Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of the Legal Profession Volume 15, 2008 - Issue 1-2
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,291
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

What a difference difference makes: gendered harms and judicial diversity

Erika Rackley Durham Law School, Durham, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 37-56 | Published online: 10 Nov 2008

Citations (10)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (2)

Ulrike Schultz. (2022) Gender and potential impacts on decision-making in arbitration: experiences from Germany in an international field. International Journal of the Legal Profession 29:1, pages 53-74.
Read now
Anqi Shen. (2020) Women judges who judge women offenders: a Chinese case study on gender and judging. International Journal of the Legal Profession 27:1, pages 63-79.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (8)

Rachel Cahill-O'Callaghan & Heather Roberts. (2021) Hidden depths: diversity, difference and the High Court of Australia. International Journal of Law in Context 17:4, pages 494-511.
Crossref
Ulrike Schultz. 2021. Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific. Women and the Judiciary in the Asia-Pacific 291 302 .
Amelia Thorpe & Sue Williamson. (2021) Trusted institutions: Expertise, gender, and legitimacy on planning panels. Australian Journal of Public Administration 80:3, pages 638-644.
Crossref
Richard Hedlund. (2020) The end to testamentary freedom. Legal Studies 41:1, pages 55-72.
Crossref
Francesca Bartlett & Heather Douglas. (2018) ‘Benchmarking’ a Supreme Court and Federal Court judge in Australia. Oñati Socio-legal Series 8:9, pages 1355-1385.
Crossref
Anqi ShenAnqi Shen. 2017. Women Judges in Contemporary China. Women Judges in Contemporary China 135 176 .
Sharyn Roach Anleu & Kathy Mack. (2009) Gender, Judging and Job Satisfaction. Feminist Legal Studies 17:1, pages 79-99.
Crossref
Erika Rackley. (2009) Detailing Judicial Difference. Feminist Legal Studies 17:1, pages 11-26.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.