Advanced search
Publication Cover
Psychology, Crime & Law Volume 26, 2020 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
801
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The role of ulterior motives, inconsistencies, and details in unreliable jailhouse informant testimony

Danielle K. DeLoacha Psychology Department, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA
,
Jeffrey S. Neuschatza Psychology Department, The University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA
,
Stacy A. Wetmoreb Psychology Department, Roanoke College, Salem, VA, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5820-3340
ORCID Icon &
Brian H. Bornsteinc Department of Psychology, University Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Pages 667-686 | Received 11 Oct 2019, Accepted 07 Dec 2019, Published online: 03 Jan 2020

Citations (5)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (2)

Emily Shaw, Mona Lynch & Nicholas Scurich. (2023) Juror perceptions of incentivized informant testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law 0:0, pages 1-19.
Read now
Alexis M. Le Grand, Baylee D. Jenkins, Jonathan M. Golding, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Andrea M. Pals & Stacy A. Wetmore. (2021) The Sobering Effects of Jailhouse Informant Testimony on Perceptions of an Intoxicated Rape Victim. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 43:3, pages 195-212.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (3)

Baylee D. Jenkins, Alexis M. Le Grand, Stacy A. Wetmore, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Jonathan M. Golding & Anne Lippert. (2022) A Snitching Enterprise: the Role of Evidence and Incentives on Providing False Secondary Confessions. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology.
Crossref
Anna High. (2021) The exclusion of prison informant evidence for unreliability in New Zealand. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 25:3, pages 217-238.
Crossref
Baylee D. Jenkins, Alexis M. Le Grand, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Jonathan M. Golding, Stacy A. Wetmore & Jodi L. Price. (2021) Testing the Forensic Confirmation Bias: How Jailhouse Informants Violate Evidentiary Independence. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.