1,637
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Wind Power Planning Controversies and the Construction of ‘Expert’ and ‘Lay’ Knowledges

Pages 47-64 | Published online: 29 Mar 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (18)

Gwen Ottinger. (2023) Careful knowing as an aspect of environmental justice. Environmental Politics 0:0, pages 1-20.
Read now
Bleta Arifi & Georg Winkel. (2021) Wind energy counter-conducts in Germany: understanding a new wave of socio-environmental grassroots protest. Environmental Politics 30:5, pages 811-832.
Read now
Skylar Zilliox & Jessica M. Smith. (2018) Colorado’s Fracking Debates: Citizen Science, Conflict and Collaboration. Science as Culture 27:2, pages 221-241.
Read now
Yvonne Rydin, Lucy Natarajan, Maria Lee & Simon Lock. (2018) Black-boxing the Evidence: Planning Regulation and Major Renewable Energy Infrastructure Projects in England and Wales. Planning Theory & Practice 19:2, pages 218-234.
Read now
Vuokko Kurki, Annina Takala & Eija Vinnari. (2016) Clashing coalitions: a discourse analysis of an artificial groundwater recharge project in Finland. Local Environment 21:11, pages 1317-1331.
Read now
Mhairi Aitken, Claire Haggett & David Rudolph. (2016) Practices and rationales of community engagement with wind farms: awareness raising, consultation, empowerment. Planning Theory & Practice 17:4, pages 557-576.
Read now
Stefan Larsson & Lars Emmelin. (2016) Objectively best or most acceptable? Expert and lay knowledge in Swedish wind power permit processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59:8, pages 1360-1376.
Read now
Matthew Ogilvie & Christopher Rootes. (2015) The impact of local campaigns against wind energy developments. Environmental Politics 24:6, pages 874-893.
Read now
Mick Lennon & Mark Scott. (2015) Contending Expertise: An Interpretive Approach to (Re)conceiving Wind Power's ‘Planning Problem’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 17:5, pages 593-616.
Read now
Gwen Ottinger. (2013) The Winds of Change: Environmental Justice in Energy Transitions. Science as Culture 22:2, pages 222-229.
Read now
Derek Bell, Tim Gray, Claire Haggett & Joanne Swaffield. (2013) Re-visiting the ‘social gap’: public opinion and relations of power in the local politics of wind energy. Environmental Politics 22:1, pages 115-135.
Read now
SarahR. Davies & Cynthia Selin. (2012) Energy Futures: Five Dilemmas of the Practice of Anticipatory Governance. Environmental Communication 6:1, pages 119-136.
Read now
Mhairi Aitken. (2012) Changing climate, changing democracy: a cautionary tale. Environmental Politics 21:2, pages 211-229.
Read now
Karin Gustafsson. (2011) Made in conflict. Local residents' construction of a local environmental problem. Local Environment 16:7, pages 655-670.
Read now
Christian Brannstrom, Wendy Jepson & Nicole Persons. (2011) Social Perspectives on Wind-Power Development in West Texas. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101:4, pages 839-851.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (43)

