6,597
Views
149
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Reports

Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science

&
Pages 7-26 | Published online: 11 Jan 2011

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (29)

Pey-Tee Emily Oon & R. Subramaniam. (2023) Gender differences in attitudes towards science: comparison of middle school students in England, Singapore and USA using complete TIMSS 2011 data. Research in Science & Technological Education 0:0, pages 1-20.
Read now
T. Zamalloa & J. Sanz. (2023) Attitudes of secondary school students towards geology in Spain. Research in Science & Technological Education 41:1, pages 123-146.
Read now
Radu Bogdan Toma, Martha Lucía Orozco-Gómez, Alba Carolina Molano Niño, Nadia Lucía Obando-Correal & Rocío Stella Suárez Román. (2022) Testing assumptions of the Draw-a-Scientist-Test (DAST): do stereotyped views affect career aspirations?. International Journal of Science Education 44:16, pages 2423-2441.
Read now
Svein Sjøberg & Edgar Jenkins. (2022) PISA: a political project and a research agenda. Studies in Science Education 58:1, pages 1-14.
Read now
Shaohui Chi, Zuhao Wang & Xiufeng Liu. (2021) Moderating effects of teacher feedback on the associations among inquiry-based science practices and students’ science-related attitudes and beliefs. International Journal of Science Education 43:14, pages 2426-2456.
Read now
Ayşegül Altun & Ömür Kaya Kalkan. (2021) Cross-national study on students and school factors affecting science literacy. Educational Studies 47:4, pages 403-421.
Read now
Tian Luo, Jian Wang, Xiufeng Liu & Jiangping Zhou. (2019) Development and application of a scale to measure students’ STEM continuing motivation. International Journal of Science Education 41:14, pages 1885-1904.
Read now
Xiaowei Xuan, Qingna Jin, Injeong Jo, Yushan Duan & Mijung Kim. (2019) The Potential Contribution of Geography Curriculum to Scientific Literacy. Journal of Geography 118:5, pages 185-196.
Read now
Anastasios Karakolidis, Vasiliki Pitsia & Anastassios Emvalotis. (2019) The case of high motivation and low achievement in science: what is the role of students’ epistemic beliefs?. International Journal of Science Education 41:11, pages 1457-1474.
Read now
Yan Wang, Jari Lavonen & Kirsi Tirri. (2019) An assessment of how scientific literacy-related aims are actualised in the National Primary Science curricula in China and Finland. International Journal of Science Education 41:11, pages 1435-1456.
Read now
Julia Kelemen-Finan, Martin Scheuch & Silvia Winter. (2018) Contributions from citizen science to science education: an examination of a biodiversity citizen science project with schools in Central Europe. International Journal of Science Education 40:17, pages 2078-2098.
Read now
Renata Bellová, Danica Melicherčíková & Peter Tomčík. (2018) Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects. Research in Science & Technological Education 36:2, pages 226-242.
Read now
ShaoHui Chi, Zuhao Wang, Xiufeng Liu & Lei Zhu. (2017) Associations among attitudes, perceived difficulty of learning science, gender, parents’ occupation and students’ scientific competencies. International Journal of Science Education 39:16, pages 2171-2188.
Read now
Esther Agunbiade, Kenneth Ngcoza, Kavish Jawahar & Joyce Sewry. (2017) An Exploratory Study of the Relationship between Learners’ Attitudes Towards Learning Science and Characteristics of an Afterschool Science Club. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 21:3, pages 271-281.
Read now
Yasmine H. El Masri, Jo-Anne Baird & Art Graesser. (2016) Language effects in international testing: the case of PISA 2006 science items. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 23:4, pages 427-455.
Read now
Marianela Navarro, Carla Förster, Caterina González & Paulina González-Pose. (2016) Attitudes toward science: measurement and psychometric properties of the Test of Science-Related Attitudes for its use in Spanish-speaking classrooms. International Journal of Science Education 38:9, pages 1459-1482.
Read now
Jiyeong Mun, Kongju Mun & Sung-Won Kim. (2015) Exploration of Korean Students’ Scientific Imagination Using the Scientific Imagination Inventory. International Journal of Science Education 37:13, pages 2091-2112.
Read now
F. Alivernini & S. Manganelli. (2015) Country, School and Students Factors Associated with Extreme Levels of Science Literacy Across 25 Countries. International Journal of Science Education 37:12, pages 1992-2012.
Read now
Chun-Yen Tsai. (2015) Improving Students' PISA Scientific Competencies Through Online Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education 37:2, pages 321-339.
Read now
Amanda Woods-McConney, Mary Colette Oliver, Andrew McConney, Renato Schibeci & Dorit Maor. (2014) Science Engagement and Literacy: A retrospective analysis for students in Canada and Australia. International Journal of Science Education 36:10, pages 1588-1608.
Read now
Marion Händel, Xiaoju Duan, Margaret Sutherland & Albert Ziegler. (2014) Successful in Science Education and Still Popular: A pattern that is possible in China rather than in Germany or Russia. International Journal of Science Education 36:6, pages 887-907.
Read now
Maria Andrée & Lena Hansson. (2013) Marketing the ‘Broad Line’: Invitations to STEM education in a Swedish recruitment campaign. International Journal of Science Education 35:1, pages 147-166.
Read now
Danhui Zhang & Todd Campbell. (2012) An Exploration of the Potential Impact of the Integrated Experiential Learning Curriculum in Beijing, China. International Journal of Science Education 34:7, pages 1093-1123.
Read now
Rolf Vegar Olsen & Svein Lie. (2011) Profiles of Students’ Interest in Science Issues around the World: Analysis of data from PISA 2006. International Journal of Science Education 33:1, pages 97-120.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (120)

Sebastian Stuppan, Katrin Bölsterli Bardy, Andrea Maria Schmid & Markus Wilhelm. (2023) Überschätzen die Lehrmittelautor:innen den authentischen Lebensweltbezug von MINT-Aufgaben? Eine Studie zur LernendenperspektiveDo Authors of Teaching Materials Overestimate the Authenticity of STEM Tasks’ Relationship to Daily Life? A Study From the Learner Perspective. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 29:1.
Crossref
Esther UlitzschOliver LüdtkeAlexander Robitzsch. (2023) The Role of Response Style Adjustments in Cross‐Country Comparisons—A Case Study Using Data from the PISA 2015 Questionnaire. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 42:3, pages 65-79.
Crossref
Azizul Ghofar Candra Wicaksono & Erzsébet Korom. (2023) Role of inductive reasoning, gender, learning satisfaction, and educational and career preference in predicting scientific competency in high school. Thinking Skills and Creativity 49, pages 101376.
Crossref
Vojtěch Žák & Petr Kolář. (2023) Physics curriculum in upper secondary schools: What leading physicists want. Science Education 107:3, pages 677-712.
Crossref
Georgios Stylos, Olga Siarka & Konstantinos T. Kotsis. (2023) Assessing Greek pre-service primary teachers’ scientific literacy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11:2, pages 271-282.
Crossref
Hunkoog Jho. 2023. The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Special Topics. The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Special Topics 7-1 7-22 .
Marie Hornberger, Arne Bewersdorff & Claudia Nerdel. (2023) What do university students know about Artificial Intelligence? Development and validation of an AI literacy test. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 5, pages 100165.
Crossref
Marianne LoganMarianne Logan. 2023. Young People’s Voice in School Science. Young People’s Voice in School Science 165 183 .
Marianne LoganMarianne Logan. 2023. Young People’s Voice in School Science. Young People’s Voice in School Science 9 37 .
Maura A. E. Pilotti, Khadija El Alaoui & Gaydaa Al-Zohbi. (2022) What Are Male and Female Students’ Views of Science in a Society in Transition? A Self-Study of an Institution of Higher Education. Education Sciences 12:12, pages 920.
Crossref
Hanna Velling, Jan Christoph Schubert & Nick Naujoks-Schober. (2022) Beliefs angehender Lehrpersonen zum Experimentieren im Geographieunterricht: Entwicklung und Pilotierung eines FragebogensProspective Teacher’s Beliefs Towards Experimenting in Geography Class: Development and Piloting of a Questionnaire. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 28:1.
