Advanced search
Publication Cover
Visual Cognition Volume 20, 2012 - Issue 4-5: Computational Approaches to Reading and Scene Perception
Submit an article Journal homepage
3,047
Views
65
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model

Daniel J. Schad Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, GermanyCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Ralf Engbert Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Pages 391-421 | Received 07 Jul 2011, Accepted 09 Feb 2012, Published online: 23 May 2012

Citations (65)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (14)

Evagoras Evagorou, Christodoulos Mettas, Athos Agapiou, Kyriacos Themistocleous, Spyridon Papavasileiou & Diofantos Hadjimitsis. (2021) Digital camera calibration for cultural heritage documentation: the case study of a mass digitization project of religious monuments in Cyprus. European Journal of Remote Sensing 54:sup1, pages 6-17.
Read now
Aline Frey & Marie-Line Bosse. (2018) Perceptual span, visual span, and visual attention span: Three potential ways to quantify limits on visual processing during reading. Visual Cognition 26:6, pages 412-429.
Read now
Jinger Pan, Ming Yan & Jochen Laubrock. (2017) Perceptual Span in Oral Reading: The Case of Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading 21:3, pages 254-263.
Read now
Lili Yu, Michael G. Cutter, Guoli Yan, Xuejun Bai, Yu Fu, Denis Drieghe & Simon P. Liversedge. (2016) Word n + 2 preview effects in three-character Chinese idioms and phrases. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31:9, pages 1130-1149.
Read now
Aaron Veldre & Sally Andrews. (2014) Lexical quality and eye movements: Individual differences in the perceptual span of skilled adult readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67:4, pages 703-727.
Read now
Daniel J. Schad, Sarah Risse, Timothy Slattery & Keith Rayner. (2014) Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye movements during reading. Visual Cognition 22:3-4, pages 390-414.
Read now
Sarah Risse, Sven Hohenstein, Reinhold Kliegl & Ralf Engbert. (2014) A theoretical analysis of the perceptual span based on SWIFT simulations of the n + 2 boundary paradigm. Visual Cognition 22:3-4, pages 283-308.
Read now
Elizabeth R. Schotter, Erik D. Reichle & Keith Rayner. (2014) Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects. Visual Cognition 22:3-4, pages 309-333.
Read now
Antje Nuthmann. (2013) On the visual span during object search in real-world scenes. Visual Cognition 21:7, pages 803-837.
Read now
Keith Rayner, Bernhard Angele, ElizabethR. Schotter & Klinton Bicknell. (2013) On the processing of canonical word order during eye fixations in reading: Do readers process transposed word previews?. Visual Cognition 21:3, pages 353-381.
Read now
Antje Nuthmann & JohnM. Henderson. (2012) Using CRISP to model global characteristics of fixation durations in scene viewing and reading with a common mechanism. Visual Cognition 20:4-5, pages 457-494.
Read now
Klinton Bicknell & Roger Levy. (2012) The utility of modelling word identification from visual input within models of eye movements in reading. Visual Cognition 20:4-5, pages 422-456.
Read now
Sophie Marat & Laurent Itti. (2012) Influence of the amount of context learned for improving object classification when simultaneously learning object and contextual cues. Visual Cognition 20:4-5, pages 580-602.
Read now
GregoryJ. Zelinsky. (2012) TAM: Explaining off-object fixations and central fixation tendencies as effects of population averaging during search. Visual Cognition 20:4-5, pages 515-545.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (51)

