2,822
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Inconsistencies across repeated eyewitness interviews: supportive negative feedback can make witnesses change their memory reports

Pages 97-117 | Received 01 Feb 2016, Accepted 02 Aug 2016, Published online: 07 Sep 2016

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

Stefanie J. Sharman & Meaghan C. Danby. (2022) Suggestive questions reduce the accuracy of adults’ reports about one episode of a repeated event. Psychology, Crime & Law 0:0, pages 1-20.
Read now
Antonietta Curci, Tiziana Lanciano, Donatella Curtotti & Giuseppe Sartori. (2020) Lessons for the courtroom from the study of Flashbulb memory: an integrative review. Memory 28:3, pages 441-449.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (2)

Alan Scoboria & Linda Henkel. (2020) Defending or relinquishing belief in occurrence for remembered events that are challenged: A social‐cognitive model. Applied Cognitive Psychology 34:6, pages 1243-1252.
Crossref
Malwina Szpitalak & Romuald Polczyk. (2020) Reducing interrogative suggestibility: The role of self-affirmation and positive feedback. PLOS ONE 15:7, pages e0236088.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.