2,098
Views
67
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
THEORETICAL PAPER

Beyond Construction: Five arguments for the role and value of critique in learning science

, , &

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (20)

Yilmaz Soysal. (2023) Understanding linkage between teacher talk moves, discourse contexts and students’ talk productivity. Research in Science & Technological Education 41:4, pages 1452-1479.
Read now
Andrea Malek Ash & Brian Hand. (2022) Knowledge evaluation and disciplinary access: mutually supportive for learning. Learning: Research and Practice 8:2, pages 116-132.
Read now
Ronald W. Rinehart, Mason Kuhn & Todd M. Milford. (2022) The relationship between epistemic cognition and dialogic feedback in elementary and middle school science classrooms. Research in Science & Technological Education 40:3, pages 389-406.
Read now
Jonathan Grant Halls, Shaaron Elizabeth Ainsworth & Mary Colette Oliver. (2021) Using dialogic interventions to decrease children’s use of inappropriate teleological explanations. International Journal of Science Education 43:11, pages 1817-1836.
Read now
Rebecca Louick & Min Wang. (2021) Classroom discourse and disability: Interactional opportunities for development of self-determination beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research 114:1, pages 52-63.
Read now
Laurence Viennot. (2020) How to choose which explanation to use with students? Discussing the tensiometer with beginning teachers. International Journal of Science Education 42:17, pages 2898-2920.
Read now
Marisa Castronova & Ellina Chernobilsky. (2020) Teachers’ Pedagogical Reflections on the Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education 31:4, pages 401-413.
Read now
Catherine L. Quinlan. (2020) Analysis of preservice teachers’ lesson plans to determine the extent of transfer of argumentation. International Journal of Science Education 42:7, pages 1207-1223.
Read now
Juan Quílez. (2019) A categorisation of the terminological sources of student difficulties when learning chemistry. Studies in Science Education 55:2, pages 121-167.
Read now
Cleci Werner da Rosa & José Otero. (2018) Influence of source credibility on students’ noticing and assessing comprehension obstacles in science texts. International Journal of Science Education 40:13, pages 1653-1668.
Read now
Anita S. Tseng. (2018) Students and evaluation of web-based misinformation about vaccination: critical reading or passive acceptance of claims?. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 8:3, pages 250-265.
Read now
Antonia Larrain, Christine Howe & Paulina Freire. (2018) ‘More is not necessarily better’: curriculum materials support the impact of classroom argumentative dialogue in science teaching on content knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education 36:3, pages 282-301.
Read now
Maurice M. W. Cheng & John K. Gilbert. (2017) Modelling students’ visualisation of chemical reaction. International Journal of Science Education 39:9, pages 1173-1193.
Read now
Evan J. Fishman, Hilda Borko, Jonathan Osborne, Florencia Gomez, Stephanie Rafanelli, Emily Reigh, Anita Tseng, Susan Million & Eric Berson. (2017) A Practice-Based Professional Development Program to Support Scientific Argumentation From Evidence in the Elementary Classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education 28:3, pages 222-249.
Read now
María González-Howard, Katherine L. McNeill, Lisa M. Marco-Bujosa & C. Patrick Proctor. (2017) ‘Does it answer the question or is it French fries?’: an exploration of language supports for scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education 39:5, pages 528-547.
Read now
Hugo Mercier, Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri & Emmanuel Trouche. (2017) Natural-Born Arguers: Teaching How to Make the Best of Our Reasoning Abilities. Educational Psychologist 52:1, pages 1-16.
Read now
Maurice M. W. Cheng & Pey-Tee Oon. (2016) Understanding metallic bonding: Structure, process and interaction by Rasch analysis. International Journal of Science Education 38:12, pages 1923-1944.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (47)