Crossref
María José Carreño, Juan C. Castro-Alonso & María José Gallardo. (2021) Interest in Physics After Experimental Activities with a Mobile Application: Gender Differences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 20:8, pages 1841-1857.
Crossref
Meryem Nur. (2022) Examining the Primary School Teacher Candidates’ Science Learning Skills in Terms of Their Attitudes Towards Science and Their Science Teaching Self-Efficacy Beliefs. International Journal of Educational Methodology 8:4, pages 853-864.
Crossref
Benjamin Lira, Joseph M. O’Brien, Pablo A. Peña, Brian M. Galla, Sidney D’Mello, David S. Yeager, Amy Defnet, Tim Kautz, Kate Munkacsy & Angela L. Duckworth. (2022) Large studies reveal how reference bias limits policy applications of self-report measures. Scientific Reports 12:1.
Crossref
Azize Sultan KÖMÜRCÜ & Ayse YENİLMEZ TÜRKOĞLU. (2022) Fen Bilimleri Ders Kitaplarındaki Soruların PISA’da Tanımlanan Fen Okuryazarlığı Yeterlik Düzeylerine Göre İncelenmesiExamining the Tasks in Science Textbooks in Terms of Levels of Proficiency for Scientific Literacy Defined in PISA. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 22:3, pages 1001-1025.
Crossref
Seher ESEN & Menşure ALKIŞ KÜÇÜKAYDIN. (2022) İlkokul Öğrencileri İçin Fen Maliyet Algısı Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlama Çalışması. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal 51:2, pages 1233-1251.
Crossref
L. H. Montes, R. A. Ferreira & C. Rodríguez. (2022) The attitude to learning chemistry instrument (ALChI): linking sex, achievement, and attitudes. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23:3, pages 686-697.
Crossref
Radu Bogdan Toma & Norman G. Lederman. (2020) A Comprehensive Review of Instruments Measuring Attitudes Toward Science. Research in Science Education 52:2, pages 567-582.
Crossref
Kwok-Chi Lau & Sui-Chu Esther Ho. (2020) Attitudes Towards Science, Teaching Practices, and Science Performance in PISA 2015: Multilevel Analysis of the Chinese and Western Top Performers. Research in Science Education 52:2, pages 415-426.
Crossref
Hadi Suwono, Lailil Maulidia, Muhammad Saefi, Sentot Kusairi & Chokchai Yuenyong. (2022) The Development and Validation of an Instrument of Prospective Science Teachers’ Perceptions of Scientific Literacy. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 18:1, pages em2068.
Crossref
Cody Ding. (2022) Examining the context of better science literacy outcomes among U.S. schools using visual analytics: A machine learning approach. International Journal of Educational Research Open 3, pages 100191.
Crossref
José Luís Araújo, Carla Morais & João Carlos Paiva. (2021) STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS SCIENCE: THE CONTRIBUTION OF A CITIZEN SCIENCE PROJECT FOR MONITORING COASTAL WATER QUALITY AND (MICRO)PLASTICS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 20:6, pages 881-893.
Crossref
Cara Broß, Carolin Enzingmüller, Ilka Parchmann & Gerhard Schmidt. (2021) Teaching Magnetoelectric Sensing to Secondary School Students—Considerations for Educational STEM Outreach. Sensors 21:21, pages 7354.
Crossref
Stephan Napierala, Fatma Batur & Torsten Brinda. (2021) What do Students Want to Know About the Digital World?. What do Students Want to Know About the Digital World?.
Effrat Akiri, Hrisilda Matathia Tor & Yehudit Judy Dori. (2021) Teaching and Assessment Methods: STEM Teachers’ Perceptions and Implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17:6, pages em1969.
Crossref
Martin H. Smith, Woutrina A. Smith & Cheryl L. Meehan. (2021) 4-H youth advance biosecurity at home and in their communities. California Agriculture 75:1, pages 33-39.
Crossref
Ronnel B. King, Yuyang Cai & Hongfei Du. (2020) Societal‐level utility value strengthens the relationship between student‐level utility value and achievement: A person‐culture fit perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology 91:1, pages 328-346.