Geraint Ellis, Nina Schneider & Rolf Wüstenhagen. (2023) Dynamics of social acceptance of renewable energy: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 181, pages 113706.
Crossref
Julia Kirch Kirkegaard, Sophie Nyborg, Susse Georg & Maja Horst. (2023) Towards failed renewable energy communities? Activist attempts to change market conditions in the Danish wind energy market. Energy Research & Social Science 102, pages 103152.
Crossref
Julia Kirch Kirkegaard, David Rudolph, Sophie Nyborg & Tom Cronin. (2022) The landrush of wind energy, its socio-material workings, and its political consequences: On the entanglement of land and wind assemblages in Denmark. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 41:3, pages 548-566.
Crossref
Gundula Hübner, Valentin Leschinger, Florian J.Y. Müller & Johannes Pohl. (2023) Broadening the social acceptance of wind energy – An Integrated Acceptance Model. Energy Policy 173, pages 113360.
Crossref
Lucas Schwarz. (2022) Is It All about a Science-Informed Decision? A Quantitative Approach to Three Dimensions of Justice and Their Relation in the Nuclear Waste Repository Siting Process in Germany. Societies 12:6, pages 179.
Crossref
Maria Bednarek-Szczepańska. (2022) The power of protest in the EIA proceedings. Influence of local community on environmental decisions regarding intensive livestock operations - Example of Poland. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 97, pages 106868.
Crossref
Salma Elmallah & Joseph Rand. (2022) “After the leases are signed, it's a done deal”: Exploring procedural injustices for utility-scale wind energy planning in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science 89, pages 102549.
Crossref
Yasminah Beebeejaun. (2021) Fracking and epistemic injustice: A feminist critique of knowledge formation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, pages 239965442110364.
Crossref
Dik Roth, Michiel Köhne, Elisabet Dueholm Rasch & Madelinde Winnubst. (2020) After the facts: Producing, using and contesting knowledge in two spatial-environmental conflicts in the Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39:3, pages 626-645.
Crossref
Niek Mouter, Ruth M. Shortall, Shannon L. Spruit & Anatol V. Itten. (2021) Including young people, cutting time and producing useful outcomes: Participatory value evaluation as a new practice of public participation in the Dutch energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science 75, pages 101965.
Crossref
Silver Sillak, Kristian Borch & Karl Sperling. (2021) Assessing co-creation in strategic planning for urban energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 74, pages 101952.
Crossref
Eefje Cuppen & Udo Pesch. 2021. A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructures. A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructures 161 178 .
Wenting Chen, Phoebe Koundouri, Osiel González Dávila, Claire Haggett, David Rudolph, Shiau–Yun Lu, Chia–Fa Chi, Jason Yu, Lars Golmen & Yung–Hsiang Ying. 2021. The Ocean of Tomorrow. The Ocean of Tomorrow 61 82 .
Luís Junqueira. 2021. Communicating Science and Technology in Society. Communicating Science and Technology in Society 79 94 .
Tomas Ariztia & Felipe Raglianti. (2020) The material politics of solar energy: Exploring diverse energy ecologies and publics in the design, installation, and use of off-grid photovoltaics in Chile. Energy Research & Social Science 69, pages 101540.
Crossref
David J. Hess & Benjamin K. Sovacool. (2020) Sociotechnical matters: Reviewing and integrating science and technology studies with energy social science. Energy Research & Social Science 65, pages 101462.
Crossref
Carolyn Abbot. (2020) Losing the local? Public participation and legal expertise in planning law. Legal Studies 40:2, pages 269-285.
Crossref
Lucas Schwarz. (2020) Empowered but powerless? Reassessing the citizens’ power dynamics of the German energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science 63, pages 101405.
Crossref
Michelle L. Edwards. (2019) Uncertainty and trustworthiness in discussions of fracking: Exploring the views of academic scientists and local governmental representatives. The Extractive Industries and Society 6:4, pages 1113-1121.
Crossref
Ariane Debourdeau & Alain Nadaï. 2019. Local Energy Autonomy. Local Energy Autonomy 239 269 .
Lucy NatarajanSimon J. LockYvonne RydinMaria Lee. (2019) Participatory planning and major infrastructure: experiences in REI NSIP regulation. Town Planning Review 90:2, pages 117-138.
Crossref
Fabien Medvecky. (2017) Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice. Science and Engineering Ethics 24:5, pages 1393-1408.
Crossref
Robert Gennaro Sposato & Nina Hampl. (2018) Worldviews as predictors of wind and solar energy support in Austria: Bridging social acceptance and risk perception research. Energy Research & Social Science 42, pages 237-246.
Crossref
Yasminah Beebeejaun. 2018. Planning Practice. Planning Practice 85 100 .
L. Natarajan, Y. Rydin, S.J. Lock & M. Lee. (2018) Navigating the participatory processes of renewable energy infrastructure regulation: A ‘local participant perspective’ on the NSIPs regime in England and Wales. Energy Policy 114, pages 201-210.
Crossref
Luís Silva & Ana Delicado. (2017) Wind farms and rural tourism: A Portuguese case study of residents’ and visitors’ perceptions and attitudes. Moravian Geographical Reports 25:4, pages 248-256.
Crossref
Bregje van Veelen & Claire Haggett. (2017) Uncommon Ground: The Role of Different Place Attachments in Explaining Community Renewable Energy Projects. Sociologia Ruralis 57, pages 533-554.
Crossref
Gwen Ottinger. (2017) Making sense of citizen science: Stories as a hermeneutic resource. Energy Research & Social Science 31, pages 41-49.
Crossref
Ana Delicado, Mónica Truninger, Elisabete Figueiredo, Luís Silva & Ana Horta. 2017. Transforming the Rural. Transforming the Rural 179 195 .
Yasminah Beebeejaun. (2016) Exploring the intersections between local knowledge and environmental regulation: A study of shale gas extraction in Texas and Lancashire. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35:3, pages 417-433.
Crossref
Maria Lee. (2018) Winner of the SLS Annual Conference Best Paper Prize 2016: Knowledge and landscape in wind energy planning. Legal Studies 37:1, pages 3-24.
Crossref
Pablo Mendez. (2016) Professional experts and lay knowledge in Vancouver’s accessory apartment rental market. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48:11, pages 2223-2238.
Crossref
Martin Espig & Kim de Rijke. (2016) Unconventional gas developments and the politics of risk and knowledge in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science 20, pages 82-90.
Crossref
Cynthia Hardy & Steve Maguire. (2016) Organizing Risk: Discourse, Power, and “Riskification”. Academy of Management Review 41:1, pages 80-108.
Crossref
Ellen Stewart & Mhairi Aitken. (2015) Beyond NIMBYs and NOOMBYs: what can wind farm controversies teach us about public involvement in hospital closures?. BMC Health Services Research 15:1.
Crossref
Anahita A.N. Jami & Philip R. Walsh. (2014) The role of public participation in identifying stakeholder synergies in wind power project development: The case study of Ontario, Canada. Renewable Energy 68, pages 194-202.
Crossref
Mhairi Aitken. (2014) E-Planning and Public Participation. International Journal of E-Planning Research 3:2, pages 38-53.
Crossref
Ana Delicado, Luís Silva, Luís Junqueira, Ana Horta, Susana Fonseca & Mónica Truninger. (2013) Ambiente, paisagem, património e economia: Os conflitos em torno de parques eólicos em PortugalEnvironment, Landscape, Heritage and the Economy: Conflicts over Wind Farms in PortugalEnvironnement, paysage, patrimoine et économie: les conflits à propos de parcs éoliens au Portugal. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais:100, pages 11-36.
Crossref
Susan Ainsworth & Cynthia Hardy. (2012) Subjects of Inquiry: Statistics, Stories, and the Production of Knowledge. Organization Studies 33:12, pages 1693-1714.
Crossref
Sally Eden & Christopher Bear. (2012) The Good, the Bad, and the Hands-on: Constructs of Public Participation, Anglers, and Lay Management of Water Environments. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44:5, pages 1200-1218.
Crossref
Mhairi Aitken. (2010) Wind power and community benefits: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Policy 38:10, pages 6066-6075.
Crossref
Mhairi Aitken. (2010) A three-dimensional view of public participation in Scottish land-use planning: Empowerment or social control?. Planning Theory 9:3, pages 248-264.
Crossref
Mhairi Aitken. (2010) Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy 38:4, pages 1834-1841.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.