12,439
Views
86
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
SAC FORUM: PUBLIC AS THREATS TO TECHNOSCIENTIFIC PROGRESS (PART I)

The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (11)

Garrett M. Broad & Charlotte Biltekoff. (2023) Food System Innovations, Science Communication, and Deficit Model 2.0: Implications for Cellular Agriculture. Environmental Communication 17:8, pages 868-874.
Read now
John R. Caradus. (2023) Intended and unintended consequences of genetically modified crops – myth, fact and/or manageable outcomes?. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 66:6, pages 519-619.
Read now
Tess Doezema. (2023) The promise of ELSI: coproducing the future of life on earth. Science as Culture 32:4, pages 461-485.
Read now
Ken Taylor, Simon Woods, Alex Johns & Heath Murray. (2023) Intrinsic responsible innovation in a synthetic biology research project. New Genetics and Society 42:1.
Read now
Charlotte Biltekoff & Julie Guthman. (2023) Conscious, Complacent, Fearful: Agri-Food Tech’s Market-Making Public Imaginaries. Science as Culture 32:1, pages 58-82.
Read now
Ken Taylor & Simon Woods. (2020) Reflections on the practice of Responsible (Research and) Innovation in synthetic biology. New Genetics and Society 39:2, pages 127-147.
Read now
Elvira Uyarra, Barbara Ribeiro & Lisa Dale-Clough. (2019) Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: responsibility and the quest for public value. European Planning Studies 27:12, pages 2359-2375.
Read now
Sarah Hartley, Carmen McLeod, Mike Clifford, Sarah Jewitt & Charlotte Ray. (2019) A retrospective analysis of responsible innovation for low-technology innovation in the Global South. Journal of Responsible Innovation 6:2, pages 143-162.
Read now
Barbara Ribeiro, Lars Bengtsson, Paul Benneworth, Susanne Bührer, Elena Castro-Martínez, Meiken Hansen, Katharina Jarmai, Ralf Lindner, Julia Olmos-Peñuela, Cordula Ott & Philip Shapira. (2018) Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 5:3, pages 316-331.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (75)

Gregor Wolbring & Aspen Lillywhite. (2023) Coverage of Allies, Allyship and Disabled People: A Scoping Review. Societies 13:11, pages 241.
Crossref
Ruth Mampuys. (2022) The Deadlock in European Decision-Making on GMOs as a Wicked Problem by Design: A Need for Repoliticization. Science, Technology, & Human Values 48:6, pages 1329-1359.
Crossref
Garrett M. Broad. (2023) Improving the agri-food biotechnology conversation: bridging science communication with science and technology studies. Agriculture and Human Values 40:3, pages 929-938.
Crossref
Lucy Carter, Aditi MankadElizabeth V. Hobman. (2023) Is Public Engagement in Bioengineering and Synthetic Biology Improving Research Outcomes?. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 27:2, pages 47-50.
Crossref
Annie Hammang. (2023) Troubleshooting: The Automation of Synthetic Biology and the Labor of Technological Futures. Science, Technology, & Human Values, pages 016224392211495.
Crossref
Jennifer Kuzma & Teshanee T. Williams. 2023. Democratizing Risk Governance. Democratizing Risk Governance 191 216 .
Stephanie Siewert, Katharina Kieslich, Matthias Braun & Peter DabrockStephanie Siewert, Katharina Kieslich, Matthias Braun & Peter Dabrock. 2023. Synthetic Biology and the Question of Public Participation. Synthetic Biology and the Question of Public Participation 1 6 .
Jennifer Kuzma. 2023. Cisgenic Crops: Safety, Legal and Social Issues. Cisgenic Crops: Safety, Legal and Social Issues 179 194 .
Giovanni Mian, Federico Nassivera, Sandro Sillani & Luca Iseppi. (2022) Grapevine Resistant Cultivars: A Story Review and the Importance on the Related Wine Consumption Inclination. Sustainability 15:1, pages 390.
Crossref
Yves-Marie Rault-Chodankar. (2022) ‘We care… because care is growth’. The low-tech imaginaries of India's small-scale pharmaceutical enterprises. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health 2, pages 100144.
Crossref
Delphine Thizy, Lucy Carter, Isabelle Coche, Jason A. Delborne, Claudia Emerson, Ana Kormos, Aditi Mankad, Lea Pare Toe, Aaron Roberts & Yasha Rohwer. 2022. Transgenic Insects. Transgenic Insects 474 492 .
