783
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Policy masquerading as science: an examination of non-state actor involvement in European risk assessment policy for genetically modified animals

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (2)

Marta Migliorati. (2020) Relying on agencies in major European Union legislative measures. West European Politics 43:1, pages 159-180.
Read now
André Sica de Campos, Sarah Hartley, Christiaan de Koning, Javier Lezaun & Lea Velho. (2017) Responsible Innovation and political accountability: genetically modified mosquitoes in Brazil. Journal of Responsible Innovation 4:1, pages 5-23.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (12)

Marit Svingen & Lisbeth Jahren. (2023) Making space for CRISPR: scientists’ translation work to make gene editing a legitimate technology. Science and Public Policy.
Crossref
Sigfrid Kjeldaas, Tim Dassler, Trine Antonsen, Odd-Gunnar Wikmark & Anne I. Myhr. (2022) With great power comes great responsibility: why ‘safe enough’ is not good enough in debates on new gene technologies. Agriculture and Human Values 40:2, pages 533-545.
Crossref
Sarah Hartley, Adam Kokotovich & Caroline McCalman. (2022) Prescribing engagement in environmental risk assessment for gene drive technology. Regulation & Governance 17:2, pages 411-424.
Crossref
Sarah Hartley, Adam Kokotovich, Yann Devos & John Mumford. (2023) Engagement on risk assessment for gene drive mosquitoes by EFSA and Target Malaria. Environmental Science & Policy 142, pages 183-193.
Crossref
Gustaf Nelhans & Jan Nolin. (2022) Anti-transparency within the EU shift to open science. Science and Public Policy 49:6, pages 928-941.
Crossref
Christian Freudlsperger, Adina Maricut-Akbik & Marta Migliorati. (2022) Opening Pandora’s Box? Joint Sovereignty and the Rise of EU Agencies with Operational Tasks. Comparative Political Studies 55:12, pages 1983-2014.
Crossref
Sigfrid Kjeldaas, Trine Antonsen, Sarah Hartley & Anne Ingeborg Myhr. (2021) Public Consultation on Proposed Revisions to Norway’s Gene Technology Act: An Analysis of the Consultation Framing, Stakeholder Concerns, and the Integration of Non-Safety Considerations. Sustainability 13:14, pages 7643.
Crossref
Giulia Bazzan & Marta Migliorati. (2020) Expertise, politics and public opinion at the crossroads of the European Commission’s decision-making: The case of Glyphosate.. International Review of Public Policy 2:1.
Crossref
Richard Helliwell, Sarah Hartley & Warren Pearce. (2019) NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing. Agriculture and Human Values 36:4, pages 779-791.
Crossref
Kathryn Oliver & Annette Boaz. (2019) Transforming evidence for policy and practice: creating space for new conversations. Palgrave Communications 5:1.
Crossref
Nienke de Graeff, Karin R. Jongsma, Josephine Johnston, Sarah Hartley & Annelien L. Bredenoord. (2019) The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 374:1772.
Crossref
Sarah Hartley, Frøydis Gillund, Lilian van Hove & Fern Wickson. (2016) Essential Features of Responsible Governance of Agricultural Biotechnology. PLOS Biology 14:5, pages e1002453.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.