2,577
Views
57
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Imposing cognitive load to elicit cues to deceit: inducing the reverse order technique naturally

, , &
Pages 579-594 | Received 10 Jan 2010, Accepted 12 Aug 2010, Published online: 14 Jun 2011

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (8)

Cody Porter, Ed Morrison, Alistair Harvey & Rachel Taylor. (2023) Complications and consistency: investigating the asymmetric information management ‘AIM’ technique with follow-up statements. Psychology, Crime & Law 0:0, pages 1-23.
Read now
Joshua Wyman, Donia Tong, Ida Foster, Angela Crossman & Victoria Talwar. (2022) The effectiveness of cognitive instructions when children provide true and false eyewitness reports of another’s transgression. Police Practice and Research 23:3, pages 290-307.
Read now
Thorsten Lange, Raoul Bell & Axel Buchner. (2020) Differential mnemonic consistency differs between experienced and fabricated incidents. Psychology, Crime & Law 26:10, pages 990-1005.
Read now
Charlotte A. Hudson, Aldert Vrij, Lucy Akehurst & Lorraine Hope. (2019) The devil is in the detail: deception and consistency over repeated interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law 25:7, pages 752-770.
Read now
Letizia Caso, Nicola Palena, Aldert Vrij & Augusto Gnisci. (2019) Observers’ performance at evaluating truthfulness when provided with comparable truth or small talk baselines. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 26:4, pages 571-579.
Read now
Ian J. Watkins & Kristy A. Martire. (2015) Generalized linear mixed models for deception research: avoiding problematic data aggregation. Psychology, Crime & Law 21:9, pages 821-835.
Read now
Kevin Colwell, Neslihan James-Kangal, Cheryl Hiscock-Anisman & Vivian Phelan. (2015) Should Police Use ACID? Training and Credibility Assessment Using Transcripts Versus Recordings. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 15:3, pages 226-247.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (49)

Laure Brimbal, Angela M. Jones & Elizabeth A. Quinby. (2023) Does telling a story in reverse elicit cues to deceit? A replication and extension of Vrij, Leal, Mann and Fisher (2012). Legal and Criminological Psychology.
Crossref
Coral J. Dando, Paul J. Taylor & Alexandra L. Sandham. (2023) Cross cultural verbal cues to deception: truth and lies in first and second language forensic interview contexts. Frontiers in Psychology 14.
Crossref
Chaocao Yang, Xuqun You, Xudong Xie, Yuanyuan Duan, Buxue Wang, Yuxi Zhou, Hong Feng, Wenjing Wang, Ling Fan, Genying Huang & Xunbing Shen. (2023) Development of a Chinese werewolf deception database. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Sanjeev P. Sahni & Lukus Langan. 2023. Kriminalpsychologie und das Strafrechtssystem in Indien und darüber hinaus. Kriminalpsychologie und das Strafrechtssystem in Indien und darüber hinaus 195 207 .
Eduardo Pérez-Campos Mayoral, Ronald Fisher, Arre Anne Langer, Eduardo Lorenzo Pérez-Campos, Laura Pérez-Campos Mayoral, María Teresa Hernandez-Huerta & Carlos Alberto Matias-Cervantes. (2022) Leading Interview and Interrogation Techniques. Focus on Cognitive Interview. European Polygraph 16:1, pages 45-63.
Crossref
Markus M. Thielgen, Stefan Schade & Patrick Niegisch. (2022) Police Officers’ Interrogation Expertise and Major Objectives in Police Service and Training: A Comprehensive Overview of the Literature. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Yingliang Zhang & Xiaoqin Mai. (2022) The cognitive neural network model of deception. Chinese Science Bulletin 67:13, pages 1423-1435.
Crossref
Haneen Deeb, Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal & Samantha Mann. (2021) Combining the model statement and the sketching while narrating interview techniques to elicit information and detect lies in multiple interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology 35:6, pages 1478-1491.
Crossref
Jing Liang, Qian-Nan Ruan, Ke-Ke Fu, Yu-Hsin Chen & Wen-Jing Yan. (2021) The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Emotional Valence on Limited Attentional Resources During Deception: An ERPs Study. Frontiers in Neuroscience 15.
Crossref
Sanjeev P. Sahni & Lukus Langan. 2021. Criminal Psychology and the Criminal Justice System in India and Beyond. Criminal Psychology and the Criminal Justice System in India and Beyond 173 184 .
Haneen Deeb, Aldert Vrij & Sharon Leal. (2020) The effects of a model statement on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews. Acta Psychologica 207, pages 103080.
Crossref
Aldert Vrij, Samantha Mann, Sharon Leal, Ronald P. Fisher & Haneen Deeb. (2020) Sketching while narrating as a tool to detect deceit. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34:3, pages 628-642.
Crossref
Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, Haneen Deeb, Stephanie Chan, Majeed Khader, Whistine Chai & Jeffery Chin. (2019) Lying about flying: The efficacy of the information protocol and model statement for detecting deceit. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34:1, pages 241-255.
Crossref
Glynis Bogaard, Kevin Colwell & Samantha Crans. (2019) Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria‐Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 33:6, pages 1018-1031.
Crossref
Joshua Wyman, Ida Foster, Angela Crossman, Kevin Colwell & Victoria Talwar. (2019) The efficacy of free‐recall, cognitive load, and closed‐ended questions when children are asked to falsely testify about a crime. Applied Cognitive Psychology 33:4, pages 544-560.
Crossref
Sophie van der Zee, Ronald Poppe, Paul J. Taylor & Ross Anderson. (2019) To freeze or not to freeze: A culture-sensitive motion capture approach to detecting deceit. PLOS ONE 14:4, pages e0215000.
Crossref
Jacob De Rosa, Cheryl Hiscock‐Anisman, Adam Blythe, Glynis Bogaard, Ashley Hally & Kevin Colwell. (2018) A comparison of different investigative interviewing techniques in generating differential recall enhancement and detecting deception. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 16:1, pages 44-58.
Crossref
Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrij, Haneen Deeb & Louise Jupe. (2018) Using the model statement to elicit verbal differences between truth tellers and liars: The benefit of examining core and peripheral details.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 7:4, pages 610-617.
Crossref
Joanne Richards & Rebecca Milne. 2018. The Wiley Handbook of Memory, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and the Law. The Wiley Handbook of Memory, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and the Law 245 269 .
Haneen Deeb, Aldert Vrij, Lorraine Hope, Samantha Mann, Pär Anders Granhag & Leif A. Strömwall. (2018) Police Officers’ Perceptions of Statement Inconsistency. Criminal Justice and Behavior 45:5, pages 644-665.
Crossref
Haneen Deeb, Aldert Vrij, Lorraine Hope, Samantha Mann, Sharon Leal, Pär Anders Granhag & Leif A. Strömwall. (2018) The Devil's Advocate approach: An interview technique for assessing consistency among deceptive and truth-telling pairs of suspects. Legal and Criminological Psychology 23:1, pages 37-52.
Crossref
Aldert Vrij. 2018. Detecting Concealed Information and Deception. Detecting Concealed Information and Deception 297 327 .
Drew A. Leins, Laura A. Zimmerman & Emily N. Polander. (2017) Observers’ Real-Time Sensitivity to Deception in Naturalistic Interviews. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 32:4, pages 319-330.
Crossref
Angela M. Jones & Laure Brimbal. (2017) Lay perceptions of interrogation techniques: Identifying the role of Belief in a Just World and Right Wing Authoritarianism. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 14:3, pages 260-280.
Crossref
Iris Blandón-Gitlin, Rafael M. López, Jaume Masip & Elise Fenn. (2017) Cognición, emoción y mentira: implicaciones para detectar el engaño. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica 27:1, pages 95-106.
Crossref
Haneen Deeb, Aldert Vrij, Lorraine Hope, Samantha Mann, Pär-Anders Granhag & Gary L. J. Lancaster. (2017) Suspects' consistency in statements concerning two events when different question formats are used. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 14:1, pages 74-87.
Crossref
Jaume Masip, Iris Blandón-Gitlin, Carmen Martínez, Carmen Herrero & Izaskun Ibabe. (2016) Strategic Interviewing to Detect Deception: Cues to Deception across Repeated Interviews. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Crossref
Jaume Masip, Iris Blandón-Gitlin, Clara de la Riva & Carmen Herrero. (2016) An empirical test of the decision to lie component of the Activation-Decision-Construction-Action Theory (ADCAT). Acta Psychologica 169, pages 45-55.
Crossref
Sabine Ströfer, Elze G. Ufkes, Matthijs L. Noordzij & Ellen Giebels. (2016) Catching a Deceiver in the Act: Processes Underlying Deception in an Interactive Interview Setting. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 41:3, pages 349-362.
Crossref
. 2016. Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment. Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment 303 310 .
Aldert Vrij, Ronald P. Fisher, Hartmut Blank, Sharon Leal & Samantha Mann. 2016. Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment. Cheating, Corruption, and Concealment 284 302 .
Eujin Hong & Si Up Kim. (2016) The Effect of Different Orders of Question on the Recalling Episodic Memory. 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격 30:2, pages 43-61.
Crossref
Julie Gawrylowicz, Samuel Fairlamb, Emily Tantot, Zehra Qureshi, Amadeus Redha & Anne M. Ridley. (2016) Does Practice Make the Perfect Liar? The Effect of Rehearsal and Increased Cognitive Load on Cues to Deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology 30:2, pages 250-259.
Crossref
Judee K. Burgoon & Norah E. Dunbar. 2016. The Social Psychology of Perceiving Others Accurately. The Social Psychology of Perceiving Others Accurately 71 97 .
Charles R. Honts & Racheal Reavy. (2015) The comparison question polygraph test: A contrast of methods and scoring. Physiology & Behavior 143, pages 15-26.
Crossref
Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrij, Lara Warmelink, Zarah Vernham & Ronald P. Fisher. (2015) You cannot hide your telephone lies: Providing a model statement as an aid to detect deception in insurance telephone calls. Legal and Criminological Psychology 20:1, pages 129-146.
Crossref
John J. Palmatier & Louis Rovner. (2015) Rejoinder to commentary on Palmatier and Rovner (2015): Credibility assessment: Preliminary Process Theory, the polygraph process, and construct validity. International Journal of Psychophysiology 95:1, pages 31-34.
Crossref
Aldert Vrij. 2014. Detecting Deception. Detecting Deception 203 229 .
Charles F. Bond, Timothy R. Levine & Maria Hartwig. 2014. Detecting Deception. Detecting Deception 37 58 .
Aldert Vrij & Pär Anders Granhag. (2014) Eliciting Information and Detecting Lies in Intelligence Interviewing: An Overview Of Recent Research. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28:6, pages 936-944.
Crossref
Emma Roos af Hjelmsäter, Lisa Öhman, Pär Anders Granhag & Aldert Vrij. (2014) ‘Mapping’ deception in adolescents: Eliciting cues to deceit through an unanticipated spatial drawing task. Legal and Criminological Psychology 19:1, pages 179-188.
Crossref
Charles R. Honts. 2014. Credibility Assessment. Credibility Assessment 131 158 .
Maria Hartwig, Pär Anders Granhag & Timothy Luke. 2014. Credibility Assessment. Credibility Assessment 1 36 .
Maria Hartwig, Christian A. Meissner & Matthew D. Semel. 2014. Investigative Interviewing. Investigative Interviewing 209 228 .
Annelies Vredeveldt, Peter J. van Koppen & Pär Anders Granhag. 2014. Investigative Interviewing. Investigative Interviewing 183 207 .
Ke Zhang, Lara A. Frumkin, Alex Stedmon & Glyn Lawson. (2013) Deception in Context: Coding Nonverbal Cues, Situational Variables and Risk of Detection. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 28:2, pages 150-161.
Crossref
Samantha Mann, Aldert Vrij, Dominic J. Shaw, Sharon Leal, Sarah Ewens, Jackie Hillman, Par Anders Granhag & Ronald P. Fisher. (2013) Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception. Legal and Criminological Psychology 18:2, pages 324-340.
Crossref
Annelies Vredeveldt & Willem A. Wagenaar. (2013) Within-Pair Consistency in Child Witnesses: The Diagnostic Value of Telling the Same Story. Applied Cognitive Psychology 27:3, pages 406-411.
Crossref
Dominic J. Shaw, Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, Samantha Mann, Jackie Hillman, Pär Anders Granhag & Ronald P. Fisher. (2013) Expect the Unexpected? Variations in Question Type Elicit Cues to Deception in Joint Interviewer Contexts. Applied Cognitive Psychology 27:3, pages 336-343.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.