Sara Nawaz & Terre Satterfield. (2022) On the nature of naturalness? Theorizing ‘nature’ for the study of public perceptions of novel genomic technologies in agriculture and conservation. Environmental Science & Policy 136, pages 291-303.
Crossref
Naomi Clements-Brod, Leah Holmes & Emma L. Rawlins. (2022) Exploring the challenges and opportunities of public engagement with fundamental biology. Development 149:18.
Crossref
Jennifer Kuzma. (2022) Implementing responsible research and innovation: a case study of U.S. biotechnology oversight. Global Public Policy and Governance 2:3, pages 306-325.
Crossref
Samantha Vanderslott, Luisa Enria, Alex Bowmer, Abass Kamara & Shelley Lees. (2022) Attributing public ignorance in vaccination narratives. Social Science & Medicine 307, pages 115152.
Crossref
Lea L Skovgaard & Klaus Hoeyer. (2022) Data authority: Public debate about personalized medicine in Denmark. Public Understanding of Science 31:5, pages 590-607.
Crossref
Jacqueline Dalziell & Wendy Rogers. (2022) Are the Ethics of Synthetic Biology Fit for Purpose? A Case Study of Artemisinin. Proceedings of the IEEE 110:5, pages 511-517.
Crossref
Raymond J. St. Leger. (2021) From the Lab to the Last Mile: Deploying Transgenic Approaches Against Mosquitoes. Frontiers in Tropical Diseases 2.
Crossref
Julie Guthman & Charlotte Biltekoff. (2020) Magical disruption? Alternative protein and the promise of de-materialization. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 4:4, pages 1583-1600.
Crossref
Jennifer Kuzma. (2021) Deficits of Public Deliberation in U.S. Oversight for Gene Edited Organisms. Hastings Center Report 51:S2.
Crossref
Shannon Colville, John Steen & Raymond Gosine. (2021) Do public review processes reflect public input? A study of hydraulic fracturing reviews in Australia and Canada. Energy Policy 155, pages 112303.
Crossref
Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent. (2021) From Nano Backlash to Public Indifference: Some Reflections on French Public Dialogues on Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 15:2, pages 191-201.
Crossref
Massimiliano Borrello, Luigi Cembalo & Riccardo Vecchio. (2021) Role of information in consumers’ preferences for eco-sustainable genetic improvements in plant breeding. PLOS ONE 16:7, pages e0255130.
Crossref
Monika Djerf-Pierre & Mia Lindgren. (2021) Making sense of “superbugs” on YouTube: A storytelling approach. Public Understanding of Science 30:5, pages 535-551.
Crossref
T.S.G.H. Rodhouse, U. Pesch, E.H.W.J. Cuppen & A.F. Correljé. (2021) Public agency and responsibility in energy governance: A Q study on diverse imagined publics in the Dutch heat transition. Energy Research & Social Science 77, pages 102046.
Crossref
Jennifer Kuzma & Christopher L. Cummings. (2021) Cultural Beliefs and Stakeholder Affiliation Influence Attitudes Towards Responsible Research and Innovation Among United States Stakeholders Involved in Biotechnology and Gene Editing. Frontiers in Political Science 3.
Crossref
Justice T. Walker & Yasmin B. Kafai. (2021) The biodesign studio: Constructions and reflections of high school youth on making with living media. British Journal of Educational Technology 52:3, pages 1116-1129.
Crossref
Maaz Gardezi & Ryan Stock. (2021) Growing algorithmic governmentality: Interrogating the social construction of trust in precision agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies 84, pages 1-11.
Crossref
L. Carter, A. Mankad, E. V. Hobman & N. B. Porter. (2021) Playing God and tampering with nature: popular labels for real concerns in synthetic biology. Transgenic Research 30:2, pages 155-167.
Crossref
Jack A. Heinemann, Deborah J. Paull, Sophie Walker & Brigitta Kurenbach. (2021) Differentiated impacts of human interventions on nature. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 9:1.
Crossref
Silvia Camporesi & Giulia Cavaliere. (2021) Can bioethics be an honest way of making a living? A reflection on normativity, governance and expertise. Journal of Medical Ethics 47:3, pages 159-163.
