Citations (85)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (9)
Sohel Ahmed & Ding Hooi Ting. (2023) Visual Search from the perspective of in-store exploration behavior: scale development and validation. Journal of Strategic Marketing 31:5, pages 1029-1052.
Read now
Read now
Steven J. Luck, Nicholas Gaspelin, Charles L. Folk, Roger W. Remington & Jan Theeuwes. (2021) Progress toward resolving the attentional capture debate. Visual Cognition 29:1, pages 1-21.
Read now
Read now
Stefanie I. Becker, Aimee Martin & Zachary Hamblin-Frohman. (2019) Target templates in singleton search vs. feature-based search modes. Visual Cognition 27:5-8, pages 502-517.
Read now
Read now
Nancy B. Carlisle & Aleksander W. Nitka. (2019) Location-based explanations do not account for active attentional suppression. Visual Cognition 27:3-4, pages 305-316.
Read now
Read now
Adam T. Biggs, Ryan D. Kreager & Christopher C. Davoli. (2015) Finding a link between guided search and perceptual load theory. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 27:2, pages 164-179.
Read now
Read now
Mei-Ching Lien, Eric Ruthruff & Jamie Naylor. (2014) Attention capture while switching search strategies: Evidence for a breakdown in top-down attentional control. Visual Cognition 22:8, pages 1105-1133.
Read now
Read now
ChristianN. L. Olivers & Martijn Meeter. (2012) Current versus past ambiguity in intertrial priming. Visual Cognition 20:6, pages 627-646.
Read now
Read now
Katherine
Sledge Moore & DanielH. Weissman. (2011) Set-specific capture can be reduced by pre-emptively occupying a limited-capacity focus of attention. Visual Cognition 19:4, pages 417-444.
Read now
Read now
BradleyS. Gibson, CharlesL. Folk, Jan Theeuwes & Alan Kingstone. (2008) Introduction. Visual Cognition 16:2-3, pages 145-154.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (76)
Nataša Mihajlović & Sunčica Zdravković. (2023) Contingent capture by color is sensitive to categorical color perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
Crossref
Crossref
Yuangao Chen, Xinjia Tong, Shuiqing Yang & Shasha Zhou. (2023) Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on customer behavior in live streaming: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Industrial Management & Data Systems 123:9, pages 2397-2422.
Crossref
Crossref
Jiwen Chen, Bihua Cao & Fuhong Li. (2023) Do after “not to do”: Deinhibition in cognitive control. Memory & Cognition 51:6, pages 1388-1403.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie I. Becker, Anna Grubert, Gernot Horstmann & Ulrich Ansorge. (2023) Which processes dominate visual search: Bottom-up feature contrast, top-down tuning or trial history?. Cognition 236, pages 105420.
Crossref
Crossref
Taylor J. Rigsby, Brad T. Stilwell, Eric Ruthruff & Nicholas Gaspelin. (2023) A new technique for estimating the probability of attentional capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 85:2, pages 543-559.
Crossref
Crossref
Antonino Esposito, Salvatore Gaetano Chiarella, Antonino Raffone, Andrey R. Nikolaev & Cees van Leeuwen. (2023) Perceptual bias contextualized in visually ambiguous stimuli. Cognition 230, pages 105284.
Crossref
Crossref
Dirk Kerzel & Anna Grubert. (2021) Capacity limitations in template-guided multiple color search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29:3, pages 901-909.
Crossref
Crossref
Qianwen Xu, Jie Lv & Cong Cao. (2022) The Influence Mechanism of Presence on Viewers' Intention in the Context of Live Streaming based on the Interface Design Perspective. The Influence Mechanism of Presence on Viewers' Intention in the Context of Live Streaming based on the Interface Design Perspective.
Aniruddha Ramgir & Dominique Lamy. (2021) Does feature intertrial priming guide attention? The jury is still out. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29:2, pages 369-393.
Crossref
Crossref
Janina Balke, Bettina Rolke & Verena C. Seibold. (2022) Temporal preparation accelerates spatial selection by facilitating bottom-up processing. Brain Research 1777, pages 147765.
Crossref
Crossref
Brian A. Anderson, Haena Kim, Andy J. Kim, Ming-Ray Liao, Lana Mrkonja, Andrew Clement & Laurent Grégoire. (2021) The past, present, and future of selection history. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 130, pages 326-350.
