Citations (37)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (7)
Andrea Kunze & Jennifer G. Cromley. (2021) Deciding on drawing: the topic matters when using drawing as a science learning strategy. International Journal of Science Education 43:4, pages 624-640.
Read now
Read now
Su Lynn Tay & Jennifer Yeo. (2018) Analysis of a physics teacher's pedagogical ‘micro-actions’ that support 17-year-olds’ learning of free body diagrams via a modelling approach. International Journal of Science Education 40:2, pages 109-138.
Read now
Read now
Eric Kuo, Nicole R. Hallinen & Luke D. Conlin. (2017) When procedures discourage insight: epistemological consequences of prompting novice physics students to construct force diagrams. International Journal of Science Education 39:7, pages 814-839.
Read now
Read now
Gita Taasoobshirazi, MarLynn Bailey & John Farley. (2015) Physics Metacognition Inventory Part II: Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education 37:17, pages 2769-2786.
Read now
Read now
Jennifer Yeo & John K. Gilbert. (2014) Constructing a Scientific Explanation—A Narrative Account. International Journal of Science Education 36:11, pages 1902-1935.
Read now
Read now
Gita Taasoobshirazi & John Farley. (2013) Construct Validation of the Physics Metacognition Inventory. International Journal of Science Education 35:3, pages 447-459.
Read now
Read now
MitchellJ. Nathan. (2012) Rethinking Formalisms in Formal Education. Educational Psychologist 47:2, pages 125-148.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (30)
Eric Kuo. 2023. The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Learning Physics. The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Learning Physics
10-1
10-26
.
Alexandru Maries & Chandralekha Singh. (2023) Helping Students Become Proficient Problem Solvers Part I: A Brief Review. Education Sciences 13:2, pages 156.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandru Maries & Chandralekha Singh. (2023) Helping Students Become Proficient Problem Solvers Part II: An Example from Waves. Education Sciences 13:2, pages 138.
Crossref
Crossref
Dana Miller‐Cotto, Julie L. Booth & Nora S. Newcombe. (2022) Sketching and verbal self‐explanation: Do they help middle school children solve science problems?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 36:4, pages 919-935.
Crossref
Crossref
Sumiaki NAKANO. (2022) A Case Survey of Students’ Diagram-drawing Performance in Solving Physics Problems物理学的問題処理における作図パフォーマンスの事例調査. Journal of Research in Science Education 62:3, pages 667-673.
Crossref
Crossref
Barbara Chiu, Christopher Randles & Stefan Irby. (2022) Analyzing Student Problem-Solving With MAtCH. Frontiers in Education 6.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael Vignal & Bethany R. Wilcox. (2022) Investigating unprompted and prompted diagrams generated by physics majors during problem solving. Physical Review Physics Education Research 18:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Kern Qi, David Borland, Emily Brunsen, James Minogue & Tabitha C. Peck. (2021) The Impact of Prior Knowledge on the Effectiveness of Haptic and Visual Modalities for Teaching Forces. The Impact of Prior Knowledge on the Effectiveness of Haptic and Visual Modalities for Teaching Forces.
Argenta M. Price, Candice J. Kim, Eric W. Burkholder, Amy V. Fritz & Carl E. Wieman. (2021) A Detailed Characterization of the Expert Problem-Solving Process in Science and Engineering: Guidance for Teaching and Assessment. CBE—Life Sciences Education 20:3, pages ar43.
Crossref
Crossref
E. W. Burkholder, J. K. Miles, T. J. Layden, K. D. Wang, A. V. Fritz & C. E. Wieman. (2020) Template for teaching and assessment of problem solving in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research 16:1.
Crossref
Crossref
William Lo & Robert J. Beichner. (2019) Stick With It! Helping Students Understand Free-Body Diagrams – A Magnet Activity as a Tool for Understanding. The Physics Teacher 57:7, pages 459-461.
Crossref
Crossref
Luke D. Conlin, Eric Kuo & Nicole R. Hallinen. (2019) How null results can be significant for physics education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research 15:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Gulbin Ozkan & Unsal Umdu Topsakal. (2019) Science and non-science teachers’ interpretation of physics diagrammes. South African Journal of Education 39:1, pages 1-11.
Crossref
Crossref
Ana Susac, Andreja Bubic, Maja Planinic, Marko Movre & Marijan Palmovic. (2019) Role of diagrams in problem solving: An evaluation of eye-tracking parameters as a measure of visual attention. Physical Review Physics Education Research 15:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandru Maries & Chandralekha Singh. (2018) Case of two electrostatics problems: Can providing a diagram adversely impact introductory physics students’ problem solving performance?. Physical Review Physics Education Research 14:1.
Crossref
Crossref
J Sirait, Hamdani & S Mursyid. (2018) Students’ understanding of forces: Force diagrams on horizontal and inclined plane. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 997, pages 012030.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandru Maries & Chandralekha Singh. (2018) Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatics problems. European Journal of Physics 39:1, pages 015703.
Crossref
Crossref
Albert Lee. (2017) Helping Students Draw Correct Free-Body Diagrams. The Physics Teacher 55:8, pages 485-487.
Crossref
Crossref
Daryl McPadden & Eric Brewe. (2017) Impact of the second semester University Modeling Instruction course on students’ representation choices. Physical Review Physics Education Research 13:2.
Crossref
Crossref
N. G. Holmes, Dhaneesh Kumar & D. A. Bonn. (2017) Toolboxes and handing students a hammer: The effects of cueing and instruction on getting students to think critically. Physical Review Physics Education Research 13:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Zhongzhou Chen, Neset Demirci, Youn-Jeng Choi & David E. Pritchard. (2017) To draw or not to draw? Examining the necessity of problem diagrams using massive open online course experiments. Physical Review Physics Education Research 13:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Andinisa Rahmaniar, Heni Rusnayati & Asep Sutiadi. Identification of high school students’ ability level of constructing free body diagrams to solve restricted and structured response items in force matter. Identification of high school students’ ability level of constructing free body diagrams to solve restricted and structured response items in force matter.
Ismail Yilmaz. (2016) The use of problem-solving techniques to develop semiotic declarative knowledge models about magnetism and their role in learning for prospective science teachers. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies 8:8, pages 97-109.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert Semmens. (2016) Inventing the Precedence Diagram as Preparation for Future Learning. Inventing the Precedence Diagram as Preparation for Future Learning.
Elizabeth Gire & Edward Price. (2015) Structural features of algebraic quantum notations. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 11:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Andrew F. Heckler & Thomas M. Scaife. (2015) Adding and subtracting vectors: The problem with the arrow representation. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 11:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Elizabeth Gire & Edward Price. (2014) Arrows as anchors: An analysis of the material features of electric field vector arrows. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 10:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Antti Savinainen, Asko Mäkynen, Pasi Nieminen & Jouni Viiri. (2013) Does using a visual-representation tool foster students’ ability to identify forces and construct free-body diagrams?. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 9:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Leslie J. Atkins. (2012) Peer Assessment with Online Tools to Improve Student Modeling. The Physics Teacher 50:8, pages 489-493.
Crossref
Crossref
Andrew F. Heckler. 2011.
227
267
.