Citations (38)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (7)
Sungwoong Lee, Fengfeng Ke & Jeeheon Ryu. (2023) Engagement and effectiveness of symbolic and iconic learning support for math problem representation: an eye tracking study. Interactive Learning Environments 31:3, pages 1514-1531.
Read now
Read now
Marc Rodemer, Julia Eckhard, Nicole Graulich & Sascha Bernholt. (2021) Connecting explanations to representations: benefits of highlighting techniques in tutorial videos on students’ learning in organic chemistry. International Journal of Science Education 43:17, pages 2707-2728.
Read now
Read now
Gunnar E. Höst & Jan Anward. (2017) Intentions and actions in molecular self-assembly: perspectives on students’ language use. International Journal of Science Education 39:6, pages 627-644.
Read now
Read now
Tiia Karpin, Kalle Juuti & Jari Lavonen. (2014) Learning to apply models of materials while explaining their properties. Research in Science & Technological Education 32:3, pages 340-351.
Read now
Read now
David M. J. Corradi, Jan Elen, Beno Schraepen & Geraldine Clarebout. (2014) Understanding Possibilities and Limitations of Abstract Chemical Representations for Achieving Conceptual Understanding. International Journal of Science Education 36:5, pages 715-734.
Read now
Read now
Vahide Taskin & Sascha Bernholt. (2014) Students' Understanding of Chemical Formulae: A review of empirical research. International Journal of Science Education 36:1, pages 157-185.
Read now
Read now
Vicente Talanquer. (2011) Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education 33:2, pages 179-195.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (31)
Büşra Tonyali, Mathias Ropohl & Julia Schwanewedel. (2023) What makes representations good representations for science education? A teacher-oriented summary of significant findings and a practical guideline for the transfer into teaching. Chemistry Teacher International 0:0.
Crossref
Crossref
Vicente Talanquer. (2022) The Complexity of Reasoning about and with Chemical Representations. JACS Au 2:12, pages 2658-2669.
Crossref
Crossref
Catherine Houdement, Cécile Hosson & Christophe HacheKarine BÉCU‐ROBINAULT. 2022. Semiotic Approaches in Science Didactics. Semiotic Approaches in Science Didactics
173
208
.
Yilmaz Soysal & Ozgul Yilmaz-Tuzun. (2019) Relationships Between Teacher Discursive Moves and Middle School Students’ Cognitive Contributions to Science Concepts. Research in Science Education 51:S1, pages 325-367.
Crossref
Crossref
Vanessa Figueiredo De Andrade, Sofia Freire & Mónica Baptista. (2021) Constructing Scientific Explanations for Chemical Phenomena through Drawings among 8th-grade Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17:1, pages em1937.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael Macrie-Shuck & Vicente Talanquer. (2020) Exploring Students’ Explanations of Energy Transfer and Transformation. Journal of Chemical Education 97:12, pages 4225-4234.
Crossref
Crossref
Sigal Samon & Sharona T. Levy. (2019) Interactions between reasoning about complex systems and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57:1, pages 58-86.
Crossref
Crossref
Ines Nuić & Saša Aleksej Glažar. (2019) The Effect of e-Learning Strategy at Primary School Level on Understanding Structure and States of Matter. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Nicole Baldwin & MaryKay Orgill. (2019) Relationship between teaching assistants’ perceptions of student learning challenges and their use of external representations when teaching acid–base titrations in introductory chemistry laboratory courses. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 20:4, pages 821-836.
Crossref
Crossref
Jill D. Maroo & Sara L. Johnson. 2018. Towards a Framework for Representational Competence in Science Education. Towards a Framework for Representational Competence in Science Education
247
262
.
Sigal Samon & Sharona T. Levy. (2017) Micro-macro compatibility: When does a complex systems approach strongly benefit science learning?. Science Education 101:6, pages 985-1014.
Crossref
Crossref
Halil Tümay. (2016) Emergence, Learning Difficulties, and Misconceptions in Chemistry Undergraduate Students’ Conceptualizations of Acid Strength. Science & Education 25:1-2, pages 21-46.
Crossref
Crossref
Halil Tümay. (2016) Reconsidering learning difficulties and misconceptions in chemistry: emergence in chemistry and its implications for chemical education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 17:2, pages 229-245.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefan M. Irby, Andy L. Phu, Emily J. Borda, Todd R. Haskell, Nicole Steed & Zachary Meyer. (2016) Use of a card sort task to assess students' ability to coordinate three levels of representation in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 17:2, pages 337-352.
Crossref
Crossref
James M. Nyachwaya & Merry Gillaspie. (2016) Features of representations in general chemistry textbooks: a peek through the lens of the cognitive load theory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 17:1, pages 58-71.
Crossref
Crossref
David Corradi, Geraldine Clarebout & Jan Elen. (2015) Cognitive Dissonance as an Instructional Tool for Understanding Chemical Representations. Journal of Science Education and Technology 24:5, pages 684-695.
Crossref
Crossref
Edson José Wartha & Daisy de Brito Rezende. (2015) A elaboração conceitual em química orgânica na perspectiva da semiótica Peirceana. Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 21:1, pages 49-64.
Crossref
Crossref
David Corradi, Dawit Tibebu Trinenuh, Geraldine Clarebout & Jan Elen. (2014) How Multiple External Representations Can Help or Constrain Learning in Science. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 13:3, pages 411-423.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith S. Taber. (2014) The significance of implicit knowledge for learning and teaching chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:4, pages 447-461.
Crossref
Crossref
Deborah G. Herrington & Patrick L. Daubenmire. 2014. Tools of Chemistry Education Research. Tools of Chemistry Education Research
31
59
.
Vickie M. Williamson. 2014. Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom. Learning with Understanding in the Chemistry Classroom
193
208
.
Birgitta Frändberg, Per Lincoln & Anita Wallin. (2013) Linguistic Resources Used in Grade 8 Students’ Submicro Level Explanations—Science Items from TIMSS 2007. Research in Science Education 43:6, pages 2387-2406.
Crossref
Crossref
Mike Stieff, Minjung Ryu & Jason C. Yip. (2013) Speaking across levels – generating and addressing levels confusion in discourse. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 14:4, pages 376-389.
Crossref
Crossref
Marc H. W. van Mil, Dirk Jan Boerwinkel & Arend Jan Waarlo. (2011) Modelling Molecular Mechanisms: A Framework of Scientific Reasoning to Construct Molecular-Level Explanations for Cellular Behaviour. Science & Education 22:1, pages 93-118.
Crossref
Crossref
Hannah Sevian & Marilyne Stains. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
69
94
.
Georgios Tsaparlis & Hannah Sevian. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
485
520
.
Marijn R. Meijer, Astrid M. W. Bulte & Albert Pilot. 2013. Concepts of Matter in Science Education. Concepts of Matter in Science Education
419
436
.
David Corradi, Jan Elen & Geraldine Clarebout. (2012) Understanding and Enhancing the Use of Multiple External Representations in Chemistry Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 21:6, pages 780-795.
Crossref
Crossref
Guilherme A. Marson & Bayardo B. Torres. (2011) Fostering Multirepresentational Levels of Chemical Concepts: A Framework To Develop Educational Software. Journal of Chemical Education 88:12, pages 1616-1622.
Crossref
Crossref
Mike Stieff. (2011) Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:10, pages 1137-1158.
Crossref
Crossref
Guo-Li Chiou & O. Roger Anderson. (2010) A study of undergraduate physics students' understanding of heat conduction based on mental model theory and an ontology-process analysis. Science Education 94:5, pages 825-854.
Crossref
Crossref