Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Volume 10, 2004 - Issue 2
Submit an article Journal homepage
205
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Speech Intelligibility of the Callsign Acquisition Test in a Quiet Environment

Misty BlueInstitute for Human-Machine Studies, Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, USA
,
Celestine A. NtuenInstitute for Human-Machine Studies, Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, USACorrespondence<[email protected]>
&
Tomasz LetowskiHuman Research & Engineering Directorate, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD, USA
Pages 179-189 | Published online: 08 Jan 2015

Citations (7)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (2)

Per Hiselius, Niklas Edvall & Daniel Reimers. (2015) To measure the impact of hearing protectors on the perception of speech in noise. International Journal of Audiology 54:sup1, pages S3-S8.
Read now
Misty Blue-Terry & Tomasz Letowski. (2011) Effects of white noise on Callsign Acquisition Test and Modified Rhyme Test scores. Ergonomics 54:2, pages 139-145.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (5)

Christopher J. Smalt, Paul T. Calamia, Andrew P. Dumas, Joseph P. Perricone, Tejash Patel, Johanna Bobrow, Paula P. Collins, Michelle L. MarkeyThomas F. Quatieri. (2020) The Effect of Hearing-Protection Devices on Auditory Situational Awareness and Listening Effort. Ear & Hearing 41:1, pages 82-94.
Crossref
Misty Blue-Terry, Maranda McBride & Tomasz Letowski. (2012) Effects of Speech Intensity on the Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT) and Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) Presented in Noise. Archives of Acoustics 37:2.
Crossref
M. Gripper, M. McBride, B. Osafo-Yeboah & X. Jiang. (2007) Using the Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT) to compare the speech intelligibility of air versus bone conduction. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 37:7, pages 631-641.
Crossref
B. Osafo-Yeboah, X. Jiang, M. Gripper & L. Lyons. (2016) Comparison of Speech Intelligibility Test between Air Conduction and Bone Conduction Using the Callsign Acquisition Test. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 50:4, pages 589-593.
Crossref
Mohan D. Rao & Tomasz Letowski. (2006) Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): Speech Intelligibility in Noise. Ear and Hearing 27:2, pages 120-128.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.