701
Views
96
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development

Pages 71-81 | Published online: 10 Dec 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (38)

Wing Shui Ng & Guoxing Yu. (2023) Students’ attitude to peer assessment process: a critical factor for success. Interactive Learning Environments 31:5, pages 2967-2985.
Read now
Lu Cheng, Yanyan Li, You Su & Lei Gao. (2023) Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48:4, pages 451-463.
Read now
Oluseyi Oluseun Adesina, Olufunbi Alaba Adesina, Ismail Adelopo & Godfred Adjappong Afrifa. (2023) Managing group work: the impact of peer assessment on student engagement. Accounting Education 32:1, pages 90-113.
Read now
Zheng Zong, Yanqing Wang & Christian Dieter Schunn. (2021) Why students want to provide feedback to their peers: Drivers of feedback quantity and variation by type of course. Journal of Psychology in Africa 31:4, pages 336-343.
Read now
Jiandong Wang, Ruiqin Gao, Xiuyan Guo & Jin Liu. (2020) Factors associated with students’ attitude change in online peer assessment – a mixed methods study in a graduate-level course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:5, pages 714-727.
Read now
Monika Bader, Tony Burner, Sarah Hoem Iversen & Zoltan Varga. (2019) Student perspectives on formative feedback as part of writing portfolios. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:7, pages 1017-1028.
Read now
Dominique-Esther Seroussi, Rakefet Sharon, Yehuda Peled & Yosi Yaffe. (2019) Reflections on peer feedback in disciplinary courses as a tool in pre-service teacher training. Cambridge Journal of Education 49:5, pages 655-671.
Read now
Marelize Malan & Nerine Stegmann. (2018) Accounting students’ experiences of peer assessment: A tool to develop lifelong learning. South African Journal of Accounting Research 32:2-3, pages 205-224.
Read now
Daniel Reinholz. (2017) Peer conferences in calculus: the impact of systematic training. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:1, pages 1-17.
Read now
Daniel Reinholz. (2016) The assessment cycle: a model for learning through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:2, pages 301-315.
Read now
Parviz Birjandi & Masood Siyyari. (2016) Agreeableness and Conscientiousness as predictors of university students’ self/peer-assessment rating error. Irish Educational Studies 35:1, pages 117-135.
Read now
Daniel Jeffery, Krassimir Yankulov, Alison Crerar & Kerry Ritchie. (2016) How to achieve accurate peer assessment for high value written assignments in a senior undergraduate course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:1, pages 127-140.
Read now
Scott Ashton & Randall S. Davies. (2015) Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course. Distance Education 36:3, pages 312-334.
Read now
Roger Barnard, Rosemary de Luca & Jinrui Li. (2015) First-year undergraduate students’ perceptions of lecturer and peer feedback: a New Zealand action research project. Studies in Higher Education 40:5, pages 933-944.
Read now
Annelies Raes, Ellen Vanderhoven & Tammy Schellens. (2015) Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within face-to-face higher education. Studies in Higher Education 40:1, pages 178-193.
Read now
Robyn Yucel, Fiona L. Bird, Jodie Young & Tania Blanksby. (2014) The road to self-assessment: exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39:8, pages 971-986.
Read now
Kun-Hung Cheng, Huei-Tse Hou & Sheng-Yi Wu. (2014) Exploring students’ emotional responses and participation in an online peer assessment activity: a case study. Interactive Learning Environments 22:3, pages 271-287.
Read now
Omaima A. G. Hassan, Alison Fox & Gwen Hannah. (2014) Self- and Peer-Assessment: Evidence from the Accounting and Finance Discipline. Accounting Education 23:3, pages 225-243.
Read now
Paula Hodgson, Kitty Chan & Justina Liu. (2014) Outcomes of synergetic peer assessment: first-year experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39:2, pages 168-178.
Read now
Chloe Patton. (2012) ‘Some kind of weird, evil experiment’: student perceptions of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37:6, pages 719-731.
Read now
Fatma Sasmaz Oren. (2012) The effects of gender and previous experience on the approach of self and peer assessment: a case from Turkey. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49:2, pages 123-133.
Read now
Michael T. Buchanan & Julian Stern. (2012) Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the benefits of peer review. Journal of Education for Teaching 38:1, pages 37-49.
Read now
MichaelT. Buchanan. (2011) Peer Reviewing Preservice Teachers of Christian Higher Education. Christian Higher Education 10:5, pages 464-481.
Read now
Edmond Alkaslassy. (2011) How often do students working in two‐person teams report that work was shared equitably?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36:3, pages 367-375.
Read now
Paula Hodgson & Dora Wong. (2011) Developing professional skills in journalism through blogs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36:2, pages 197-211.
Read now
Sarah Gielen, Filip Dochy & Patrick Onghena. (2011) An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36:2, pages 137-155.
Read now
Mark Pulman. (2010) Assessing personal attributes in the group rehearsal. Music Education Research 12:4, pages 395-414.
Read now
Ali Al-Barakat & Omayya Al-Hassan. (2009) Peer assessment as a learning tool for enhancing student teachers' preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 37:4, pages 399-413.
Read now
Jennifer Seddon. (2008) Vets and videos: student learning from context‐based assessment in a pre‐clinical science course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33:5, pages 559-566.
Read now
Victor Forrester & Marina Wong. (2008) Curriculum reform in the Hong Kong primary classroom: what gives?. Music Education Research 10:2, pages 271-284.
Read now
Meichun Lydia Wen, Chin‐Chung Tsai & Chun‐Yen Chang. (2006) Attitudes towards peer assessment: a comparison of the perspectives of pre‐service and in‐service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 43:1, pages 83-92.
Read now
A. W. Evans , C. McKenna & M. Oliver. (2005) Trainees' perspectives on the assessment and self‐assessment of surgical skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30:2, pages 163-174.
Read now
Nigel K. Ll. Pope . (2005) The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30:1, pages 51-63.
Read now
Deanna D. Sellnow & Kristen P. Treinen. (2004) The role of gender in perceived speaker competence: an analysis of student peer critiques. Communication Education 53:3, pages 286-296.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (58)

Samaher Nama & Michal Ayalon. (2023) Exploring change in secondary mathematics teachers' noticing of argumentation through experiencing peer-assessment strategies. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.
Crossref
Dominique-Esther Seroussi, Yehuda Peled, Rakefet Sharon, Nathan Rothschild, Osnat Halperin Barlev, Eyal Weissblueth & Gal Harpaz. (2023) ‘A Different Voice’ in Peer Feedback: Gender Specificity in Students’ Willingness to Provide Peer Feedback. Education Sciences 13:7, pages 654.
Crossref
Andrew Bartlett, Jessica Pace, Angela Arora & Jonathan Penm. (2022) Self-Reflection and Peer-Assessments Effect on Pharmacy Students’ Performance at Simulated Counselling Sessions. Pharmacy 11:1, pages 5.
Crossref
Haining Zhu, Na Li, Nitish Kumar Rai & John M. Carroll. (2022) SmartGroup: A Tool for Small-Group Learning Activities. Future Internet 15:1, pages 7.
Crossref
Osman ÇİL. (2022) Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Perspectives Around the Peer Assessment Process During an Academic Poster SessionSınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Akademik Poster Sunumu Sırasındaki Akran Değerlendirme Sürecine Yönelik Görüşleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 8:1, pages 317-334.
Crossref
Crook Stephanie. (2022) A Social-Constructionist Review of Feedback and Revision Research: How Perceptions of Written Feedback Might Influence Understandings of Revision Processes. College Composition & Communication 73:3, pages 593-614.
Crossref
Michal Ayalon & Karina J. Wilkie. (2020) Investigating peer-assessment strategies for mathematics pre-service teacher learning on formative assessment. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 24:4, pages 399-426.
Crossref
Dayane Daou, Ramzi Sabra & Nathalie K. Zgheib. (2020) Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design. Medical Science Educator 30:3, pages 1145-1156.
Crossref
Ya‐Ching Fan, Tzu‐Hua Wang & Kuo‐Hua Wang. (2020) Studying the effectiveness of an online argumentation model for improving undergraduate students' argumentation ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36:4, pages 526-539.
Crossref
Kit S. Double, Joshua A. McGrane & Therese N. Hopfenbeck. (2019) The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies. Educational Psychology Review 32:2, pages 481-509.
Crossref
Xiongyi Liu, Lan Li & Patrick Wachira. 2020. Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education. Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education 245 260 .
Nagihan BOZTUNÇ ÖZTÜRK, Melek Gülşah ŞAHİN & Mustafa İLHAN. (2019) An analysis of scoring via analytic rubric and general impression in peer assessmentAkran değerlendirmede analitik rubrikle ve genel izlenimle yapılan puanlamaların incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Education 8:4, pages 258-275.
Crossref
Abdelkarim Zaid, Abdelghani Babori & Hicham Fassi-Fihri. (2019) L’évaluation comme objet de recherche dans les MOOC : prise en compte du contenuAssessment as an object of research in MOOCs: taking content into account. Questions vives recherches en éducation:N° 31.
Crossref
Sharon Gedye & Emily Beaumont. (2018) “The ability to get a job”: student understandings and definitions of employability. Education + Training 60:5, pages 406-420.
Crossref
Caroline T. W. Chan. (2018) Improving Peer and Self-assessment for Group Presentations from Chinese Students’ Perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 8:3, pages 205-212.
Crossref
Olia E. Tsivitanidou, Costas P. Constantinou, Peter Labudde, Silke Rönnebeck & Mathias Ropohl. (2017) Reciprocal peer assessment as a learning tool for secondary school students in modeling-based learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1, pages 51-73.
Crossref
신동희. (2017) The Reliability of Self- and Peer Assessment and Students’ Perceptions toward Peer and Teacher Assessment. Journal of the Korea English Education Society 16:4, pages 19-43.
Crossref
Scott S. Douglas, John M. Aiken, Shih-Yin Lin, Edwin F. Greco, Emily Alicea-Muñoz & Michael F. Schatz. (2017) Peer assessment of student-produced mechanics lab report videos. Physical Review Physics Education Research 13:2.
Crossref
Fuhui Zhang, Christian D. Schunn & Alok Baikadi. (2017) Charting the routes to revision: An interplay of writing goals, peer comments, and self-reflections from peer reviews. Instructional Science 45:5, pages 679-707.
Crossref
Gunter Bombaerts & Philip J. Nickel. (2017) Feedback for relatedness and competence: Can feedback in blended learning contribute to optimal rigor, basic needs, and motivation?. Feedback for relatedness and competence: Can feedback in blended learning contribute to optimal rigor, basic needs, and motivation?.
Helen Wauck, