520
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Risk Perception/Communication Articles

How is Scientific Credibility Affected by Communicating Uncertainty? The Case of Endocrine Disrupter Effects on Male Fertility

&
Pages 201-223 | Received 19 May 2012, Published online: 11 Oct 2013

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Laura D. Scherer, Andrew Maynard, Dana C. Dolinoy, Angela Fagerlin & Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher. (2014) The psychology of ‘regrettable substitutions’: examining consumer judgements of Bisphenol A and its alternatives. Health, Risk & Society 16:7-8, pages 649-666.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (17)

Branden B. Johnson, Marcus Mayorga & Nathan F. Dieckmann. (2023) How people decide who is correct when groups of scientists disagree. Risk Analysis.
Crossref
Jianxun Chu, Yuqi Zhu & Jiaojiao Ji. (2023) Characterizing the semantic features of climate change misinformation on Chinese social media. Public Understanding of Science, pages 096366252311665.
Crossref
Inse Janssen, Friederike Hendriks & Regina Jucks. (2021) Face Masks Might Protect You From COVID-19: The Communication of Scientific Uncertainty by Scientists Versus Politicians in the Context of Policy in the Making. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 40:5-6, pages 602-626.
Crossref
Muhammad Naeem. (2020) The role of social media to generate social proof as engaged society for stockpiling behaviour of customers during Covid-19 pandemic. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 24:3, pages 281-301.
Crossref
Gabriel Recchia, Claudia R Schneider & Alexandra LJ Freeman. (2021) How do the UK public interpret COVID-19 test results? Comparing the impact of official information about results and reliability used in the UK, USA and New Zealand: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 11:5, pages e047731.
Crossref
Branden B. Johnson & Nathan F. Dieckmann. (2020) Lay beliefs about scientists’ relations with their employers. Public Understanding of Science 30:1, pages 103-114.
Crossref
Pascale Mansier. (2020) La place accordée aux informations scientifiques dans les magazines de santé télévisuels. Les Enjeux de l'information et de la communication N° 20/2:2, pages 43-54.
Crossref
Friederike Hendriks & Regina Jucks. (2020) Does Scientific Uncertainty in News Articles Affect Readers’ Trust and Decision-Making?. Media and Communication 8:2, pages 401-412.
Crossref
Branden B. Johnson & Nathan F. Dieckmann. (2019) Americans’ views of scientists’ motivations for scientific work. Public Understanding of Science 29:1, pages 2-20.
Crossref
Michelle L. Edwards. (2019) Uncertainty and trustworthiness in discussions of fracking: Exploring the views of academic scientists and local governmental representatives. The Extractive Industries and Society 6:4, pages 1113-1121.
Crossref
Branden B. Johnson. (2019) Experiments in Lay Cues to the Relative Validity of Positions Taken by Disputing Groups of Scientists. Risk Analysis 39:8, pages 1657-1674.
Crossref
Emma E.H. Doyle, David M. Johnston, Richard Smith & Douglas Paton. (2019) Communicating model uncertainty for natural hazards: A qualitative systematic thematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 33, pages 449-476.
Crossref
Andrew Hart, Laura Maxim, Michael Siegrist, Natalie Von Goetz, Cristina da Cruz, Caroline Merten, Olaf Mosbach‐Schulz, Majlinda Lahaniatis, Anthony Smith & Anthony Hardy. (2019) Guidance on Communication of Uncertainty in Scientific Assessments. EFSA Journal 17:1.
Crossref
Kazuya Nakayachi, Branden B. Johnson & Kazuki Koketsu. (2018) Effects of Acknowledging Uncertainty about Earthquake Risk Estimates on San Francisco Bay Area Residents’ Beliefs, Attitudes, and Intentions. Risk Analysis 38:4, pages 666-679.
Crossref
Matthias Gross. (2016) Risk as zombie category: Ulrich Beck’s unfinished project of the ‘non-knowledge’ society. Security Dialogue 47:5, pages 386-402.
Crossref
Lionel Scotto d’Apollonia. (2016) La dissonance communicationnelle des « porteurs de l’alerte » climatique. VertigO:Volume 16 numéro 2.
Crossref
Friederike Hendriks, Dorothe Kienhues & Rainer Bromme. (2016) Disclose your flaws! Admission positively affects the perceived trustworthiness of an expert science blogger. Studies in Communication Sciences 16:2, pages 124-131.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.