Crossref
Crossref
Koeun Jung, Suk Won Han & Yoonki Min. (2021) Sharper attentional tuning with target templates in long-term compared to working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:4, pages 1261-1269.
Crossref
Crossref
Edyta Sasin & Daryl Fougnie. (2021) The road to long-term memory: Top-down attention is more effective than bottom-up attention for forming long-term memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:3, pages 937-945.
Crossref
Crossref
Mengqi Fei, Huizhong Tan, Xixian Peng, Qiuzhen Wang & Lei Wang. (2021) Promoting or attenuating? An eye-tracking study on the role of social cues in e-commerce livestreaming. Decision Support Systems 142, pages 113466.
Crossref
Crossref
Janina Balke, Bettina Rolke & Verena C. Seibold. (2021) Reduction of temporal uncertainty facilitates stimulus-driven processes in spatial selection. Biological Psychology 159, pages 108028.
Crossref
Crossref
Rongqi Lin, Xinyu Li, Benchi Wang & Jan Theeuwes. (2020) Spatial suppression due to statistical learning tracks the estimated spatial probability. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 83:1, pages 283-291.
Crossref
Crossref
Anthony M. Harris, Oscar Jacoby, Roger W. Remington, Stefanie I. Becker & Jason B. Mattingley. (2020) Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for a dissociation between working memory capacity and feature-based attention. Cortex 129, pages 158-174.
Crossref
Crossref
Eyal Alef Ophir, Eyal Sherman & Dominique Lamy. (2018) An attentional blink in the absence of spatial attention: a cost of awareness?. Psychological Research 84:4, pages 1039-1055.
Crossref
Crossref
Bryan R. Burnham. (2019) Evidence for early top-down modulation of attention to salient visual cues through probe detection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 82:3, pages 1003-1023.
Crossref
Crossref
Christian Büsel, Martin Voracek & Ulrich Ansorge. (2018) A meta-analysis of contingent-capture effects. Psychological Research 84:3, pages 784-809.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie I. Becker, Marina Atalla & Charles L. Folk. (2019) Conjunction search: Can we simultaneously bias attention to features and relations?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 82:1, pages 246-268.
Crossref
Crossref
Ulrich Ansorge, Davood G. Gozli & Florian Goller. (2017) Investigating the contribution of task and response repetitions to the sequential modulations of attentional cueing effects. Psychological Research 83:6, pages 1251-1268.
Crossref
Crossref
Tobias Schoeberl, Florian Goller & Ulrich Ansorge. (2019) Testing a priming account of the contingent-capture effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 81:5, pages 1262-1282.
Crossref
Crossref
Susan L. Travis, Paul E. Dux & Jason B. Mattingley. (2018) Neural correlates of goal-directed enhancement and suppression of visual stimuli in the absence of conscious perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 81:5, pages 1346-1364.
Crossref
Crossref
Christian Büsel, Ulrich Pomper & Ulrich Ansorge. (2018) Capture of attention by target-similar cues during dual-color search reflects reactive control among top-down selected attentional control settings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:2, pages 531-537.
Crossref
Crossref
Tobias Schoeberl, Florian Goller & Ulrich Ansorge. (2018) Top-down matching singleton cues have no edge over top-down matching nonsingletons in spatial cueing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:1, pages 241-249.
Crossref
Crossref
Andrey Chetverikov, Sabrina Hansmann-Roth, Ömer Dağlar Tanrıkulu & Árni Kristjánsson. 2020. Spatial Learning and Attention Guidance. Spatial Learning and Attention Guidance
37
57
.
Greg Huffman, Victoria M. Antinucci & Jay Pratt. (2018) The illusion of control: Sequential dependencies underlie contingent attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25:6, pages 2238-2244.
Crossref
Crossref
Alon Zivony & Dominique Lamy. (2018) Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences. Psychological Science 29:12, pages 1930-1941.
Crossref
Crossref
Mario Carlo Severo, Wioleta Walentowska, Agnes Moors & Gilles Pourtois. (2018) Goals matter: Amplification of the motivational significance of the feedback when goal impact is increased. Brain and Cognition 128, pages 56-72.
Crossref
Crossref
Hanna Weichselbaum, Christoph Huber-Huber & Ulrich Ansorge. (2018) Attention capture is temporally stable: Evidence from mixed-model correlations. Cognition 180, pages 206-224.
Crossref
Crossref
Hui-Yuan WANG, Jie SUI & Ming ZHANG. (2022) 语义关联的注意捕获——来自线索化范式的证据. Acta Psychologica Sinica 50:10, pages 1071-1082.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie I. Becker. (2018) Reply to Theeuwes: Fast Feature-based Top-down Effects, but Saliency May be Slow. Journal of Cognition 1:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Katherine Sledge Moore & Elizabeth A. Wiemers. (2017) Practice reduces set-specific capture costs only superficially. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 80:3, pages 643-661.
Crossref
Crossref
Guy Bosmans, Emma Goldblum, Caroline Braet, Magali van de Walle, Joke Heylen, Patricia Bijttebier, Tara Santens, Ernst H. W. Koster & Rudi De Raedt. (2018) Children's attentional breadth around their mother: Comparing stimulus-driven vs. cognitively controlled processes. Social Development 27:1, pages 95-108.
Crossref
Crossref
Teresa Cosentino, Enrico Iuliano, Angelo Saliani, Claudia Perdighe & Francesco Mancini. (2017) Bias attentivo verso gli stimoli inerenti la colpa nel disturbo ossessivo-compulsivo: un'indagine preliminare. QUADERNI DI PSICOTERAPIA COGNITIVA:41, pages 5-17.
Crossref
Crossref
Michel Failing & Jan Theeuwes. (2017) Don’t let it distract you: how information about the availability of reward affects attentional selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 79:8, pages 2275-2298.
Crossref
Crossref
Adam T. Biggs, Kait Clark & Stephen R. Mitroff. (2017) Who should be searching? Differences in personality can affect visual search accuracy. Personality and Individual Differences 116, pages 353-358.
Crossref
Crossref
Jean-Baptiste Légal, Peggy Chekroun, Viviane Coiffard & Fabrice Gabarrot. (2017) Beware of the gorilla: Effect of goal priming on inattentional blindness. Consciousness and Cognition 55, pages 165-171.
Crossref
Crossref
Josef G. Schönhammer & Dirk Kerzel. (2016) Detection costs and contingent attentional capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 79:2, pages 429-437.
Crossref
Crossref
Wouter Durnez & Stefaan Van Damme. (2015) Let it be? Pain control attempts critically amplify attention to somatosensory input. Psychological Research 81:1, pages 309-320.
Crossref
Crossref
Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld & Anna Schubö. (2016) Intertrial priming due to distractor repetition is eliminated in homogeneous contexts. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 78:7, pages 1935-1947.
Crossref
Crossref
Wioleta Walentowska, Agnes Moors, Katharina Paul & Gilles Pourtois. (2016) Goal relevance influences performance monitoring at the level of the FRN and P3 components. Psychophysiology 53:7, pages 1020-1033.
Crossref
Crossref
Mark W. Becker, Susan M. Ravizza & Chad Peltier. (2015) An inability to set independent attentional control settings by hemifield. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77:8, pages 2640-2652.
Crossref
Crossref
Anthony M. Harris, Stefanie I. Becker & Roger W. Remington. (2015) Capture by colour: Evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77:7, pages 2305-2321.
Crossref
Crossref
Florian Goller & Ulrich Ansorge. (2015) There is more to trial history than priming in attentional capture experiments. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77:5, pages 1574-1584.
Crossref
Crossref
Mary H. MacLean & Barry Giesbrecht. (2015) Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77:5, pages 1515-1528.
Crossref
Crossref
Wouter Durnez & Stefaan Van Damme. (2015) Trying to Fix a Painful Problem: The Impact of Pain Control Attempts on the Attentional Prioritization of a Threatened Body Location. The Journal of Pain 16:2, pages 135-143.
Crossref
Crossref
Tetsuko KASAI & Jun-ichiro KAWAHARA. (2015) Selective attention. Japanese Journal of Physiological Psychology and Psychophysiology 33:1, pages 1-3.
