Citations (10)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Nicholas S. Paliewicz. (2014) Taking It to the Streets: The Rhetorical Mobility of Expert Arguments in Public Settings. Argumentation and Advocacy 51:1, pages 42-57.
Read now
Read now
Danielle Endres. (2012) Sacred Land or National Sacrifice Zone: The Role of Values in the Yucca Mountain Participation Process. Environmental Communication 6:3, pages 328-345.
Read now
Read now
Jason Johnson. (2010) On using humor to market higher education: at whose expense is the clowning?. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 20:2, pages 241-257.
Read now
Read now
Anna
Kimberly Turnage. (2009) Scene, Act, and the Tragic Frame in the Duke Rape Case. Southern Communication Journal 74:2, pages 141-156.
Read now
Read now
Danielle Endres. (2009) Science and Public Participation: An Analysis of Public Scientific Argument in the Yucca Mountain Controversy. Environmental Communication 3:1, pages 49-75.
Read now
Read now
Shawn Batt. (2003) Keeping Company in Controversy: Education Reform, Spheres of Argument, and Ethical Criticism. Argumentation and Advocacy 40:2, pages 85-104.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (4)
BRYAN C. TAYLOR. (2007) “The Means to Match Their Hatred”: Nuclear Weapons, Rhetorical Democracy, and Presidential Discourse. Presidential Studies Quarterly 37:4, pages 667-692.
Crossref
Crossref
Jennifer Kam & Joanna Eidsmore. 2007. Diversity. Diversity
111
124
.
Bryan C. Taylor, William J. Kinsella, Stephen P. Depoe & Maribeth S. Metzler. (2005) Chapter 12: Nuclear Legacies: Communication, Controversy, and the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Production Complex. Communication Yearbook 29:1, pages 363-409.
Crossref
Crossref
Karen Tracy & Aaron Dimock. (2004) Chapter 4: Meetings: Discursive Sites for Building and Fragmenting Community. Communication Yearbook 28:1, pages 127-165.
Crossref
Crossref