Publication Cover
Journal of Sexual Aggression
An international, interdisciplinary forum for research, theory and practice
Volume 19, 2013 - Issue 3
706
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Predictive validity of the Static-99R and its dimensions

&
Pages 311-328 | Published online: 10 Dec 2012

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (6)

Skye Stephens, Ian V. McPhail, Ainslie Heasman & Cory Gerritsen. (2023) Examining psychologically meaningful risk factors for detected sexual offending in a community sample of individuals with and without sexual interest in children. Journal of Sexual Aggression 0:0, pages 1-20.
Read now
Anna T. Pham & Sandy Jung. (2022) Risk Constructs Behind Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment. Victims & Offenders 0:0, pages 1-17.
Read now
Sarah Moss, Skye Stephens & Michael C. Seto. (2022) The association between sentencing and recidivism in men who have committed a sexual offence. Journal of Sexual Aggression 28:3, pages 407-424.
Read now
Andrew J. Myer. (2019) Examining the Predictive Validity of the Static-99R on Native American Sex Offenders. Justice Evaluation Journal 2:2, pages 181-195.
Read now
Skye Stephens, Jennifer E. Newman, James M. Cantor & Michael C. Seto. (2018) The Static-99R predicts sexual and violent recidivism for individuals with low intellectual functioning. Journal of Sexual Aggression 24:1, pages 1-11.
Read now
Mark E. Olver, Gabrielle Klepfisz, Keira C. Stockdale, Drew A. Kingston, Terry P. Nicholaichuk & Stephen C. P. Wong. (2016) Some notes on the validation of VRS-SO static scores. Journal of Sexual Aggression 22:2, pages 147-160.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (11)

Martina Faitakis, Skye Stephens & Michael C. Seto. (2023) The Predictive Validity of the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2). Sexual Abuse 35:5, pages 649-663.
Crossref
Sébastien Brouillette-Alarie, Seung C. Lee, Nicholas Longpré & Kelly M. Babchishin. (2022) An Examination of the Latent Constructs in Risk Tools for Individuals Who Sexually Offend: Applying Multidimensional Item Response Theory to the Static-2002R. Assessment 30:4, pages 1249-1264.
Crossref
Rebecca L. Crookes, Carlo Tramontano, Sarah J. Brown, Kate Walker & Hayley Wright. (2021) Older Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses: A Literature Review. Sexual Abuse 34:3, pages 341-371.
Crossref
Sébastien Brouillette-Alarie & Jean Proulx. (2018) The Etiology of Risk in Sexual Offenders: A Preliminary Model. Sexual Abuse 31:4, pages 431-455.
Crossref
Sophie G. Reeves, James R. P. Ogloff & Melanie Simmons. (2017) The Predictive Validity of the Static-99, Static-99R, and Static-2002/R: Which One to Use?. Sexual Abuse 30:8, pages 887-907.
Crossref
Sébastien Brouillette-Alarie, Jean Proulx & R. Karl Hanson. (2017) Three Central Dimensions of Sexual Recidivism Risk: Understanding the Latent Constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse 30:6, pages 676-704.
Crossref
Alejandro Leguízamo, Seung C. Lee, Elizabeth L. Jeglic & Cynthia Calkins. (2015) Utility of the Static-99 and Static-99R With Latino Sex Offenders. Sexual Abuse 29:8, pages 765-785.
Crossref
Sandy Jung, Liam Ennis, Chantal A. Hermann, Anna T. Pham, Alberto L. Choy, Gabriela Corabian & Tarah Hook. (2016) An Evaluation of the Reliability, Construct Validity, and Factor Structure of the Static-2002R. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 61:4, pages 464-487.
Crossref
Sébastien Brouillette-Alarie, Kelly M. Babchishin, R. Karl Hanson & Leslie-Maaike Helmus. (2015) Latent Constructs of the Static-99R and Static-2002R. Assessment 23:1, pages 96-111.
Crossref
Caroline Logan. 2016. Treatment of Sex Offenders. Treatment of Sex Offenders 83 105 .
Amy Phenix & Douglas L. Epperson. 2016. Sexual Offending. Sexual Offending 437 455 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.