniš, Brigita Balogová & Marián Kireš. (2016) EFFICACY OF INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING IN MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS AND INFORMATICS IN RELATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENTS´ INQUIRY SKILLS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 15:5, pages 559-574.
Crossref
Idit Adler, Michal Zion & Zemira R. Mevarech. (2016) The effect of explicit environmentally oriented metacognitive guidance and peer collaboration on students' expressions of environmental literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53:4, pages 620-663.
Crossref
Hsien-Sheng Hsiao, Jyun-Chen Chen & Tzu-Chien Liu. 2016. ICT in Education in Global Context. ICT in Education in Global Context 211 227 .
Eleanor C. Sayre & Paul W. Irving. (2015) Brief, embedded, spontaneous metacognitive talk indicates thinking like a physicist. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 11:2.
Crossref
Michal Zion, Idit Adler & Zemira Mevarech. (2015) The Effect of Individual and Social Metacognitive Support on Students' Metacognitive Performances in an Online Discussion. Journal of Educational Computing Research 52:1, pages 50-87.
Crossref
Hester de Boer, Anouk S. Donker & Margaretha P. C. van der Werf. (2014) Effects of the Attributes of Educational Interventions on Students’ Academic Performance. Review of Educational Research 84:4, pages 509-545.
Crossref
Anne-Marie Hoskinson, Nichole N. Barger & Andrew P. Martin. (2014) Keys to a Successful Student‐Centered Classroom: Three Recommendations. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 95:3, pages 281-292.
Crossref
A.S. Donker, H. de Boer, D. Kostons, C.C. Dignath van Ewijk & M.P.C. van der Werf. (2014) Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 11, pages 1-26.
Crossref
Josef Künsting, Julian Kempf & Joachim Wirth. (2013) Enhancing scientific discovery learning through metacognitive support. Contemporary Educational Psychology 38:4, pages 349-360.
Crossref
Kyungbin Kwon, Ran-Young Hong & James M. Laffey. (2013) The educational impact of metacognitive group coordination in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior 29:4, pages 1271-1281.
Crossref
Sabina Eggert, Frauke Ostermeyer, Marcus Hasselhorn & Susanne Bögeholz. (2013) Socioscientific Decision Making in the Science Classroom: The Effect of Embedded Metacognitive Instructions on Students' Learning Outcomes. Education Research International 2013, pages 1-12.
Crossref
Bracha Kramarski & Tova Michalsky. 2013. International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies 35 51 .
Osnat Eldar, Bat-Sheva Eylon & Miky Ronen. 2012. Metacognition in Science Education. Metacognition in Science Education 225 250 .
정애진, LEE KIL-JAE & 주희영. (2011) The Effects of Metacognition Strategy Based on Reflective Self-Assessment on the Understanding of the Genetic Concept and Metacognition Ability of High School Students. BIOLOGY EDUCATION 39:3, pages 472-484.
Crossref
Ebru Mugaloglu & Deniz Sarıbas. (2010) Pre-service science teachers’ competence to design an inquiry based lab lesson. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2:2, pages 4255-4259.
Crossref
Robert M. BernardPhilip C. AbramiEugene BorokhovskiC. Anne WadeRana M. TamimMichael A. SurkesEdward Clement Bethel. (2009) A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education. Review of Educational Research 79:3, pages 1243-1289.
Crossref
Cho-Hee Yoon. (2009) Self-Regulated Learning and Instructional Factors in the Scientific Inquiry of Scientifically Gifted Korean Middle School Students. Gifted Child Quarterly 53:3, pages 203-216.
Crossref
Deniz Saribas & Hale Bayram. (2009) Is it possible to improve science process skills and attitudes towards chemistry through the development of metacognitive skills embedded within a motivated chemistry lab?: a self-regulated learning approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1:1, pages 61-72.
Crossref
Anat Zohar & Bracha Peled. (2008) The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low- and high-achieving students. Learning and Instruction 18:4, pages 337-353.
Crossref
Michal Zion. (2007) On line Forums as a `Rescue Net' in an Open Inquiry Process. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 6:2, pages 351-375.
Crossref
Rebecca Lippmann Kung & Cedric Linder. (2007) Metacognitive activity in the physics student laboratory: is increased metacognition necessarily better?. Metacognition and Learning 2:1, pages 41-56.
Crossref
Tova Michalsky, Michal Zion & Zemira R. Mevarech. (2016) Developing Students' Metacognitive Awareness in Asynchronous Learning Networks in Comparison to Face-to-Face Discussion Groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research 36:4, pages 395-424.
Crossref
Zemira Mevarech & Shimon Fridkin. (2006) The effects of IMPROVE on mathematical knowledge, mathematical reasoning and meta-cognition. Metacognition and Learning 1:1, pages 85-97.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.