Advanced search
Publication Cover
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Volume 21, 2014 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,153
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using digital representations of practical production work for summative assessment

C. Paul NewhouseSchool of Education, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 205-220 | Received 27 Feb 2013, Accepted 19 Nov 2013, Published online: 02 Jan 2014

Citations (19)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (8)

Jeffrey Buckley, Donal Canty & Niall Seery. (2022) An exploration into the criteria used in assessing design activities with adaptive comparative judgment in technology education. Irish Educational Studies 41:2, pages 313-331.
Read now
Christopher N. Blundell. (2021) Teacher use of digital technologies for school-based assessment: a scoping review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 28:3, pages 279-300.
Read now
Scott R. Bartholomew, Liwei Zhang, Esteban Garcia Bravo & Greg J. Strimel. (2019) A Tool for Formative Assessment and Learning in a Graphics Design Course: Adaptive Comparative Judgement. The Design Journal 22:1, pages 73-95.
Read now
Tom Bramley & Sylvia Vitello. (2019) The effect of adaptivity on the reliability coefficient in adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 26:1, pages 43-58.
Read now
Scott R. Bartholomew, Louis S. Nadelson, Wade H. Goodridge & Edward M. Reeve. (2018) Adaptive Comparative Judgment as a Tool for Assessing Open-ended Design Problems and Model Eliciting Activities. Educational Assessment 23:2, pages 85-101.
Read now
Pina Tarricone & C. Paul Newhouse. (2017) An Investigation of the Reliability of Using Comparative Judgment to Score Creative Products. Educational Assessment 22:4, pages 220-230.
Read now
Daniel K. Acquah & Debra Malpass. (2017) The technical baccalaureate: providing excellence in vocational education?. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 24:1, pages 96-117.
Read now
Suzanne McMahon & Ian Jones. (2015) A comparative judgement approach to teacher assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 22:3, pages 368-389.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (11)

Diego Calderón-Garrido, Raquel Gil-Fernández & Carolina Martín-Piñol. (2023) Exploring Perspectives, Uses, Implications and Needs of the Educational Digital Portfolio in the Arts: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature. SAGE Open 13:3.
Crossref
Su-Pin Hung & Hung-Yu Huang. (2022) Forced-Choice Ranking Models for Raters’ Ranking Data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 47:5, pages 603-634.
Crossref
Jeffrey Buckley, Niall Seery & Richard Kimbell. (2022) A Review of the Valid Methodological Use of Adaptive Comparative Judgment in Technology Education Research. Frontiers in Education 7.
Crossref
Elise A. V. Crompvoets, Anton A. Béguin & Klaas Sijtsma. (2022) On the Bias and Stability of the Results of Comparative Judgment. Frontiers in Education 6.
Crossref
San Verhavert, Antony Furlong & Renske Bouwer. (2022) The Accuracy and Efficiency of a Reference-Based Adaptive Selection Algorithm for Comparative Judgment. Frontiers in Education 6.
Crossref
Eva Hartell & Jeffrey Buckley. 2021. Handbook for Online Learning Contexts: Digital, Mobile and Open. Handbook for Online Learning Contexts: Digital, Mobile and Open 289 307 .
Elise A. V. Crompvoets, Anton A. Béguin & Klaas Sijtsma. (2019) Adaptive Pairwise Comparison for Educational Measurement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 45:3, pages 316-338.
Crossref
Ian Jones, Marie Bisson, Camilla Gilmore & Matthew Inglis. (2019) Measuring conceptual understanding in randomised controlled trials: Can comparative judgement help?. British Educational Research Journal 45:3, pages 662-680.
Crossref
C. Paul Newhouse & Pina Tarricone. (2017) Using Pairwise Comparisons in the Online Social Moderation of Performance Assessment. Using Pairwise Comparisons in the Online Social Moderation of Performance Assessment.
Pina Tarricone & C. Paul Newhouse. (2016) A study of the use of pairwise comparison in the context of social online moderation. The Australian Educational Researcher 43:3, pages 273-288.
Crossref
C. Paul Newhouse. 2016. Learning, Design, and Technology. Learning, Design, and Technology 1 29 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.