Alexandra C. Cooper & Molly S. Bolger. (2023) The Classroom‐Research‐Mentoring Framework: A lens for understanding science practice‐based instruction. Science Education 108:1, pages 275-307.
Crossref
Samaher Nama, Maysa Hayeen-Halloun & Michal Ayalon. (2023) Noticing of argumentation: A comparison between pre-service and in-service secondary-school mathematics teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 72, pages 101098.
Crossref
Philipp Bagus, Frank Daumann & Florian Follert. (2023) Microaggressions, cancel culture, safe spaces, and academic freedom: A private property rights argumentation. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility.
Crossref
Hsin-Yi Chang. (2023) Scaffolding online peer critiquing to develop students’ epistemic criteria of data visualization. Computers & Education 203, pages 104863.
Crossref
Yilmaz Soysal. (2022) Quality Indicators of an Experienced Middle School Science Teacher’s Argument‑Based Inquiry Teaching. Science & Education 32:3, pages 689-736.
Crossref
Xiaoming Zhai, Kevin C. Haudek & Wenchao Ma. (2022) Assessing Argumentation Using Machine Learning and Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling. Research in Science Education 53:2, pages 405-424.
Crossref
Jinglu Zhang & William J. Browne. (2022) Exploring Chinese high school students' performance and perceptions of scientific argumentation by understanding it as a three‐component progression of competencies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60:4, pages 847-884.
Crossref
Alexandra List & Gala S. Campos Oaxaca. (2023) Comprehension and critique: an examination of students’ evaluations of information in texts. Reading and Writing.
Crossref
José Otero & Cleci Werner da Rosa. (2023) Metacognición en el aprendizaje de las ciencias: saber lo que no se sabe o no se comprende. Educação e Pesquisa 49.
Crossref
Yilmaz Soysal. (2022) Science Teachers’ Challenging Questions for Encouraging Students to Think and Speak in Novel Ways. Science & Education.
Crossref
Kaylee Allison Laub. (2022) Leaning into Controversy: Pandemic Conversations in a Science Classroom. Language Arts 100:1.
Crossref
Gokce Meral Canoz, Sedat Ucar & Tuba Demircioglu. (2022) Investigate the effect of argumentation-promoted interactive simulation applications on students’ argumentation levels, academic achievements, and entrepreneurship skills in science classes. Thinking Skills and Creativity 45, pages 101106.
Crossref
Jais Brohinsky, Gerhard Sonnert & Philip Sadler. (2021) The Devil’s Advocate. Science & Education 31:3, pages 575-596.
Crossref
Chen-Chung Liu, Cai-Ting Wen, Hsin-Yi Chang, Ming-Hua Chang, Po-Han Lai, Shih-Hsun Fan Chiang, Chih-Wei Yang & Fu-Kwun Hwang. (2022) Augmenting the effect of virtual labs with "teacher demonstration" and "student critique" instructional designs to scaffold the development of scientific literacy. Instructional Science 50:2, pages 303-333.
Crossref
Laurence Viennot. (2022) Typology of pitfalls for causal analyses in physics The case of capillary forces. EPJ Web of Conferences 263, pages 01007.
Crossref
Anita S. Tseng, Sade Bonilla & Anna MacPherson. (2021) Fighting “bad science” in the information age: The effects of an intervention to stimulate evaluation and critique of false scientific claims. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58:8, pages 1152-1178.
Crossref
Antuni Wiyarsi, A. K. Prodjosantoso & Anggiyani R. E. Nugraheni. (2021) Promoting Students’ Scientific Habits of Mind and Chemical Literacy Using the Context of Socio-Scientific Issues on the Inquiry Learning. Frontiers in Education 6.
Crossref
Päivi H. Taskinen & Julia Dietrich. 2021. Motivation in unterrichtlichen fachbezogenen Lehr-Lernkontexten. Motivation in unterrichtlichen fachbezogenen Lehr-Lernkontexten 265 298 .
Ying-Yan Lu, Huann-shyang Lin, Thomas J. Smith, Zuway-R Hong & Wen-Yi Hsu. (2020) THE EFFECTS OF CRITIQUE-DRIVEN INQUIRY INTERVENTION ON STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING AND SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY COMPETENCY. Journal of Baltic Science Education 19:6, pages 954-971.
Crossref
María González‐Howard & Katherine L. McNeill. (2020) Acting with epistemic agency: Characterizing student critique during argumentation discussions. Science Education 104:6, pages 953-982.
Crossref
Douglas Allchin & Gábor Á. Zemplén. (2020) Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and Whole Science. Science Education 104:5, pages 907-933.
Crossref
Aviv J. Sharon & Ayelet Baram‐Tsabari. (2020) Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life?. Science Education 104:5, pages 873-894.
Crossref
Josh Medrano, Joshua Jaffe, Doug Lombardi, Margaret Holzer & Christopher Roemmele. (2020) Students’ Scientific Evaluations of Water Resources. Water 12:7, pages 2048.
Crossref
Yann Shiou Ong, Richard A. Duschl & Julia D. Plummer. 2020. Science Education in the 21st Century. Science Education in the 21st Century 81 93 .
Laurence Viennot & Nicolas DécampLaurence Viennot & Nicolas Décamp. 2020. Developing Critical Thinking in Physics. Developing Critical Thinking in Physics 1 9 .
J. Bryan Henderson & Earl Aguilera. 2020. Active Learning in College Science. Active Learning in College Science 587 602 .
R N Afifah, E Syaodih, A Suhandi, B Maftuh, N Hermita, H Handayani, Qonita, A R Ningsih, Y Gumala & A Samsudin. (2019) Develop children’s science process skills through building activities in center of beam: optical geometry on focus. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1280:5, pages 052016.
Crossref
S. J. R. Hansen, B. Hu, D. Riedlova, R. M. Kelly, S. Akaygun & A. Villalta-Cerdas. (2019) Critical consumption of chemistry visuals: eye tracking structured variation and visual feedback of redox and precipitation reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 20:4, pages 837-850.
Crossref
Lynda Dunlop & Fernanda Veneu. (2019) Controversies in Science. Science & Education 28:6-7, pages 689-710.
Crossref
Gugu Ndawo. (2019) The influence of language of instruction in the facilitation of academic activities: Nurse educators’ experiences. Health SA Gesondheid 24.
Crossref
Jonathan F. Osborne, Hilda Borko, Evan Fishman, Florencia Gomez Zaccarelli, Eric Berson, K. C. Busch, Emily Reigh & Anita Tseng. (2019) Impacts of a Practice-Based Professional Development Program on Elementary Teachers’ Facilitation of and Student Engagement With Scientific Argumentation. American Educational Research Journal 56:4, pages 1067-1112.
Crossref
María González‐Howard. (2019) Exploring the utility of social network analysis for visualizing interactions during argumentation discussions. Science Education 103:3, pages 503-528.
Crossref
John McCuin, Mark Bloom & Catherine Koehler. 2018. Instructional Leadership in the Content Areas. Instructional Leadership in the Content Areas 186 195 .
Katherine L. McNeill, Rebecca J. Lowenhaupt & Rebecca Katsh‐Singer. (2018) Instructional leadership in the era of the NGSS: Principals’ understandings of science practices. Science Education 102:3, pages 452-473.
Crossref
J. Bryan Henderson, Katherine L. McNeill, María González-Howard, Kevin Close & Mat Evans. (2018) Key challenges and future directions for educational research on scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55:1, pages 5-18.
Crossref
Doug Lombardi, Elliot S. Bickel, Janelle M. Bailey & Shondricka Burrell. (2017) High school students’ evaluations, plausibility (re) appraisals, and knowledge about topics in Earth science. Science Education 102:1, pages 153-177.
Crossref
Christy Belardo, Andrea C. Burrows & Lydia Dambekalns. (2017) PARTNERING SCIENCE AND ART: PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCES FOR USE IN PRE-COLLEGIATE CLASSROOMS. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 75:3, pages 215-234.
Crossref
Ying-Chih Chen, Brian Hand & Lori Norton-Meier. (2016) Teacher Roles of Questioning in Early Elementary Science Classrooms: A Framework Promoting Student Cognitive Complexities in Argumentation. Research in Science Education 47:2, pages 373-405.
Crossref
Niall Seery. 2017. Critique in Design and Technology Education. Critique in Design and Technology Education 255 273 .
PER KIND & JONATHAN OSBORNE. (2017) Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education?. Science Education 101:1, pages 8-31.
Crossref
Tom Bielik & Anat Yarden. (2016) Promoting the asking of research questions in a high-school biotechnology inquiry-oriented program. International Journal of STEM Education 3:1.
Crossref
ANNA C. MACPHERSON. (2016) A Comparison of Scientists’ Arguments and School Argumentation Tasks. Science Education 100:6, pages 1062-1091.
Crossref
Hugo Mercier. (2016) The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and Empirical Evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20:9, pages 689-700.
Crossref
Jonathan F. Osborne, J. Bryan Henderson, Anna MacPherson, Evan Szu, Andrew Wild & Shi-Ying Yao. (2016) The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53:6, pages 821-846.
Crossref
Ying-Chih Chen, Brian Hand & Soonhye Park. (2016) Examining Elementary Students’ Development of Oral and Written Argumentation Practices Through Argument-Based Inquiry. Science & Education 25:3-4, pages 277-320.
Crossref
Katharina Müller, Manfred Prenzel, Tina Seidel, Anja Schiepe-Tiska & Marit Kjærnsli. 2016. Assessing Contexts of Learning. Assessing Contexts of Learning 423 446 .
Philipp Bagus, Frank Daumann & Florian Follert. (2022) Cancel Culture, Safe Spaces, and Academic Freedom: A Private Property Rights Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.