Advanced search
Publication Cover
Applied Economics Letters Volume 14, 2007 - Issue 10
Submit an article Journal homepage
130
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Investigating hypothetical bias: induced-value tests of the referendum voting mechanism with uncertainty

Pallab Mozumder The Environmental Institute, University of Massachusetts, Amhest, MA 01003, USACorrespondence[email protected]
&
Robert P. Berrens Department of Economics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
Pages 705-709 | Published online: 24 Aug 2007

Citations (16)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (3)

Ewa Zawojska & Mikołaj Czajkowski. (2017) Re-examining empirical evidence on stated preferences: importance of incentive compatibility. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6:4, pages 374-403.
Read now
Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu, Pere Riera & Marek Giergiczny. (2012) The influence of cheap talk on willingness-to-pay ranges: some empirical evidence from a contingent valuation study. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 55:6, pages 753-763.
Read now
Pallab Mozumder & Robert P. Berrens. (2011) Social context, financial stakes and hypothetical bias: an induced value referendum experiment. Applied Economics 43:29, pages 4487-4499.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (13)

Milad Haghani, Michiel C.J. Bliemer, John M. Rose, Harmen Oppewal & Emily Lancsar. (2021) Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging. Journal of Choice Modelling 41, pages 100309.
Crossref
Iván Pérez-Rubio, Daniel Flores, Christian Vargas, Francisco Jiménez & Iker Etxano. (2021) To What Extent Are Cattle Ranching Landholders Willing to Restore Ecosystem Services? Constructing a Micro-Scale PES Scheme in Southern Costa Rica. Land 10:7, pages 709.
Crossref
Adelina Gschwandtner & Michael Burton. (2020) Comparing treatments to reduce hypothetical bias in choice experiments regarding organic food. European Review of Agricultural Economics 47:3, pages 1302-1337.
Crossref
Lucy Kanya, Sabina Sanghera, Alex Lewin & Julia Fox-Rushby. (2019) The criterion validity of willingness to pay methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence. Social Science & Medicine 232, pages 238-261.
Crossref
Jerrod M Penn & Wuyang Hu. (2018) Understanding Hypothetical Bias: An Enhanced Meta‐Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 100:4, pages 1186-1206.
Crossref
Tenaw G. Abate, Morten R. Mørkbak & Søren B. Olsen. (2018) Inducing value and institutional learning effects in stated choice experiments using advanced disclosure and instructional choice set treatments. Agricultural Economics 49:3, pages 339-351.
Crossref
Nicolas Jacquemet, Alexander James, Stéphane Luchini & Jason F. Shogren. (2016) Referenda Under Oath. Environmental and Resource Economics 67:3, pages 479-504.
Crossref
Pallab MozumderArindam Gan ChowdhuryWilliam F. VásquezEvan Flugman. (2015) Household Preferences for a Hurricane Mitigation Fund in Florida. Natural Hazards Review 16:3.
Crossref
Richard T. Yao, Riccardo Scarpa, James A. Turner, Tim D. Barnard, John M. Rose, João H.N. Palma & Duncan R. Harrison. (2014) Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay. Ecological Economics 98, pages 90-101.
Crossref
Hermann Pythagore Pierre Donfouet, Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu & Eric Malin. (2011) Using respondents’ uncertainty scores to mitigate hypothetical bias in community-based health insurance studies. The European Journal of Health Economics 14:2, pages 277-285.
Crossref
Nicolas Jacquemet, Alexander G. James, Stéphane Luchini & Jason F. Shogren. (2011) Social Psychology and Environmental Economics: A New Look at ex ante Corrections of Biased Preference Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics 48:3, pages 413-433.
Crossref
Laura O. Taylor, Mark D. Morrison & Kevin J. Boyle. (2010) Exchange Rules and the Incentive Compatibility of Choice Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics 47:2, pages 197-220.
Crossref
Mimako Kobayashi, Kimberly Rollins & M. D. R. Evans. (2016) Sensitivity of WTP Estimates to Definition of ‘Yes’: Reinterpreting Expressed Response Intensity. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39:1, pages 37-55.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.