Crossref
W P Surya & I S Arty. (2021) Students’ attitudes toward chemistry based on their learning experiences. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1806:1, pages 012178.
Crossref
Safwatun Nida, Vita Ria Mustikasari & Ingo Eilks. (2021) Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Science Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 17:1, pages em1932.
Crossref
Wahyu Budi Sabtiawan, Elok Sudibyo, Aris Rudi Purnomo, Dhita Ayu Permata Sari, Mohammad Budiyanto & Beni Setiawan. (2021) Junior High School Student’s Contagion Literacy: How far students understand Covid-19 Symptoms?. E3S Web of Conferences 328, pages 06009.
Crossref
Esra KABATAŞ MEMİŞ, Büşra Nur ÇAKAN AKKAŞ, Zehra Esra KETENOĞLU KAYABAŞI, Esma KARAKUŞ & Nurullah FİLİZ. (2020) Determining 1st– 4th Grade Elementary School Students’ Perceptions of Scientists. Acta Didactica Napocensia 13:2, pages 316-331.
Crossref
Claudia Haagen-Schützenhöfer & Martin Hopf. (2020) Design-based research as a model for systematic curriculum development: The example of a curriculum for introductory optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research 16:2.
Crossref
Gito Hadiprayitno, A Wahab Jufri & Siti Syifa’un Nufus. (2020) Mapping of Students' Scientific Literacy Skills at Mataram. SEJ (Science Education Journal) 4:2, pages 99-111.
Crossref
I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan. (2020) The changes in attitudes of 15-year-old Australian students towards reading, mathematics and science and their impact on student performance. Australian Journal of Education 64:3, pages 304-327.
Crossref
Regina Soobard, Tormi Kotkas, Jack Holbrook & Miia Rannikmae. (2020) Students’ Perceptions of an Intervention Course Designed to Raise Science-Related Career Awareness. European Journal of Educational Research 9:4, pages 1539-1555.
Crossref
Haryanto, Abu Bakar & Aulia Sanova. (2020) GUIDED INQUIRY: HOW TO IMPROVE SCIENTIFIC LITERACY STUDENT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8:4, pages 720-727.
Crossref
Mustafa YILDIZ, Eda ERDAŞ KARTAL & Günkut MESCİ. (2020) Investigation of Turkey's PISA 2015 Science Achievement and Associated Variables Using Hierarchical Linear ModelingTürkiye'nin PISA 2015 Fen Başarısının ve İlişkili Değişkenlerin Hiyerarşik Doğrusal Modelleme İle İncelenmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi 14:1, pages 450-480.
Crossref
Chun‐Yen Tsai, Huann‐shyang Lin & Shu‐Chiu Liu. (2019) The effect of pedagogical GAME model on students' PISA scientific competencies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36:3, pages 359-369.
Crossref
R D Hardianti & I U Wusqo. (2020) Fostering students’ scientific literacy and communication through the development of collaborative-guided inquiry handbook of green chemistry experiments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1567:2, pages 022059.
Crossref
Sarwi, Alim, S Fathonah & B Subali. (2020) The analysis of ethnoscience-based science literacy and character development using guided inquiry model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1567:2, pages 022045.
Crossref
Yong Zhao. (2020) Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change 21:2, pages 245-266.
Crossref
D M Venessa, Hernani & H S Halimatul. (2020) Pre-service chemistry teachers’ learning obstacles in understanding the relationship between the chemical structures and physicochemical properties of ionic liquids. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1521:4, pages 042065.
Crossref
H K Muchtar, Nahadi & Hernani. (2020) Evaluation of chemical literacy assessment instruments in solution materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1521:4, pages 042061.
Crossref
Imme Petersen, Stephanie Herzog, Corinna Bath & André Fleißner. (2020) Contextualisation of factual knowledge in genetics: A pre- and post- survey of undergraduates’ understanding of the Nature of Science. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education 16:2.
Crossref
N C Nugraheni & Paidi. (2020) Scientific literacy profile of X grade students in Gunungkidul on Biology reviewed based on gender. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1440:1, pages 012070.
Crossref
Marianne Logan. 2020. Research Handbook on Childhoodnature. Research Handbook on Childhoodnature 1181 1208 .
Hüseyin Cihan BOZDAĞ. (2019) 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Fen Bilimlerine Yönelik Motivasyonları, Tutumları ve Fen Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkiInvestigation Of The Effects Of Fifth-Grade Students’ Motivation And Attitudes Towards Science On Science Achievement. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 15:3, pages 720-740.
Crossref
Gavin W. Fulmer, Hongjia Ma & Ling L. Liang. (2019) Middle school student attitudes toward science, and their relationships with instructional practices: a survey of Chinese students’ preferred versus actual instruction. Asia-Pacific Science Education 5:1.
Crossref
Salonen, Kärkkäinen & Keinonen. (2019) Teachers Co-Designing and Implementing Career-Related Instruction. Education Sciences 9:4, pages 255.
Crossref
Ryan Summers & Fouad Abd‐El‐Khalick. (2019) An exploration of Illinois students' attitudes toward science using multivariate multilevel modeling with a cross‐sectional sample of responses from grades 5 through 10. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56:8, pages 1106-1134.
Crossref
Liu Huang, Fan Huang, Pey Tee Oon & Miranda Chi Kuan Mak. (2019) Constructs Evaluation of Student Attitudes towards Science. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 15:12.
Crossref
Münevver İLGÜN DİBEK. (2019) Examination of the Extreme Response Style of Students using IRTree: The Case of TIMSS 2015Examination of the Extreme Response Style of Students using IRTree: The Case of TIMSS 2015. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 6:2, pages 300-313.
Crossref
Esra Açikgül Firat & Mustafa Serdar Köksal. (2019) Effects of instruction supported by web 2.0 tools on prospective teachers' biotechnology literacy. Computers & Education 135, pages 61-74.
Crossref
Peter Pany, Agnes Lörnitzo, Lisa Auleitner, Christine Heidinger, Peter Lampert & Michael Kiehn. (2019) Using students’ interest in useful plants to encourage plant vision in the classroom. PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET 1:3, pages 261-270.
Crossref
D K Innatesari, S Sajidan & S Sukarmin. (2019) The Profile of Students’ Scientific Inquiry Literacy Based on Scientific Inquiry Literacy Test (ScInqLiT). Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1227:1, pages 012040.
Crossref
Esra Açıkgül Fırat & Mustafa S. Köksal. (2019) Development and Validation of the Biotechnology Literacy Test. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 47:2, pages 179-188.
Crossref
Svein Sjöberg. (2019) The PISA-syndrome - How the OECD has hijacked the way we perceive pupils, schools and education. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics 7:1, pages 34-88.
Crossref
Cemal Tosun. (2019) Scientific process skills test development within the topic “Matter and its Nature” and the predictive effect of different variables on 7th and 8th grade students’ scientific process skill levels. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 20:1, pages 160-174.
Crossref
Febrianto, A Wiyarsi, C F Partana & B Sulistyo. (2019) Chemistry in context: The development of hydrocarbon chemistry and petroleum module based on vehicle case. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1156, pages 012021.
Crossref
Svein Sjøberg. 2019. Handbuch Educational Governance Theorien. Handbuch Educational Governance Theorien 653 690 .
Andrej Šorgo, Brina Dojer, Nikolaja Golob, Robert Repnik, Samo Repolusk, Igor Pesek, Mateja Ploj Virtič, Andreja Špernjak & Natalija Špur. (2018) Opinions about STEM content and classroom experiences as predictors of upper secondary school students' career aspirations to become researchers or teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55:10, pages 1448-1468.
Crossref
Daniel Cebrián-Robles, Antonio-Joaquín Franco-Mariscal & Ángel Blanco-López. (2018) Preservice elementary science teachers’ argumentation competence: impact of a training programme. Instructional Science 46:5, pages 789-817.
Crossref
Shih-Yeh Chen & Shiang-Yao Liu. (2018) Reinforcement of Scientific Literacy through Effective Argumentation on an Energy-related Environmental Issue. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14:12.
Crossref
Kwok-cheung Cheung, Soi-kei Mak & Pou-seong Sit. (2018) Resolving the attitude–achievement paradox based on anchoring vignettes: evidences from the PISA 2012 mathematics study. Asia Pacific Education Review 19:3, pages 389-399.
Crossref
Jingoo Kang & Tuula Keinonen. (2017) The Effect of Student-Centered Approaches on Students’ Interest and Achievement in Science: Relevant Topic-Based, Open and Guided Inquiry-Based, and Discussion-Based Approaches. Research in Science Education 48:4, pages 865-885.
Crossref
Sanlyn R. Buxner, Chris D. Impey, James Romine & Megan Nieberding. (2018) Linking introductory astronomy students’ basic science knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, sources of information, and information literacy. Physical Review Physics Education Research 14:1.
Crossref
Lukmannudin, W Sopandi, A Sujana & R Sukardi. (2018) Pre-service primary school teachers’ abilities in explaining water and air pollution scientifically. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1013, pages 012084.
Crossref
Adar Ben-Eliyahu, Debra Moore, Rena Dorph & Christian D. Schunn. (2018) Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: Affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology 53, pages 87-105.
Crossref
Eileen Hebets, Melissa Welch-Lazoritz, Pawl Tisdale & Trish Wonch Hill. (2018) Eight-Legged Encounters—Arachnids, Volunteers, and Art help to Bridge the Gap between Informal and Formal Science Learning. Insects 9:1, pages 27.
Crossref
Fatchiyatun Ni’mah, Suhadi Ibnu & Sri Rahayu. How guided inquiry and coupled inquiry influence students attitude toward chemistry in buffer solution and solubility topics. How guided inquiry and coupled inquiry influence students attitude toward chemistry in buffer solution and solubility topics.
L. H. Montes, R. A. Ferreira & C. Rodríguez. (2018) Explaining secondary school students’ attitudes towards chemistry in Chile. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19:2, pages 533-542.
Crossref
Anssi Salonen, Sirpa Kärkkäinen & Tuula Keinonen. (2018) Career-related instruction promoting students’ career awareness and interest towards science learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19:2, pages 474-483.
Crossref
Foez Mojumder & Stephen Keast. 2018. Engaging in Educational Research. Engaging in Educational Research 201 220 .
Janet Blankenburg & Annette Scheersoi. 2018. Theorien in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung. Theorien in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung 245 259 .
Marianne Logan. 2017. Handbook of Comparative Studies on Community Colleges and Global Counterparts. Handbook of Comparative Studies on Community Colleges and Global Counterparts 1 28 .
Tormi Kotkas, Jack Holbrook & Miia Rannikmäe. (2017) A THEORY-BASED INSTRUMENT TO EVALUATE MOTIVATIONAL TRIGGERS PERCEIVED BY STUDENTS IN STEM CAREER-RELATED SCENARIOS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 16:6, pages 836-854.
Crossref
Mariana Vaitiekunas Pizarro & Jair Lopes Junior. (2017) OS SISTEMAS DE AVALIAÇÃO EM LARGA ESCALA E SEUS RESULTADOS: O PISA E SUAS POSSÍVEIS IMPLICAÇÕES PARA O ENSINO DE CIÊNCIAS. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Belo Horizonte) 19:0.
Crossref
R Aisyah, I A Zakiyah, I Farida & M A Ramdhani. (2017) Learning Crude Oil by Using Scientific Literacy Comics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 895, pages 012011.
Crossref
Ana Valdmann, Jack Holbrook & Miia Rannikmae. (2017) DETERMINING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A DESIGN–BASED, CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME FOR SCIENCE TEACHERS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 16:4, pages 576-591.
Crossref
Merve ERDEM, Fehime Sevil YALÇIN & Sibel TELLİ. (2017) İlkokul 3. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Mikroskop Üzerine Düşüncelerinin İncelenmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, pages 252-292.
Crossref
Anja Schiepe-Tiska, Silke Rönnebeck, Patricia Heitmann, Katrin Schöps, Manfred Prenzel & Gabriel Nagy. (2017) Die Veränderung der naturwissenschaftlichen Kompetenz von der 9. zur 10. Klasse bei PISA und den Bildungsstandards unter Berücksichtigung geschlechts- und schulartspezifischer Unterschiede sowie der Zusammensetzung der SchülerschaftChanges in Science Competence from 9th to 10th Grade in PISA and the German Educational Standards, taking into account Gender and School Track Specific Differences as well as the Composition of the Students. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 20:S2, pages 151-176.
Crossref
Susanne Walan & Birgitta Mc Ewen. (2016) Primary Teachers’ Reflections on Inquiry- and Context-Based Science Education. Research in Science Education 47:2, pages 407-426.
Crossref
Per Anderhag. 2017. Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research. Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research 39 54 .
Murat SAĞLAM, Hakan TÜRKMEN & Esin PEKMEZ. (2016) Fen Bilimleri Dersi Öğretmen Adaylarının Bilimsel Okuryazarlık Kavramı Üzerine Düşünceleri: Bir Durum Çalışması Tarama Araştırması. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, pages 46-46.
Crossref
Daniel Ness, Stephen J Farenga, Vishal Shah & Salvatore G Garofalo. (2016) Repositioning science reform efforts: Four practical recommendations from the field. Improving Schools 19:3, pages 258-266.
Crossref
Meghan Bathgate & Christian Schunn. (2016) Disentangling intensity from breadth of science interest: What predicts learning behaviors?. Instructional Science 44:5, pages 423-440.
Crossref
Insa Feinkohl, Danny Flemming, Ulrike Cress & Joachim Kimmerle. (2016) The Impact of Personality Factors and Preceding User Comments on the Processing of Research Findings on Deep Brain Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Experiment in a Simulated Online Forum. Journal of Medical Internet Research 18:3, pages e59.
Crossref
Sufen Chen, Chih-Chi Huang & Te-Lien Chou. (2015) The Effect of Metacognitive Scaffolds on Low Achievers’ Laboratory Learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14:2, pages 281-296.
Crossref
JANET SUSAN BLANKENBURG, TIM NICLAS HÖFFLER & ILKA PARCHMANN. (2016) Fostering Today What is Needed Tomorrow: Investigating Students’ Interest in Science. Science Education 100:2, pages 364-391.
Crossref
Pavol Prokop, Dominika Majerčíková & Zuzana Vyoralová. (2016) THE USE OF REALIA VERSUS POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS ON BOTANY LESSONS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 15:1, pages 18-27.
Crossref
Anja Schiepe-Tiska, Nina Roczen, Katharina Müller, Manfred Prenzel & Jonathan Osborne. 2016. Assessing Contexts of Learning. Assessing Contexts of Learning 301 329 .
Yi Lu & Daniel M. Bolt. (2015) Examining the attitude-achievement paradox in PISA using a multilevel multidimensional IRT model for extreme response style. Large-scale Assessments in Education 3:1.
Crossref
Angelika M. Meier & Franziska Vogt. (2015) The potential of stimulated recall for investigating self-regulation processes in inquiry learning with primary school students. Perspectives in Science 5, pages 45-53.
Crossref
Per Anderhag, Karim Mikael Hamza & Per-Olof Wickman. (2014) What Can a Teacher Do to Support Students’ Interest in Science? A Study of the Constitution of Taste in a Science Classroom. Research in Science Education 45:5, pages 749-784.
Crossref
Ralf A. L. F. van Griethuijsen, Michiel W. van Eijck, Helen Haste, Perry J. den Brok, Nigel C. Skinner, Nasser Mansour, Ayse Savran Gencer & Saouma BouJaoude. (2014) Global Patterns in Students’ Views of Science and Interest in Science. Research in Science Education 45:4, pages 581-603.
Crossref
P. Anderhag, P.-O. Wickman & K. M. Hamza. (2015) Signs of taste for science: a methodology for studying the constitution of interest in the science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education 10:2, pages 339-368.
Crossref
Martin H. Smith, Steven M. Worker, Andrea P. Ambrose & Lynn Schmitt-McQuitty. (2015) Scientific literacy: California 4-H defines it from citizens' perspective. California Agriculture 69:2, pages 92-97.
Crossref
Regina Soobard, Miia Rannikmäe & Priit Reiska. (2015) Upper Secondary Schools Students’ Progression in Operational Scientific Skills – A Comparison between Grades 10 and 12. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 177, pages 295-299.
Crossref
Malte Jansen, Ronny Scherer & Ulrich Schroeders. (2015) Students' self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology 41, pages 13-24.
Crossref
Peter E. Childs, Sarah M. Hayes & Anne O’dwyer. 2015. Relevant Chemistry Education. Relevant Chemistry Education 33 54 .
Mijung Kim. 2015. Encyclopedia of Science Education. Encyclopedia of Science Education 63 64 .
Jimmi Copriady. (2014) Pratical Implementation of Practical Chemistry among Secondary School Teachers. Asian Journal of Scientific Research 8:1, pages 22-40.
Crossref
Julie R. Bokor, Jacob B. Landis & Kent J. Crippen. (2014) High School Students’ Learning and Perceptions of Phylogenetics of Flowering Plants. CBE—Life Sciences Education 13:4, pages 653-665.
Crossref
Vania J Ma & Xin Ma. (2014) A comparative analysis of the relationship between learning styles and mathematics performance. International Journal of STEM Education 1:1.
Crossref
ANNA UITTO. (2014) INTEREST, ATTITUDES AND SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS EXPLAINING UPPER-SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ORIENTATION TOWARDS BIOLOGY-RELATED CAREERS. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12:6, pages 1425-1444.
Crossref
David Fortus. (2014) Attending to affect. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51:7, pages 821-835.
Crossref
Regina Soobard & Miia Rannikmäe. (2014) UPPER SECONDARY STUDENTS` SELF-PERCEPTIONS OF BOTH THEIR COMPETENCE IN PROBLEM SOLVING, DECISION MAKING AND REASONING WITHIN SCIENCE SUBJECTS AND THEIR FUTURE CAREERS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 13:4, pages 544-558.
Crossref
Luiz Clement, José Francisco Custódio, Sueli Édi Rufini & José de Pinho Alves Filho. (2014) Motivação autônoma de estudantes de física: evidências de validade de uma escala. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional 18:1, pages 45-55.
Crossref
MEGHAN E. BATHGATE, CHRISTIAN D. SCHUNN & RICHARD CORRENTI. (2014) Children's Motivation Toward Science Across Contexts, Manner of Interaction, and Topic. Science Education 98:2, pages 189-215.
Crossref
Eun Jung Park. (2014) Analysis and Identification of Students' Threshold Concepts in High School Chemistry. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 58:1, pages 126-129.
Crossref
Betul Demirdogen & Gultekin Cakmakci. (2014) Investigating students' interest in chemistry through self-generated questions. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:2, pages 192-206.
Crossref
Stephen P. Norris, Linda M. Phillips & David P. Burns. 2014. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching 1317 1344 .
Florence Le Hebel, Pascale Montpied & Andrée Tiberghien. 2014. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education. Topics and Trends in Current Science Education 273 289 .
Mijung Kim. 2021. Encyclopedia of Science Education. Encyclopedia of Science Education 1 2 .
Grady Venville, Léonie Rennie, Colin Hanbury & Nancy Longnecker. (2013) Scientists Reflect on Why They Chose to Study Science. Research in Science Education 43:6, pages 2207-2233.
Crossref
G. Hagay, A. Baram-Tsabari, J. Ametller, G. Cakmakci, B. Lopes, A. Moreira & H. Pedrosa-de-Jesus. (2012) The Generalizability of Students’ Interests in Biology Across Gender, Country and Religion. Research in Science Education 43:3, pages 895-919.
Crossref
Alister Jones & Cathy Buntting. 2013. Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy. Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy 33 53 .
Svein Sjøberg. (2012) PISA : politique, problèmes fondamentaux et résultats paradoxauxPISA: politics, fundamental problems and intriguing results. Recherches en éducation:14.
Crossref
Marianela Navarro & Carla Förster. (2012) Nivel de alfabetización científica y actitudes hacia la ciencia en estudiantes de secundaria: comparaciones por sexo y nivel socioeconómico. Pensamiento Educativo: Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana 49:1, pages 1-17.
Crossref
Rodger W. Bybee. 2012. Science | Environment | Health. Science | Environment | Health 49 67 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.