Kristina Krasich, Kevin O'Neill, Samuel Murray, James R. Brockmole, Felipe De Brigard & Antje Nuthmann. (2024) A computational modeling approach to investigating mind wandering-related adjustments to gaze behavior during scene viewing. Cognition 242, pages 105624.
Crossref
Jinger Pan & Ming Yan. (2023) The perceptual span in traditional Chinese. Language and Cognition, pages 1-14.
Crossref
Chuanli Zang, Zhichao Zhang, Manman Zhang, Federica Degno & Simon P. Liversedge. (2023) Examining semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects using a Stroop boundary paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language 128, pages 104387.
Crossref
M. Antúnez, P.J. López-Pérez, J. Dampuré & H.A. Barber. (2022) Frequency-based foveal load modulates semantic parafoveal-on-foveal effects. Journal of Neurolinguistics 63, pages 101071.
Crossref
Simon P. Liversedge, Chuanli Zang & Feifei Liang. 2022. The Science of Reading. The Science of Reading 261 279 .
Xingshan Li, Linjieqiong Huang, Panpan Yao & Jukka Hyönä. (2022) Universal and specific reading mechanisms across different writing systems. Nature Reviews Psychology 1:3, pages 133-144.
Crossref
R. Calen Walshe & Antje Nuthmann. (2021) A Computational Dual-Process Model of Fixation-Duration Control in Natural Scene Viewing. Computational Brain & Behavior 4:4, pages 463-484.
Crossref
Jinger Pan, Ming Yan, Eike M. Richter, Hua Shu & Reinhold Kliegl. (2021) The Beijing Sentence Corpus: A Chinese sentence corpus with eye movement data and predictability norms. Behavior Research Methods 54:4, pages 1989-2000.
Crossref
Nobuhiko Wagatsuma, Brian Hu, Rüdiger von der Heydt & Ernst Niebur. (2021) Analysis of spiking synchrony in visual cortex reveals distinct types of top-down modulation signals for spatial and object-based attention. PLOS Computational Biology 17:3, pages e1008829.
Crossref
Jukka Hyönä, Timo T. Heikkilä, Seppo Vainio & Reinhold Kliegl. (2021) Parafoveal access to word stem during reading: An eye movement study. Cognition 208, pages 104547.
Crossref
Ralf EngbertRalf Engbert. 2021. Dynamical Models In Neurocognitive Psychology. Dynamical Models In Neurocognitive Psychology 67 88 .
Manman ZHANG, Chuanli ZANG & Xuejun BAI. (2022) The spatial extent and depth of parafoveal pre-processing during Chinese reading. Advances in Psychological Science 28:6, pages 871-882.
Crossref
Wolfgang Einhäuser, Charlotte Atzert & Antje Nuthmann. (2020) Fixation durations in natural scene viewing are guided by peripheral scene content. Journal of Vision 20:4, pages 15.
Crossref
Johan Chandra, André Krügel & Ralf Engbert. (2019) Experimental test of Bayesian saccade targeting under reversed reading direction. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 82:3, pages 1230-1240.
Crossref
Stefan A. Seelig, Maximilian M. Rabe, Noa Malem-Shinitski, Sarah Risse, Sebastian Reich & Ralf Engbert. (2020) Bayesian parameter estimation for the SWIFT model of eye-movement control during reading. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 95, pages 102313.
Crossref
Johan Chandra, André Krügel & Ralf Engbert. (2020) Modulation of oculomotor control during reading of mirrored and inverted texts. Scientific Reports 10:1.
Crossref
Federica Degno & Simon P. Liversedge. (2020) Eye Movements and Fixation-Related Potentials in Reading: A Review. Vision 4:1, pages 11.
Crossref
Mohsin Ashraf, Guohua Geng, Xiaofeng Wang, Farooq Ahmad & Fazeel Abid. (2020) A Globally Regularized Joint Neural Architecture for Music Classification. IEEE Access 8, pages 220980-220989.
Crossref
Timothy J. Slattery & Adam J. Parker. (2019) Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 26:6, pages 1948-1957.
Crossref
Elizabeth R. Schotter & Brennan R. Payne. (2019) Eye Movements and Comprehension Are Important to Reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23:10, pages 811-812.
Crossref
Chuanli Zang. (2019) New Perspectives on Serialism and Parallelism in Oculomotor Control During Reading: The Multi-Constituent Unit Hypothesis. Vision 3:4, pages 50.
Crossref
Sarah Risse & Stefan Seelig. (2019) Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:7, pages 1632-1645.
Crossref
Anna K. Laurinavichyute, Irina A. Sekerina, Svetlana Alexeeva, Kristine Bagdasaryan & Reinhold Kliegl. (2018) Russian Sentence Corpus: Benchmark measures of eye movements in reading in Russian. Behavior Research Methods 51:3, pages 1161-1178.
Crossref
Yanping Liu & Erik D. Reichle. (2018) Using eye movements to understand the leakage of information during Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25:6, pages 2323-2329.
Crossref
Aaron Veldre & Sally Andrews. (2018) How does foveal processing difficulty affect parafoveal processing during reading?. Journal of Memory and Language 103, pages 74-90.
Crossref
Yongsheng WANG, Bingjie ZHAO, Mingjing CHEN, Xin; LI, Guoli YAN & Xuejun BAI. (2022) 中央凹加工负荷与副中央凹信息在汉语阅读眼跳目标选择中的作用. Acta Psychologica Sinica 50:12, pages 1336-1345.
