Citations (75)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (29)
Saeed Latifi, Omid Noroozi & Ebrahim Talaee. (2023) Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments 31:2, pages 655-669.
Read now
Read now
Lili Pâquet & Ariella Van Luyn. (2022) ‘Things living in the cyber-universe’: facilitating peer workshopping in the online creative non-fiction classroom. New Writing 19:4, pages 391-407.
Read now
Read now
Brian A. Vander Schee & Tim Dugan Birrittella. (2021) Hybrid and Online Peer Group Grading: Adding Assessment Efficiency While Maintaining Perceived Fairness. Marketing Education Review 31:4, pages 275-283.
Read now
Read now
Jian-Wei Lin, Chia-Wen Tsai, Chu-Ching Hsu & Lung-Chun Chang. (2021) Peer assessment with group awareness tools and effects on project-based learning. Interactive Learning Environments 29:4, pages 583-599.
Read now
Read now
Jiandong Wang, Ruiqin Gao, Xiuyan Guo & Jin Liu. (2020) Factors associated with students’ attitude change in online peer assessment – a mixed methods study in a graduate-level course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:5, pages 714-727.
Read now
Read now
Tami Seifert & Orna Feliks. (2019) Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:2, pages 169-185.
Read now
Read now
Jian-Wei Lin. (2018) Effects of an online team project-based learning environment with group awareness and peer evaluation on socially shared regulation of learning and self-regulated learning. Behaviour & Information Technology 37:5, pages 445-461.
Read now
Read now
Xiongyi Liu, Lan Li & Zhihong Zhang. (2018) Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:2, pages 207-222.
Read now
Read now
Lan Li. (2017) The role of anonymity in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:4, pages 645-656.
Read now
Read now
Josh McCarthy. (2016) Global learning partnerships in the Café: peer feedback as a formative assessment tool for animation students. Interactive Learning Environments 24:6, pages 1298-1318.
Read now
Read now
Lan Li & Fei Gao. (2016) The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:6, pages 885-900.
Read now
Read now
Richard Tucker & Neda Abbasi. (2015) The architecture of teamwork: examining relationships between teaching, assessment, student learning and satisfaction with creative design outcomes. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 11:6, pages 405-422.
Read now
Read now
Kun-Hung Cheng, Huei-Tse Hou & Sheng-Yi Wu. (2014) Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: a case study. Interactive Learning Environments 22:3, pages 271-287.
Read now
Read now
Leah Marks & Maria Jackson. (2013) Student Experience of Peer Assessment on an MSc Programme. Bioscience Education 21:1, pages 20-28.
Read now
Read now
Markus Mostert & Jen
D. Snowball. (2013) Where angels fear to tread: online peer-assessment in a large first-year class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38:6, pages 674-686.
Read now
Read now
Boulent Imam, M. Imran Rafiq & Prashant Kumar. (2011) Improving student learning in engineering discipline using student- and lecturer-led assessment approaches. European Journal of Higher Education 1:2-3, pages 233-248.
Read now
Read now
Xin Guo. (2011) Understanding Student Plagiarism: An Empirical Study in Accounting Education. Accounting Education 20:1, pages 17-37.
Read now
Read now
Andrew Luxton-Reilly. (2009) A systematic review of tools that support peer assessment. Computer Science Education 19:4, pages 209-232.
Read now
Read now
Christine Brew, Philip Riley & Caroline Walta. (2009) Education students and their teachers: comparing views on participative assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34:6, pages 641-657.
Read now
Read now
Phil Davies. (2009) Review and reward within the computerised peer‐assessment of essays. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34:3, pages 321-333.
Read now
Read now
Ying‐Chih Chen & Chin‐Chung Tsai. (2009) An educational research course facilitated by online peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 46:1, pages 105-117.
Read now
Read now
Meichun Lydia Wen & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2008) Online peer assessment in an inservice science and mathematics teacher education course. Teaching in Higher Education 13:1, pages 55-67.
Read now
Read now
Meichun Lydia Wen, Chin‐Chung Tsai & Chun‐Yen Chang. (2006) Attitudes towards peer assessment: a comparison of the perspectives of pre‐service and in‐service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43:1, pages 83-92.
Read now
Read now
Phil Davies. (2006) Peer assessment: judging the quality of students’ work by comments rather than marks. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43:1, pages 69-82.
Read now
Read now
KeithJ. Topping. (2005) Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology 25:6, pages 631-645.
Read now
Read now
Roger Bennett
. (2005) Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post‐1992 university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30:2, pages 137-162.
