Citations (14)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Laura A. Martinelli, Sam N Thrower, Andrew Heyes, Ian D. Boardley, Susan H. Backhouse & Andrea Petróczi. (2023) The good, the bad, and the ugly: A qualitative secondary analysis into the impact of doping and anti-doping on clean elite athletes in five European countries. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 15:1, pages 3-22.
Read now
Read now
Jim Krugers & Maarten van Bottenburg. (2022) Sample collection as a social process: the influence of interaction between doping control officers and athletes on the implementation of anti-doping policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 14:2, pages 353-368.
Read now
Read now
Tamara Stotz, Angela Bearth, Signe Maria Ghelfi & Michael Siegrist. (2021) Keep the status quo: randomization-based security checks might reduce crime deterrence at airports. Journal of Risk Research 24:12, pages 1589-1604.
Read now
Read now
Przemysław G. Hensel & Agnieszka Kacprzak. (2021) Curbing cyberloafing: studying general and specific deterrence effects with field evidence. European Journal of Information Systems 30:2, pages 219-235.
Read now
Read now
Geoff Bates, David Tod, Conan Leavey & Jim McVeigh. (2019) An evidence-based socioecological framework to understand men’s use of anabolic androgenic steroids and inform interventions in this area. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 26:6, pages 484-492.
Read now
Read now
Daniela Lux & Anders Schmidt Vinther. Anti-Doping research: What is left to do?. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 0:0, pages 1-5.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (8)
Seyyedeh Masoomeh Shadmanfaat, Saeed Kabiri, Hayden P Smith, John K Cochran, Tia Stevens Andersen & Javad Madahi. (2023) Coaching and Doping: A Test of Situational Action Theory. Journal of Drug Issues, pages 002204262311792.
Crossref
Crossref
Fredrik Lauritzen & Geir Holden. (2023) Intelligence‐based doping control planning improves testing effectiveness: Perspectives from a national anti‐doping organisation. Drug Testing and Analysis 15:5, pages 506-515.
Crossref
Crossref
Jules A. A. C. Heuberger, April Henning, Adam F. Cohen & Bengt Kayser. (2021) Dealing with doping. A plea for better science, governance and education. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 88:2, pages 566-578.
Crossref
Crossref
Cornelia Blank, Magdalena Flatscher-Thöni, Katharina Gatterer, Elisabeth Happ, Wolfgang Schobersberger & Verena Stühlinger. (2021) Doping Sanctions in Sport: Knowledge and Perception of (Legal) Consequences of Doping—An Explorative Study in Austria. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14:12, pages 603.
Crossref
Crossref
Toby Woolway, Lambros Lazuras, Vassilis Barkoukis & Andrea Petróczi. (2020) “Doing What Is Right and Doing It Right”: A Mapping Review of Athletes' Perception of Anti-Doping Legitimacy. International Journal of Drug Policy 84, pages 102865.
Crossref
Crossref
Marie Overbye. (2020) WITHDRAWN: WADA’s Prohibited List from the perspective of elite athletes. Performance Enhancement & Health, pages 100165.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Westmattelmann, Dennis Dreiskämper, Bernd Strauß, Gerhard Schewe & Jonas Plass. (2018) Perception of the Current Anti-doping Regime – A Quantitative Study Among German Top-Level Cyclists and Track and Field Athletes. Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Crossref
Crossref
Perikles SimonElmo WI NeubergerGuan Wang & Yannis P. Pitsiladis. (2018) Antidoping Science: Important Lessons From the Medical Sciences. Current Sports Medicine Reports 17:10, pages 326-331.
Crossref
Crossref