Citations (12)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (5)
Zeynel Abidin Ozdemir & Emre Aksoy. (2015) Are real exchanges rate series really persistent?: evidence from three commonwealth of independent states countries. Applied Economics 47:40, pages 4299-4309.
Read now
Read now
S. H. Hung & M. J. Weng. (2011) Panel unit root tests of purchasing power parity for Central Asian countries. Applied Economics Letters 18:6, pages 585-590.
Read now
Read now
Venus Khim-Sen Liew, Ricky Chee-Jiun Chia & Tai-Hu Ling. (2010) Long-run validity of purchasing power parity and rank tests for cointegration for Central Asian countries. Applied Economics Letters 17:11, pages 1073-1077.
Read now
Read now
Erdinc Telatar & Mübariz Hasanov. (2009) Purchasing Power Parity in transition economies: evidence from the Commonwealth of Independent States. Post-Communist Economies 21:2, pages 157-173.
Read now
Read now
Laurence Copeland & Saeed Heravi. (2009) Structural breaks in the real exchange rate adjustment mechanism. Applied Financial Economics 19:2, pages 121-134.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (7)
Ferhat KARADEMİR & Samet EVCİ. (2022) MIST Ülkelerinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi Geçerli mi?Is Purchasing Power Parity Valid in MIST Countries?. İktisadi İdari ve Siyasal Araştırmalar Dergisi 7:19, pages 421-433.
Crossref
Crossref
Mehmet ERDOĞMUŞ. (2021) An Analysis of The Validity of Absolute Purchasing Power Parity: The Case of Turkish Lira and British PoundMutlak Satın Alma Gücü Paritesinin Geçerliliğine İlişkin Bir Analiz: Türk Lirası ve İngiliz Sterlini Örneği. Sosyoekonomi 29:50, pages 51-71.
Crossref
Crossref
Havanur ERGÜN TATAR. (2021) Seçilmiş Entegrasyon Örgütlerinde Satın Alma Gücü Paritesi Teorisinin Geçerliliğinin Fourier Fonksiyonu Kullanarak Fraksiyonel Birim Kökleriyle Test EdilmesiTesting the Validity of The Purchasing Power Parity Theory in Selected Integration Organizations by Using the Fourier Function with Fractional Unit Roots. Sosyoekonomi 29:49, pages 373-388.
Crossref
Crossref
Oktay KIZILKAYA & Faruk MİKE. (2021) Satınalma Gücü Paritesinin OECD Ülkeleri için Test Edilmesi: Fourier Kantil Birim Kök Testinden BulgularTesting the Purchasing Power Parity for the OECD Countries: Evidence from Fourier Quantile Unit Root Test. İzmir İktisat Dergisi 36:1, pages 97-107.
Crossref
Crossref
Mehmet SONGUR. (2019) YAPISAL KIRILMALAR ALTINDA SATIN ALMA GÜCÜ PARİTESİ HİPOTEZİNİN GEÇERLİLİĞİ: AVRASYA ÜLKELERİ ÖRNEĞİTHE VALIDITY OF THE PURCHASING POWER PARITY HYPOTHESIS UNDER STRUCTURAL BREAKS: THE CASE OF EURASIAN COUNTRIES. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9:17, pages 567-586.
Crossref
Crossref
Cuong K. Q. Tran, An H. Pham & Loan K. T. Vo. 2019. Beyond Traditional Probabilistic Methods in Economics. Beyond Traditional Probabilistic Methods in Economics
402
416
.
Kadir Karagöz & T. Bahadır Saraç. (2016) Testing the Validity of PPP Theory for Turkey: Nonlinear Unit Root Testing. Procedia Economics and Finance 38, pages 458-467.
Crossref
Crossref