Citations (22)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Rola Khishfe, Fahad S. Alshaya, Saouma BouJaoude, Nasser Mansour & Khalid I. Alrudiyan. (2017) Students’ understandings of nature of science and their arguments in the context of four socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education 39:3, pages 299-334.
Read now
Read now
Yu-Ren Lin & Jeng-Fung Hung. (2016) The analysis and reconciliation of students’ rebuttals in argumentation activities. International Journal of Science Education 38:1, pages 130-155.
Read now
Read now
Pinar Seda Cetin, Nihal Dogan & Ali Yigit Kutluca. (2014) The Quality of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation: Influence of Content Knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education 25:3, pages 309-331.
Read now
Read now
Chan-Choong Foong & Esther
G.S. Daniel. (2013) Students’ Argumentation Skills across Two Socio-Scientific Issues in a Confucian Classroom: Is transfer possible?. International Journal of Science Education 35:14, pages 2331-2355.
Read now
Read now
Rola Khishfe. (2012) Nature of Science and Decision-Making. International Journal of Science Education 34:1, pages 67-100.
Read now
Read now
Kai-Yu Tang, Tzu-Chiang Lin & Ying-Shao Hsu. Status and trends of socioscientific issues in educational literature: insights and extensions from a co-word analysis. International Journal of Science Education 0:0, pages 1-25.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (16)
Hicran ÖZKUL. (2022) Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sosyobilimsel konulara yönelik tutum ve görüşlerinin incelenmesiExamination of attitudes and opinions of primary school teacher candidates towards socioscientific issues. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 25:47, pages 21-39.
Crossref
Crossref
Faisal & Sonya N. Martin. (2022) Exploring Indonesian Biology Teachers’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Instruction. Asia-Pacific Science Education 8:1, pages 256-291.
Crossref
Crossref
Chih-Ming Chen & Han-Wen Tsao. (2021) An instant perspective comparison system to facilitate learners’ discussion effectiveness in an online discussion process. Computers & Education 164, pages 104037.
Crossref
Crossref
Fatih AYDIN & Yavuz SİLİK. (2020) Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının 2017 Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretim Programı 3. ve 4. Sınıf Kazanımları Kapsamında Sosyo-Bilimsel Konuları Nasıl İlişkilendirdiklerinin İncelenmesiAn investigation of How Pre-service Elementary School Teachers Relate Socio-Scientific Issues in the Scope of Learning Outcomes of 2017 Science Education Curriculum (Grade 3 and 4). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 21:2, pages 740-756.
Crossref
Crossref
Esra Capkinoglu, Serkan Yilmaz & Gulsen Leblebicioglu. (2019) Quality of argumentation by seventh‐graders in local socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57:6, pages 827-855.
Crossref
Crossref
Vaille Dawson & Katherine Carson. (2018) Introducing Argumentation About Climate Change Socioscientific Issues in a Disadvantaged School. Research in Science Education 50:3, pages 863-883.
Crossref
Crossref
Ayşe Öztürk & Ahmet Doğanay. (2019) Development of Argumentation Skills through Socioscientific Issues in Science Course: A Collaborative Action Research. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, pages 52-89.
Crossref
Crossref
Elie Rached. (2018) Les modes de raisonnement informel des élèves de lycée lors de prises de décision en classe sur une question socio-scientifique1Higher secondary students’ informal reasoning modes during classroom decision-making on a socio-scientific issue. Recherches en éducation:32.
Crossref
Crossref
Yu Chen & Winnie Wing Mui So. (2017) An investigation of mainland china high school biology teachers’ attitudes toward and ethical reasoning of three controversial bioethics issues. Asia-Pacific Science Education 3:1.
Crossref
Crossref
김영현, 정영란 & 이은항. (2017) Analysis of High School Student's Value Judgement and Patterns of Change in Decision-Making on Socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 21:5, pages 498-511.
Crossref
Crossref
Ayşe Öztürk. (2017) An investigation of prospective science teachers' socio-scientific argumentation processes in terms of metacognition: A causal-comparative study. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi 7:4, pages 547-582.
Crossref
Crossref
Ali Yigit KUTLUCA & Abdullah AYDIN. (2017) Fen Bilimleri Öğretmen Adaylarının Sosyobilimsel Argümantasyon Kalitelerinin İncelenmesi: Konu Bağlamının Etkisi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, pages 458-480.
Crossref
Crossref
Sihan Xiao & William A. Sandoval. (2017) Associations Between Attitudes Towards Science and Children’s Evaluation of Information About Socioscientific Issues. Science & Education 26:3-4, pages 247-269.
Crossref
Crossref
Yoonsook Chung, Jungsook Yoo, Sung-Won Kim, Hyunju Lee & Dana L. Zeidler. (2014) ENHANCING STUDENTS’ COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN THE SCIENCE CLASSROOM THROUGH SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14:1, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Crossref
Hunkoog Jho. (2015) A Literature Review of Studies on Decision-making in Socio-scientific Issues. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 35:5, pages 791-804.
Crossref
Crossref
Ana M. Domènech & Conxita Márquez. 2014. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education
71
84
.