Crossref
Eefje Cuppen & Udo Pesch. 2021. A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructures. A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructures 161 178 .
Emma Frow. (2017) From “Experiments of Concern” to “Groups of Concern”: Constructing and Containing Citizens in Synthetic Biology. Science, Technology, & Human Values 45:6, pages 1038-1064.
Crossref
Sofía Vargas-Payera, Amanda Martínez-Reyes & Olivier Ejderyan. (2020) Factors and dynamics of the social perception of geothermal energy: Case study of the Tolhuaca exploration project in Chile. Geothermics 88, pages 101907.
Crossref
Lauren Swiney. (2020) Intuitive biology, moral reasoning, and engineering life: Essentialist thinking and moral purity concerns shape risk assessments of synthetic biology technologies. Cognition 201, pages 104264.
Crossref
Rim Lassoued, Diego Maximiliano Macall, Stuart J. Smyth, Peter W.B. Phillips & Hayley Hesseln. (2020) How should we regulate products of new breeding techniques? Opinion of surveyed experts in plant biotechnology. Biotechnology Reports 26, pages e00460.
Crossref
Anna Froese & Natalie Mevissen. (2019) Failure through Success: Co-construction Processes of Imaginaries (of Participation) and Group Development. Science, Technology, & Human Values 45:3, pages 455-487.
Crossref
Pat Roberts, Joseph Herkert & Jennifer Kuzma. (2020) Responsible innovation in biotechnology: Stakeholder attitudes and implications for research policy. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 8.
Crossref
Claire Marris & Jane Calvert. (2019) Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap. Science, Technology, & Human Values 45:1, pages 34-61.
Crossref
Erik Fisher. 2020. TechnoScienceSociety. TechnoScienceSociety 177 189 .
Benjamin D. Trump. 2020. Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance. Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance 85 105 .
Emily L. Howell, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard, Michael A. Xenos, Seokbeom Kwon, Jan Youtie & Philip Shapira. 2020. Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance. Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance 371 387 .
Benjamin D. Trump, Christopher L. Cummings, S. E. Galaitsi, Jennifer Kuzma & Igor Linkov. 2020. Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance. Synthetic Biology 2020: Frontiers in Risk Analysis and Governance 1 18 .
Josemari Quevedo, António Carvalho, Paulo Fonseca & João Arriscado Nunes. (2019) Ciência, tecnologias emergentes e sociedade : o caso dos debates sobre nanotecnologias em PortugalScience, emerging technologies and society : the case of the debates on nanotechnologies in Portugal. Forum Sociológico:35, pages 73-81.
Crossref
Paraskevas Vezyridis & Stephen Timmons. (2019) Resisting big data exploitations in public healthcare: free riding or distributive justice?. Sociology of Health & Illness 41:8, pages 1585-1599.
Crossref
George Profitiliotis & Maria Loizidou. (2019) Planetary Protection Issues of Private Endeavors in Research, Exploration, and Human Access to Space: An Environmental Economics Approach to Backward Contamination. Space Policy 50, pages 101332.
Crossref
Rim Lassoued, Diego Maximiliano Macall, Stuart J. Smyth, Peter W.B. Phillips & Hayley Hesseln. (2019) Risk and safety considerations of genome edited crops: Expert opinion. Current Research in Biotechnology 1, pages 11-21.
Crossref
Michael Morrison & Stevienna de Saille. (2019) CRISPR in context: towards a socially responsible debate on embryo editing. Palgrave Communications 5:1.
Crossref
Robert Meckin & Andrew Balmer. (2018) Situating anticipation in everyday life: Using sensory methods to explore public expectations of synthetic biology. Public Understanding of Science 28:3, pages 290-304.
Crossref
Brian Lovett, Etienne Bilgo, Abdoulaye Diabate & Raymond St. Leger. (2019) A review of progress toward field application of transgenic mosquitocidal entomopathogenic fungi. Pest Management Science.
Crossref
Debora LuiYasmin B. KafaiJustice T. WalkerSheri HannaKaren HoganOrkan Telhan. (2019) A Revaluation of How We Think about Making. A Revaluation of How We Think about Making.
Barbara Ribeiro & Philip Shapira. (2019) Anticipating governance challenges in synthetic biology: Insights from biosynthetic menthol. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139, pages 311-320.