Crossref
Crossref
Dominique Lamy, Limor Alon, Tomer Carmel & Nir Shalev. (2014) The Role of Conscious Perception in Attentional Capture and Object-File Updating. Psychological Science 26:1, pages 48-57.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert Dowman. (2013) Neural mechanisms underlying pain’s ability to reorient attention: Evidence for sensitization of somatic threat detectors. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 14:2, pages 805-817.
Crossref
Crossref
Feng Du, Kan Zhang & Richard A. Abrams. (2014) Hold the future, let the past go: Attention prefers the features of future targets. Cognition 131:2, pages 205-215.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie I. Becker, Christian Valuch & Ulrich Ansorge. (2014) Color priming in pop-out search depends on the relative color of the target. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Crossref
Crossref
Ulrich Ansorge & Stefanie I. Becker. (2013) Contingent capture in cueing: the role of color search templates and cue-target color relations. Psychological Research 78:2, pages 209-221.
Crossref
Crossref
Katherine Sledge Moore & Daniel H. Weissman. (2014) A Bottleneck Model of Set-Specific Capture. PLoS ONE 9:2, pages e88313.
Crossref
Crossref
Hsin-I Liao & Su-Ling Yeh. (2013) Capturing attention is not that simple: Different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75:8, pages 1703-1714.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie I. Becker. (2013) Simply shapely: Relative, not absolute shapes are primed in pop-out search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75:5, pages 845-861.
Crossref
Crossref
Fook K. Chua. (2013) Tuning characteristics of the top-down attentional setting. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75:3, pages 440-455.
Crossref
Crossref
Bryan R. Burnham. (2012) Using response time distributions to examine top-down influences on attentional capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75:2, pages 257-277.
Crossref
Crossref
Brian A. Anderson & Charles L. Folk. (2012) Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 74:6, pages 1183-1198.
Crossref
Crossref
Ulrich Ansorge & Stefanie I. Becker. (2011) Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 74:1, pages 83-104.
Crossref
Crossref
Hsin-I Liao & Su-Ling Yeh. (2011) Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture. Acta Psychologica 138:1, pages 52-59.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael Zehetleitner, Joseph Krummenacher, Thomas Geyer, Michael Hegenloh & Hermann J. Müller. (2010) Dimension intertrial and cueing effects in localization: support for pre-attentively weighted one-route models of saliency. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73:2, pages 349-363.
Crossref
Crossref
Joshua D. Cosman & Shaun P. Vecera. (2010) Attentional capture under high perceptual load. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17:6, pages 815-820.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie I. Becker. (2010) Oculomotor capture by colour singletons depends on intertrial priming. Vision Research 50:21, pages 2116-2126.
Crossref
Crossref
Katherine Sledge Moore & Daniel H. Weissman. (2010) Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: Evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72:6, pages 1495-1509.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel LeBlanc, Alain Forget & Robert Biddle. (2010) Guessing click-based graphical passwords by eye tracking. Guessing click-based graphical passwords by eye tracking.
Charles L. Folk & Brian A. Anderson. (2010) Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17:3, pages 421-426.
Crossref
Crossref
Martin Eimer & Monika Kiss. (2010) Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72:4, pages 951-962.
Crossref
Crossref
Julia Vogt, Jan De Houwer, Agnes Moors, Stefaan Van Damme & Geert Crombez. (2010) The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli. Acta Psychologica 134:1, pages 61-69.
Crossref
Crossref
Brian A. Anderson & Charles L. Folk. (2010) Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72:2, pages 342-352.
Crossref
Crossref
Artem V. Belopolsky, Daniel Schreij & Jan Theeuwes. (2010) What is top-down about contingent capture?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72:2, pages 326-341.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefaan Van Damme, Valéry Legrain, Julia Vogt & Geert Crombez. (2010) Keeping pain in mind: A motivational account of attention to pain. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 34:2, pages 204-213.
Crossref
Crossref
Anna Schubö & Hermann J. Müller. (2009) Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search. Brain Research 1283, pages 84-101.
Crossref
Crossref
Hyunkyu Lee, Michael C. Mozer & Shaun P. Vecera. (2009) Mechanisms of priming of pop-out: Stored representations or feature-gain modulations?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71:5, pages 1059-1071.
Crossref
Crossref
Stefanie I. Becker, Ulrich Ansorge & Gernot Horstmann. (2009) Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?. Vision Research 49:14, pages 1738-1756.
Crossref
Crossref