Citations (20)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (7)
John E. Marsh, François Vachon, Patrik Sörqvist, Erik Marsja, Jan P. Röer, Beth H. Richardson & Jessica K. Ljungberg. (2023) Irrelevant changing-state vibrotactile stimuli disrupt verbal serial recall: implications for theories of interference in short-term memory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 0:0, pages 1-23.
Read now
Read now
Nick Perham, Fahena Begum & John E. Marsh. (2023) The Categorical Deviation Effect May Be Underpinned by Attentional Capture: Preliminary Evidence from the Incidental Recognition of Distracters. Auditory Perception & Cognition 6:1-2, pages 20-51.
Read now
Read now
Bozana Meinhardt-Injac, Margarete Imhof, Nicole Wetzel, Maria Klatte & Sabine J. Schlittmeier. (2022) The Irrelevant Sound Effect on Serial Recall Is Independent of Age and Inhibitory Control. Auditory Perception & Cognition 5:1-2, pages 25-45.
Read now
Read now
Philip Morgan, Bill Macken, Alexander Toet, Aline Bompas, Mark Bray, Simon Rushton & Dylan Jones. (2020) Distraction for the eye and ear. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 21:6, pages 633-657.
Read now
Read now
Angela M AuBuchon, Corey I. McGill & Emily M. Elliott. (2020) Decomposing the Role of Rehearsal in Auditory Distraction during Serial Recall. Auditory Perception & Cognition 3:1-2, pages 18-32.
Read now
Read now
Nick Perham, Carly Whelpley & Helen Hodgetts. (2013) Impaired memory for syntactical information
in poor readers. Memory 21:2, pages 182-188.
Read now
Read now
Nick Perham & Stephanie Macpherson. (2012) Mental arithmetic and irrelevant auditory number similarity disruption. The Irish Journal of Psychology 33:4, pages 181-192.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (13)
Florian Kattner, Sarah Hanl, Linda Paul & Wolfgang Ellermeier. (2022) Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition 51:4, pages 930-951.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Perham, Toni Howell & Andy Watt. (2019) Can a simple, short-term memory task help to screen dyslexia?. Current Psychology 41:1, pages 360-368.
Crossref
Crossref
Helena Jahncke & David M. Hallman. (2020) Objective measures of cognitive performance in activity based workplaces and traditional office types. Journal of Environmental Psychology 72, pages 101503.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Perham, John E. Marsh, Martin Clarkson, Rosie Lawrence & Patrik Sörqvist. (2016) Distraction of Mental Arithmetic by Background Speech. Experimental Psychology 63:3, pages 141-149.
Crossref
Crossref
Patrik Sörqvist. (2015) On interpretation and task selection: the sub-component hypothesis of cognitive noise effects. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Perham & Harriet Currie. (2014) Does listening to preferred music improve reading comprehension performance?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28:2, pages 279-284.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Perham & Martinne Sykora. (2012) Disliked Music can be Better for Performance than Liked Music. Applied Cognitive Psychology 26:4, pages 550-555.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Perham & Tom Withey. (2012) Liked Music Increases Spatial Rotation Performance Regardless of Tempo. Current Psychology 31:2, pages 168-181.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Perham & James Rosser. (2012) “Not Thinking” Helps Reasoning. Current Psychology 31:2, pages 160-167.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Perham & Joanne Vizard. (2011) Can preference for background music mediate the irrelevant sound effect?. Applied Cognitive Psychology 25:4, pages 625-631.
Crossref
Crossref
Patrik Sörqvist. (2010) High working memory capacity attenuates the deviation effect but not the changing-state effect: Further support for the duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Memory & Cognition 38:5, pages 651-658.
Crossref
Crossref
John E. Marsh, Robert W. Hughes & Dylan M. Jones. (2009) Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition 110:1, pages 23-38.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Perham & Simon Banbury. (2008) You Cannot Ignore It: Attention to ‘Irrelevant’ Sound during a Pre-exposure Period Does Not Reduce its Disruption of Serial Recall. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 52:19, pages 1622-1626.
Crossref
Crossref