Crossref
Yanping Liu & Erik D. Reichle. (2017) Eye-Movement Evidence for Object-Based Attention in Chinese Reading. Psychological Science 29:2, pages 278-287.
Crossref
Chuanli Zang, Manman Zhang, Xuejun Bai, Guoli Yan, Bernhard Angele & Simon P Liversedge. (2018) Skipping of the very-high-frequency structural particle d e (的) in Chinese reading . Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:1, pages 152-160.
Crossref
Lili Yu, Qiaoming Zhang, Caspian Priest, Erik D Reichle & Heather Sheridan. (2018) Character-complexity effects in Chinese reading and visual search: A comparison and theoretical implications. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:1, pages 140-151.
Crossref
Elizabeth R. Schotter. 2018. Current Topics in Language. Current Topics in Language 263 298 .
Noor Al-Zanoon, Michael Dambacher & Victor Kuperman. (2016) Evidence for a global oculomotor program in reading. Psychological Research 81:4, pages 863-877.
Crossref
Sven Hohenstein, Hannes Matuschek & Reinhold Kliegl. (2016) Linked linear mixed models: A joint analysis of fixation locations and fixation durations in natural reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24:3, pages 637-651.
Crossref
Benthe Kornrumpf, Olaf Dimigen & Werner Sommer. (2017) Lateralization of posterior alpha EEG reflects the distribution of spatial attention during saccadic reading. Psychophysiology 54:6, pages 809-823.
Crossref
Antje Nuthmann. (2016) Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24:2, pages 370-392.
Crossref
Jochen Laubrock, Ralf Engbert & Anke Cajar. (2017) Gaze-contingent manipulation of the FVF demonstrates the importance of fixation duration for explaining search behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
Crossref
Rachid Khelifi, Laurent Sparrow & Séverine Casalis. (2017) Are the final letters of a parafoveal word used by developing readers? Evidence from a single word reading task. Cognitive Development 41, pages 65-72.
Crossref
Florian Niefind & Olaf Dimigen. (2016) Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study. Psychophysiology 53:12, pages 1784-1798.
Crossref
Benthe Kornrumpf, Florian Niefind, Werner Sommer & Olaf Dimigen. (2016) Neural Correlates of Word Recognition: A Systematic Comparison of Natural Reading and Rapid Serial Visual Presentation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 28:9, pages 1374-1391.
Crossref
Anja Sperlich, Johannes Meixner & Jochen Laubrock. (2016) Development of the perceptual span in reading: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 146, pages 181-201.
Crossref
Heather Sheridan & Erik D. Reichle. (2016) An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading. Cognitive Science 40:3, pages 522-553.
Crossref
Matthew J. Abbott & Adrian Staub. (2015) The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading: Testing E-Z Reader’s null predictions. Journal of Memory and Language 85, pages 76-87.
Crossref
Benthe Kornrumpf & Werner Sommer. (2015) Modulation of the attentional span by foveal and parafoveal task load: An ERP study using attentional probes. Psychophysiology 52:9, pages 1218-1227.
Crossref
Titus von der Malsburg, Reinhold Kliegl & Shravan Vasishth. (2015) Determinants of Scanpath Regularity in Reading. Cognitive Science 39:7, pages 1675-1703.
Crossref
Bernhard Angele, Elizabeth R. Schotter, Timothy J. Slattery, Tara L. Tenenbaum, Klinton Bicknell & Keith Rayner. (2015) Do successor effects in reading reflect lexical parafoveal processing? Evidence from corpus-based and experimental eye movement data. Journal of Memory and Language 79-80, pages 76-96.
Crossref
Aiping Wang, Wei Zhou, Hua Shu & Ming Yan. (2014) Reading proficiency modulates parafoveal processing efficiency: Evidence from reading Chinese as a second language. Acta Psychologica 152, pages 29-33.
Crossref
Hans A. Trukenbrod & Ralf Engbert. (2014) ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21:4, pages 907-934.
Crossref
Elizabeth R. Schotter, Klinton Bicknell, Ian Howard, Roger Levy & Keith Rayner. (2014) Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: Evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading. Cognition 131:1, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Yanping Liu, Erik D. Reichle & Ding-Guo Gao. (2013) Using Reinforcement Learning to Examine Dynamic Attention Allocation During Reading. Cognitive Science 37:8, pages 1507-1540.
Crossref
Elizabeth R. Schotter. (2013) Synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in English. Journal of Memory and Language 69:4, pages 619-633.
Crossref
Daniel J. Schad, Antje Nuthmann & Ralf Engbert. (2012) Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition 125:2, pages 179-194.
Crossref
Jie-Li Tsai, Reinhold Kliegl & Ming Yan. (2012) Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica 141:1, pages 17-23.
Crossref

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.