Citations (25)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (9)
Lee J. Curley, Jennifer Murray, Rory MacLean, James Munro, Martin Lages, Lara A. Frumkin, Phyllis Laybourn & David Brown. (2022) Verdict spotting: investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 29:3, pages 323-344.
Read now
Read now
James M. Binnall & Nick Petersen. (2020) Building Biased Jurors: Exposing the Circularity of the Inherent Bias Rationale for Felon-Juror Exclusion. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 27:1, pages 110-125.
Read now
Read now
Charlotte Scobie, C. Semmler & M. Proeve. (2019) Considering forensic science: individual differences, opposing expert testimony and juror decision making. Psychology, Crime & Law 25:1, pages 23-49.
Read now
Read now
Len Lecci & Alexia Martin. (2018) The Impact of Clinical Diagnosis and Plaintiff's Award Request on Mock Juror Damage Awards and Injury Perceptions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 25:4, pages 522-538.
Read now
Read now
Suzanne Blackwell & Fred Seymour. (2014) Prediction of Jury Verdicts in Child Sexual Assault Trials. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 21:4, pages 567-576.
Read now
Read now
Lisa L. Smith & Ray Bull. (2014) Validation of the factor structure and predictive validity of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale for robbery and sexual assault trial scenarios. Psychology, Crime & Law 20:5, pages 450-466.
Read now
Read now
LisaL. Smith & Ray Bull. (2012) Identifying and measuring juror pre-trial bias for forensic evidence: development and validation of the Forensic Evidence Evaluation Bias Scale. Psychology, Crime & Law 18:9, pages 797-815.
Read now
Read now
LenB. Lecci & Bryan Myers. (2009) Predicting guilt judgments and verdict change using a measure of pretrial bias in a videotaped mock trial with deliberating jurors. Psychology, Crime & Law 15:7, pages 619-634.
Read now
Read now
Ma Eva Martín, Leticia De La Fuente, E. Inmaculada De La Fuente & Juan García. (2007) The influence of sample type, presentation format and strength of evidence on juror simulation research. Psychology, Crime & Law 13:2, pages 139-153.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (16)
Jimin Pyo. (2023) Confidence in criminal justice and judgments of guilt in criminal trials. Criminology & Criminal Justice.
Crossref
Crossref
Lee J. Curley, James Munro & Itiel E. Dror. (2022) Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making. Medicine, Science and the Law 62:3, pages 206-215.
Crossref
Crossref
Lee J Curley, Jennifer Murray, Rory MacLean, Phyllis Laybourn & David Brown. (2018) Faith in thy threshold. Medicine, Science and the Law 58:4, pages 239-250.
Crossref
Crossref
Victoria C. Estrada-Reynolds, Jennifer M. Gray & Narina Nuñez. (2015) Information Integration Theory, Juror Bias, and Sentence Recommendations Captured Over Time in a Capital Trial. Applied Cognitive Psychology 29:5, pages 713-722.
Crossref
Crossref
James M. Binnall. (2014) A Field Study of the Presumptively Biased: Is There Empirical Support for Excluding Convicted Felons from Jury Service?. Law & Policy 36:1, pages 1-34.
Crossref
Crossref
Margaret Bull Kovera. 2012. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition.
. 2012. Introduction to Forensic Psychology. Introduction to Forensic Psychology
615
679
.
David Tait. (2011) Deliberating about terrorism: Prejudice and jury verdicts in a mock terrorism trial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 44:3, pages 387-403.
Crossref
Crossref
Candy Sabatier, Georges Schadron, Isabelle Milhabet & Daniel Priolo. (2010) La déterminabilité de « celui qui juge » : impact sur l’orientation d’un jugement et sur la formation d’impression. L’Année psychologique Vol. 110:4, pages 573-593.
Crossref
Crossref
Margaret Bull Kovera & Eugene Borgida. 2010. Handbook of Social Psychology. Handbook of Social Psychology.
Pedro ÁlvarezEmilia I. De la Fuente, Juan García & Leticia De la Fuente. (2008) Psychosocial Variables in the Determination of the Verdict Object in Trials for Environmental Crimes in Spain. Environment and Behavior 41:4, pages 509-525.
Crossref
Crossref
Connie M. TangNarina Nunez & Martin Bourgeois. (2008) Effects of Trial Venue and Pretrial Bias on the Evaluation of Juvenile Defendants. Criminal Justice Review 34:2, pages 210-225.
Crossref
Crossref
Rémi Finkelstein & Marina Bastounis. (2009) The effect of the deliberation process and jurors' prior legal knowledge on the sentence: the role of psychological expertise and crime scene photo. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, pages n/a-n/a.
Crossref
Crossref
. 2005. Introduction to Forensic Psychology. Introduction to Forensic Psychology
495
550
.
C. Mazé, R. Finkelstein & M. Quentin. (2004) Un jury sous influence : l’impact des affects, du type d’expertise et des circonstances aggravantes sur l’activité décisionnelle des jurés. Psychologie Française 49:4, pages 357-372.
Crossref
Crossref
Connie M. Tang & Narina Nunez. (2003) Effects of defendant age and juror bias on judgment of culpability: What happens when a juvenile is tried as an adult?. American Journal of Criminal Justice 28:1, pages 37-52.
Crossref
Crossref