Read now
Read now
Chen‐Chung Liu
& Chun‐Ming Tsai. (2005) Peer assessment through web‐based knowledge acquisition: tools to support conceptual awareness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 42:1, pages 43-59.
Read now
Read now
Phil Davies. (2003) Closing the communications loop on the computerized peer-assessment of essays. ALT-J 11:1, pages 41-54.
Read now
Read now
Roy Ballantyne, Karen Hughes & Aliisa Mylonas. (2002) Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27:5, pages 427-441.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (46)
Gwo-Jen Hwang, Di Zou & Ying-Xuan Wu. (2023) Learning by storytelling and critiquing: a peer assessment-enhanced digital storytelling approach to promoting young students’ information literacy, self-efficacy, and critical thinking awareness. Educational technology research and development 71:3, pages 1079-1103.
Crossref
Crossref
Teresa Michelle Pidduck & Nadia Bauer. (2021) Perceptions of online self- and peer-assessment: accounting students in a large undergraduate cohort. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 14:4, pages 1480-1495.
Crossref
Crossref
Gabriel Badea & Elvira Popescu. (2022) A dynamic review allocation approach for peer assessment in technology enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies 27:9, pages 13131-13162.
Crossref
Crossref
Kok Yueh Lee, David Hassell, Shana Mat Salleh & Thulasimani Munohsamy. (2021) Online-based Rubric for Peer Assessment: Effectiveness and Implications. SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) 4:2, pages 14-24.
Crossref
Crossref
Lan Li, Fei Gao & Shuqing Guo. (2019) The effects of social messaging on students' learning and intrinsic motivation in peer assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36:4, pages 439-448.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiongyi Liu, Lan Li & Patrick Wachira. 2020. Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education. Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education
245
260
.
Rebecca Grainger, Wei Dai, Emma Osborne & Diane Kenwright. (2018) Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study. BMC Medical Education 18:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Anne Schink, Katerina Naumoska, Zoran Kitanovski, Christopher Johannes Kampf, Janine Fröhlich-Nowoisky, Eckhard Thines, Ulrich Pöschl, Detlef Schuppan & Kurt Lucas. (2018) Anti-inflammatory effects of cinnamon extract and identification of active compounds influencing the TLR2 and TLR4 signaling pathways. Food & Function 9:11, pages 5950-5964.
Crossref
Crossref
Celia Durkin, Federico Rossano & Scott Klemmer. (2018) Score-Group Framing Negatively Impacts Peer Evaluations. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2:CSCW, pages 1-19.
Crossref
Crossref
Christine E. King. (2018) Feasibility and Acceptability of Peer Assessment for Coding Assignments in Large Lecture Based Programming Engineering Courses. Feasibility and Acceptability of Peer Assessment for Coding Assignments in Large Lecture Based Programming Engineering Courses.
. (2018) The science and art of can‐do learning. Foreign Language Annals 51:2, pages 267-269.
Crossref
Crossref
Caroline T. W. Chan. (2018) Improving Peer and Self-assessment for Group Presentations from Chinese Students’ Perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 8:3, pages 205-212.
Crossref
Crossref
Josh McCarthy. (2017) Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education 18:2, pages 127-141.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Martos-Garcia, Oidui Usabiaga & Alexandra Valencia-Peris. (2017) Students’ Perception on Formative and Shared Assessment: Connecting two Universities through the Blogosphere. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 6:1, pages 64-70.
Crossref
Crossref
Gwo-Jen Hwang, Zi-Yun Liang & Hsiu-Ying Wang. (2016) An Online Peer Assessment-Based Programming Approach to Improving Students' Programming Knowledge and Skills. An Online Peer Assessment-Based Programming Approach to Improving Students' Programming Knowledge and Skills.
Catherine M. Hicks, Vineet Pandey, C. Ailie Fraser & Scott Klemmer. (2016) Framing Feedback. Framing Feedback.
Olia E. Tsivitanidou & Constantinos P. Constantinou. (2016) A study of students' heuristics and strategy patterns in web-based reciprocal peer assessment for science learning. The Internet and Higher Education 29, pages 12-22.
Crossref
Crossref
Zainab Abolfazli Khonbi & Karim Sadeghi. (2013) The Effect of Assessment Type (Self Vs. Peer) on Iranian University EFL Students’ Course Achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 70, pages 1552-1564.
Crossref
Crossref
Chi-Cheng Chang, Chaoyun Liang & Yi-Hui Chen. (2013) Is learner self-assessment reliable and valid in a Web-based portfolio environment for high school students?. Computers & Education 60:1, pages 325-334.
Crossref
Crossref
Lan Li, Xiongyi Liu & Yuchun Zhou. (2011) Give and take: A re‐analysis of assessor and assessee's roles in technology‐facilitated peer assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology 43:3, pages 376-384.
Crossref
Crossref
Gülten Kavas & Nesrin Özdener. (2012) Effects of Video-Supported Web-Based Peer Assessment on Microteaching Applications: Computer Teacher Candidates Sample. Creative Education 03:07, pages 1221-1230.
Crossref
Crossref
Chi-Cheng Chang, Kuo-Hung Tseng & Shi-Jer Lou. (2012) A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education 58:1, pages 303-320.
Crossref
Crossref
Shu-Hsuan Chang, Mei-Ling Chen, Yen-Kuang Kuo & Yung-Chi Shen. (2011) A Simulation-Based LED Design Project in Photonics Instruction Based on Industry–University Collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Education 54:4, pages 582-589.
Crossref
Crossref
Fu-Yun Yu & Chun-Ping Wu. (2011) Different identity revelation modes in an online peer-assessment learning environment: Effects on perceptions toward assessors, classroom climate and learning activities. Computers & Education 57:3, pages 2167-2177.
Crossref
Crossref
Chi-Cheng Chang, Kuo-Hung Tseng, Pao-Nan Chou & Yi-Hui Chen. (2011) Reliability and validity of Web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study for a senior high school’s students taking computer course. Computers & Education 57:1, pages 1306-1316.
Crossref
Crossref
Julia H. Kaufman & Christian D. Schunn. (2010) Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science 39:3, pages 387-406.
Crossref
Crossref
Fu-Yun Yu. (2011) Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes. Computers & Education 56:2, pages 484-494.
Crossref
Crossref
Chao-hsiu Chen. (2010) The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education 55:1, pages 229-236.
Crossref
Crossref
Lan Li, Xiongyi Liu & Allen L. Steckelberg. (2010) Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology 41:3, pages 525-536.
Crossref
Crossref
Yu-Fang Yang & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2010) Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction 20:1, pages 72-83.
Crossref
Crossref
Gamze Ozogul & Howard Sullivan. (2007) Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self and peer evaluators. Educational Technology Research and Development 57:3, pages 393-410.
Crossref
Crossref
Chin-Chung Tsai & Jyh-Chong Liang. (2007) The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science 37:3, pages 293-310.
Crossref
Crossref
Chin-Chung Tsai. 2009. Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level. Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level
743
754
.
J. Sitthiworachart & M. Joy. (2007) Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24:3, pages 217-231.
Crossref
Crossref
Victoria Crisp & Christine Ward. (2008) The development of a formative scenario-based computer assisted assessment tool in psychology for teachers: The PePCAA project. Computers & Education 50:4, pages 1509-1526.
Crossref
Crossref
Gamze Ozogul, Zane Olina & Howard Sullivan. (2006) Teacher, self and peer evaluation of lesson plans written by preservice teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development 56:2, pages 181-201.
Crossref
Crossref
Paul Chin. (2007) Peer Assessment. New Directions:3, pages 13-18.
Crossref
Crossref
Yael Kali. (2006) Collaborative knowledge building using the Design Principles Database. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1:2, pages 187-201.
Crossref
Crossref
Meichun Lydia Wen & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2006) University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward (Online) Peer Assessment. Higher Education 51:1, pages 27-44.
Crossref
Crossref
Donald Chinn. (2005) Peer assessment in the algorithms course. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 37:3, pages 69-73.
Crossref
Crossref
Jirarat Sitthiworachart & Mike Joy. (2004) Effective peer assessment for learning computer programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 36:3, pages 122-126.
Crossref
Crossref
Eric T. K. Lim & Ian Weber. (2011) In Search of the Total Learning Experience (TLE): A Case Study of Singapore's e-Inclusive Society. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management 03:03, pages 233-243.
Crossref
Crossref
S. Lewis & P. Davies. (2004) Automated peer-assisted assessment of programming skills. Automated peer-assisted assessment of programming skills.
Phil Davies. (2003) Closing the communications loop on the computerized peer-assessment of essays. Research in Learning Technology 11:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Keith Topping. 2003. Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards. Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards
55
87
.
Antonio Diaz. (2011) Continuous Assessment in Large Groups: A Proposal. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref