Citations (56)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (13)
Luis Miguel Rivera Gavidia & Juan José Marrero Galván. (2023) Predictions and explanations about scientific situations in a high school context. International Journal of Science Education 45:2, pages 144-163.
Read now
Read now
Víctor López & Roser Pintó. (2017) Identifying secondary-school students’ difficulties when reading visual representations displayed in physics simulations. International Journal of Science Education 39:10, pages 1353-1380.
Read now
Read now
Barney Dalgarno, Gregor Kennedy & Sue Bennett. (2014) The impact of students’ exploration strategies on discovery learning using computer-based simulations. Educational Media International 51:4, pages 310-329.
Read now
Read now
Julia D. Plummer. (2014) Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education 50:1, pages 1-45.
Read now
Read now
Ching-Huei Chen, I-Chia Wu & Fen-Lan Jen. (2013) Designing online scaffolds for interactive computer simulation. Interactive Learning Environments 21:3, pages 229-243.
Read now
Read now
Lara
Kathleen Smetana & Randy
L. Bell. (2012) Computer Simulations to Support Science Instruction and Learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education 34:9, pages 1337-1370.
Read now
Read now
Robb Lindgren & DanielL. Schwartz. (2009) Spatial Learning and Computer Simulations in Science. International Journal of Science Education 31:3, pages 419-438.
Read now
Read now
Sara Hennessy, Rosemary Deaney & Kenneth Ruthven. (2006) Situated Expertise in Integrating Use of Multimedia Simulation into Secondary Science Teaching. International Journal of Science Education 28:7, pages 701-732.
Read now
Read now
Haim Eshach & JudahL. Schwartz. (2006) Sound Stuff? Naïve materialism in middle‐school students’ conceptions of sound. International Journal of Science Education 28:7, pages 733-764.
Read now
Read now
PerryD. Klein. (2006) The Challenges of Scientific Literacy: From the viewpoint of second‐generation cognitive science. International Journal of Science Education 28:2-3, pages 143-178.
Read now
Read now
Mary E. Webb
. (2005) Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education 27:6, pages 705-735.
Read now
Read now
John J. Clement & Melvin S. Steinberg. (2002) Step-Wise Evolution of Mental Models of Electric C ircuits: A "Learning-Aloud" Case Study. Journal of the Learning Sciences 11:4, pages 389-452.
Read now
Read now
John Clement. (2000) Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education 22:9, pages 1041-1053.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (43)
Paul Alstein, Kim Krijtenburg-Lewerissa & Wouter R. van Joolingen. (2023) Designing and Evaluating Relativity Lab: A Simulation Environment for Special Relativity Education at the Secondary Level. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Crossref
Crossref
Elias Euler, Lorena Solvang, Bor Gregorcic & Jesper Haglund. 2023. The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Special Topics. The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Special Topics
21-1
21-28
.
Ferran Suñer & Jörg Roche. (2021) Embodiment in concept-based L2 grammar teaching: The case of German light verb constructions. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 59:3, pages 421-447.
Crossref
Crossref
Mahmoud Regagda & Omar Hamdway. (2021) مساهمة ديناميكية الطالب في التكوين بالجامعة الجزائرية (في ظل تكنولوجيات التعليم الجديدة). مجلة التمكين الاجتماعي 3:1, pages 67-77.
Crossref
Crossref
Santiago Restrepo-Lopez, Andres Felipe Perez-Restrepo & Carlos Andres Trujillo-Suarez. (2021) Development and evaluation of computational applications for teaching kinematics in engineering. Development and evaluation of computational applications for teaching kinematics in engineering.
Hamilton Trejos-Velasquez & Carlos Andres Trujillo-Suarez. (2021) Evaluation of free computer applications in the teaching of kinematics in engineering. Evaluation of free computer applications in the teaching of kinematics in engineering.
Andrew Elby & Sevda Yerdelen-Damar. (2020) Rethinking the relationship between instructors and physics education researchers. Physical Review Physics Education Research 16:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie Schwedler & Marvin Kaldewey. (2020) Linking the submicroscopic and symbolic level in physical chemistry: how voluntary simulation-based learning activities foster first-year university students’ conceptual understanding. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 21:4, pages 1132-1147.
Crossref
Crossref
Robson Trevisan, Agostinho Serrano, Jeferson Wolff & Adriana Ramos. (2019) Peeking into students’ mental imagery: the Report Aloud technique in Science Education research. Ciência & Educação (Bauru) 25:3, pages 647-664.
Crossref
Crossref
Bei Yuan, Jun Peng, Minhong Wang & Liang Kuang. 2019. Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations. Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations
3
14
.
Wenjin Vikki Bo, Gavin W. Fulmer, Christine Kim-Eng Lee & Victor Der-Thanq Chen. (2018) How Do Secondary Science Teachers Perceive the Use of Interactive Simulations? The Affordance in Singapore Context. Journal of Science Education and Technology 27:6, pages 550-565.
Crossref
Crossref
Ning FangJacek Uziak. (2018) Student Misconceptions of General Plane Motion in Rigid-Body Kinematics. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 144:3.
Crossref
Crossref
Ulises Salinas-Hernández & Isaias Miranda. 2018. Signs of Signification. Signs of Signification
55
71
.
Stephanie Moser, Joerg Zumbach & Ines Deibl. (2017) The effect of metacognitive training and prompting on learning success in simulation-based physics learning. Science Education 101:6, pages 944-967.
Crossref
Crossref
Tanya Gupta, Zachary P. Ziolkowski, Gregory Albing & Akash Mehta. 2017. Optimizing STEM Education With Advanced ICTs and Simulations. Optimizing STEM Education With Advanced ICTs and Simulations
186
218
.
Franco Landriscina. 2017. Digital Tools and Solutions for Inquiry-Based STEM Learning. Digital Tools and Solutions for Inquiry-Based STEM Learning
33
60
.
Robb Lindgren, Michael Tscholl, Shuai Wang & Emily Johnson. (2016) Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education 95, pages 174-187.
Crossref
Crossref
Elif İnce, Fatma Gülay Kırbaşlar, Zeliha Özsoy Güneş, Yavuz Yaman, Özgü Yolcu & Ergun Yolcu. (2015) An Innovative Approach in Virtual Laboratory Education: The Case of “IUVIRLAB” and Relationships between Communication Skills with the Usage of IUVIRLAB. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195, pages 1768-1777.
Crossref
Crossref
Yi-Fen Yeh, Fu-Kwun Hwang & Ying-Shao Hsu. 2015. Development of Science Teachers' TPACK. Development of Science Teachers' TPACK
71
88
.
Sedat Uçar. (2014) THE EFFECTS OF SIMULATION-BASED AND MODEL-BASED EDUCATION ON THE TRANSFER OF TEACHING WITH REGARD TO MOON PHASES. Journal of Baltic Science Education 13:3, pages 327-338.
Crossref
Crossref
Ileana M. Greca, Eugenia Seoane & Irene Arriassecq. (2014) Epistemological Issues Concerning Computer Simulations in Science and Their Implications for Science Education. Science & Education 23:4, pages 897-921.
Crossref
Crossref
Lynn Bell, Nicole Juersivich, Thomas C. Hammond & Randy L. Bell. 2014. K-12 Education. K-12 Education
1139
1171
.
Michael Kozhevnikov, Johannes Gurlitt & Maria Kozhevnikov. (2013) Learning Relative Motion Concepts in Immersive and Non-immersive Virtual Environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22:6, pages 952-962.
Crossref
Crossref
Nesli Kala, Fatma Yaman & Alipaşa Ayas. (2012) THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PREDICT–OBSERVE–EXPLAIN TECHNIQUE IN PROBING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING ABOUT ACID–BASE CHEMISTRY: A CASE FOR THE CONCEPTS OF pH, pOH, AND STRENGTH. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11:3, pages 555-574.
Crossref
Crossref
M. Kozhevnikov & J. Gurlitt. (2013) Immersive and non-immersive virtual reality system to learn relative motion concepts. Immersive and non-immersive virtual reality system to learn relative motion concepts.
Lynn Bell, Nicole Juersivich, Thomas C. Hammond & Randy L. Bell. 2012. Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact. Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact
103
135
.
A. Lynn Stephens & John J. Clement. (2010) Documenting the use of expert scientific reasoning processes by high school physics students. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 6:2.
Crossref
Crossref
David Sands. (2010) First year mechanics taught through modelling in VPython. New Directions:6, pages 47-50.
Crossref
Crossref
Kathy Cabe Trundle & Randy L. Bell. (2010) The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education 54:4, pages 1078-1088.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthew T. Marino. (2010) Defining a Technology Research Agenda for Elementary and Secondary Students with Learning and other High-Incidence Disabilities in Inclusive Science Classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology 25:1, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Crossref
Eva Erdosne Toth, Becky L. Morrow & Lisa R. Ludvico. (2008) Designing Blended Inquiry Learning in a Laboratory Context: A Study of Incorporating Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories. Innovative Higher Education 33:5, pages 333-344.
Crossref
Crossref
Ying-Shao Hsu, Hsin-Kai Wu & Fu-Kwun Hwang. (2007) Fostering High School Students’ Conceptual Understandings About Seasons: The Design of a Technology-enhanced Learning Environment. Research in Science Education 38:2, pages 127-147.
Crossref
Crossref
Randy L. Bell & Kathy Cabe Trundle. (2007) The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45:3, pages 346-372.
Crossref
Crossref
Jim Davies & Ashok K. Goel. (2007) Transfer of problem-solving strategy using Covlan. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 18:2, pages 149-164.
Crossref
Crossref
Jim Davies, Janice Glasgow & Tony Kuo. 2007. Spatial Cognition V Reasoning, Action, Interaction. Spatial Cognition V Reasoning, Action, Interaction
127
139
.
Jim Davies, Janice Glasgow & Tony Kuo. (2006) VISIO-SPATIAL CASE-BASED REASONING: A CASE STUDY IN PREDICTION OF PROTEIN STRUCTURE. Computational Intelligence 22:3-4, pages 194-207.
Crossref
Crossref
BaoHui Zhang, Xiufeng Liu & Joseph S. Krajcik. (2006) Expert models and modeling processes associated with a computer‐modeling tool. Science Education 90:4, pages 579-604.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiufeng Liu. (2006) Effects of Combined Hands-on Laboratory and Computer Modeling on Student Learning of Gas Laws: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15:1, pages 89-100.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiufeng Liu & Dan MacIsaac. (2005) An Investigation of Factors Affecting the Degree of Na�ve Impetus Theory Application. Journal of Science Education and Technology 14:1, pages 101-116.
Crossref
Crossref
Jim Davies, Ashok K. Goel & Nancy J. Nersessian. 2005. Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development
163
176
.
Galit Botzer & Miriam Reiner. 2005. Visualization in Science Education. Visualization in Science Education
147
168
.
John Clement, Aletta Zietsman & James Monaghan. 2005. Visualization in Science Education. Visualization in Science Education
169
184
.
L. ChanLin. (2001) Formats and prior knowledge on learning in a computer‐based lesson. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17:4, pages 409-419.
Crossref
Crossref