Crossref
Lauren Swiney, Declan G. Bates & John D. Coley. (2018) Cognitive Constraints Shape Public Debate on the Risks of Synthetic Biology. Trends in Biotechnology 36:12, pages 1199-1201.
Crossref
Emily Dawson. (2018) Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income, minority ethnic groups. Public Understanding of Science 27:7, pages 772-786.
Crossref
Benjamin D Trump, Jeffrey C Cegan, Emily Wells, Jeffrey Keisler & Igor Linkov. (2018) A critical juncture for synthetic biology. EMBO reports 19:7.
Crossref
Pru Hobson-West & Ashley Davies. (2017) Societal Sentience. Science, Technology, & Human Values 43:4, pages 671-693.
Crossref
Erika Amethyst Szymanski. (2018) What Is the Terroir of Synthetic Yeast?. Environmental Humanities 10:1, pages 40-62.
Crossref
Lisa M. PytlikZillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Frank J. Gonzalez & Alan J. TomkinsLisa M. PytlikZillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Frank J. Gonzalez & Alan J. Tomkins. 2018. Deliberative Public Engagement with Science. Deliberative Public Engagement with Science 1 17 .
Erica Haimes & Ken Taylor. (2017) Sharpening the cutting edge: additional considerations for the UK debates on embryonic interventions for mitochondrial diseases. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13:1.
Crossref
Giulia Cavaliere. (2017) A 14-day limit for bioethics: the debate over human embryo research. BMC Medical Ethics 18:1.
Crossref
Yevgeniya Tomkiv, Astrid Liland, Deborah H. Oughton & Brian Wynne. (2019) Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 37:3, pages 167-178.
Crossref
Christian Ineichen, Nikola Biller-Andorno & Anna Deplazes-Zemp. (2017) Image of Synthetic Biology and Nanotechnology: A Survey among University Students. Frontiers in Genetics 8.
Crossref
Carmen McLeod, Brigitte Nerlich & Alison Mohr. (2017) Working with bacteria and putting bacteria to work: The biopolitics of synthetic biology for energy in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 30, pages 35-42.
Crossref
Weston M. Eaton, Morey Burnham, C. Clare Hinrichs & Theresa Selfa. (2017) Bioenergy experts and their imagined “obligatory publics” in the United States: Implications for public engagement and participation. Energy Research & Social Science 25, pages 65-75.
Crossref
Miranda Boettcher & Stefan Schäfer. (2017) Reflecting upon 10 years of geoengineering research: Introduction to the Crutzen + 10 special issue. Earth's Future 5:3, pages 266-277.
Crossref
Mirko Ancillotti, Niklas Holmberg, Mikael Lindfelt & Stefan Eriksson. (2016) Uncritical and unbalanced coverage of synthetic biology in the Nordic press. Public Understanding of Science 26:2, pages 235-250.
Crossref
Mirko Ancillotti, Virgil Rerimassie, Stefanie B. Seitz & Walburg Steurer. (2016) An Update of Public Perceptions of Synthetic Biology: Still Undecided?. NanoEthics 10:3, pages 309-325.
Crossref
Phil Macnaghten, Richard Owen & Roland Jackson. (2016) Synthetic biology and the prospects for responsible innovation. Essays in Biochemistry 60:4, pages 347-355.
Crossref
Gregor Wolbring & Lucy Diep. (2016) The Discussions around Precision Genetic Engineering: Role of and Impact on Disabled People. Laws 5:3, pages 37.
Crossref
Kristin Hagen. (2016) Science Policy and Concomitant Research in Synthetic Biology—Some Critical Thoughts. NanoEthics 10:2, pages 201-213.
Crossref
Sacha Loeve. 2016. Synthetic Biology. Synthetic Biology 155 184 .
Rafael Pardo Avellaneda & Kristin Hagen. 2016. Synthetic Biology Analysed. Synthetic Biology Analysed 127 170 .
Britt Wray. 2016. Ambivalences of Creating Life. Ambivalences of Creating Life 177 197 .
Richard Kelwick, Laura Bowater, Kay H. Yeoman & Richard P. Bowater. (2015) Promoting microbiology education through the iGEM synthetic biology competition. FEMS Microbiology Letters 362:16, pages fnv129.
Crossref
Lomax Boyd & Britt Wray. (2018) Engaging and Co-authoring with Science Publics Online: Interactive Documentaries as Emergent Models of Science Communication. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref