Citations (19)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Chantal Chevroulet, Helen M. Paterson, Richard I. Kemp & Celine van Golde. (2022) Technology and eyewitness memory: evaluating the efficacy of a novel digital cued recall tool. Psychology, Crime & Law 0:0, pages 1-18.
Read now
Read now
Matthew D. Grilli, Sedona Coste, Janet E. Landry & Kathryn Mangen. (2019) Evidence that an episodic mode of thinking facilitates encoding of perceptually rich memories for naturalistic events relative to a gist-based mode of thinking. Memory 27:10, pages 1468-1474.
Read now
Read now
Uta Kraus, Fabian Zeier, Wolfgang Wagner, Marko Paelecke & Johannes S. Hewig. (2017) Comparing the quality of memory reports in different initial eyewitness questioning approaches. Cogent Psychology 4:1.
Read now
Read now
Kayo Matsuo & Hiroshi Miura. (2017) Effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview and Drawing Pictures for Eliciting Eyewitness Memories. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 24:5, pages 643-654.
Read now
Read now
Alana C. Krix, Melanie Sauerland, Harald Merckelbach, Fiona Gabbert & Lorraine Hope. (2015) How effective is retrieval support for witnesses with different levels of working and source memory?. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 27:3, pages 335-348.
Read now
Read now
Alana C. Krix, Melanie Sauerland, Fiona Gabbert & Lorraine Hope. (2014) Providing eyewitnesses with initial retrieval support: what works at immediate and subsequent recall?. Psychology, Crime & Law 20:10, pages 1005-1027.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (13)
Cassandre Dion Larivière, Mark D. Snow, Sydney Spyksma, Quintan Crough & Joseph Eastwood. (2023)
Testing a digital
self‐interview
approach: The virtual memory assistance tool
. Applied Cognitive Psychology 37:3, pages 624-642.
Crossref
Crossref
Fiona Gabbert, Lorraine Hope, Ruth Horry, Tyler Drain & Chelsea Hughes. (2022) Examining the efficacy of a digital version of the Self-Administered Interview. Computers in Human Behavior Reports 5, pages 100159.
Crossref
Crossref
Hiroshi Miura & Kayo Matsuo. (2021)
Does writing enhance recall and memory consolidation? Revealing the factor of effectiveness of the
self‐administered
interview
. Applied Cognitive Psychology 35:5, pages 1338-1343.
Crossref
Crossref
Ruth Horry, Chelsea Hughes, Anagha Sharma, Fiona Gabbert & Lorraine Hope. (2020)
A
meta‐analytic
review of the
Self‐Administered
Interview©: Quantity and accuracy of details reported on initial and subsequent retrieval attempts
. Applied Cognitive Psychology 35:2, pages 428-444.
Crossref
Crossref
Alena Nash, Nathan Ridout & Robert A. Nash. (2020) Facing away from the interviewer: Evidence of little benefit to eyewitnesses' memory performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34:6, pages 1310-1322.
Crossref
Crossref
Feni Kontogianni, Lorraine Hope, Paul J. Taylor, Aldert Vrij & Fiona Gabbert. (2020) “Tell me more about this…”: An examination of the efficacy of follow‐up open questions following an initial account. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34:5, pages 972-983.
Crossref
Crossref
Julie Gawrylowicz, Alan Scoboria, Rachel Teodorini & Ian P. Albery. (2018) Intoxicated eyewitnesses: The effect of a fully balanced placebo design on event memory and metacognitive control. Applied Cognitive Psychology 33:3, pages 344-357.
Crossref
Crossref
Henry Otgaar, Renate van Ansem, Carline Pauw & Robert Horselenberg. (2016) Improving Children?s Interviewing Methods? The Effects of Drawing and Practice on Children?s Memories for an Event. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 31:4, pages 279-287.
Crossref
Crossref
Alana C. Krix, Melanie Sauerland, Linsey H. C. Raymaekers, Amina Memon, Conny W. E. M. Quaedflieg & Tom Smeets. (2016) Eyewitness Evidence Obtained with the Self-Administered Interview© Is Unaffected by Stress. Applied Cognitive Psychology 30:1, pages 103-112.
Crossref
Crossref
Fiona Gabbert, Lorraine Hope, Elisabeth Carter, Roel Boon & Ronald Fisher. 2015. Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts. Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts
107
131
.
Coral J. Dando, R. Edward Geiselman, Nicci MacLeod & Andy Griffiths. 2015. Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts. Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts
79
106
.
Nina J. Westera & Martine Powell. 2015. Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts. Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts
335
357
.
Katie L. Maras, Sue Mulcahy, Amina Memon, Federica Picariello & Dermot M. Bowler. (2014)
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Self-Administered Interview
©
for Witnesses with Autism Spectrum Disorder
. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28:5, pages 693-701.
Crossref
Crossref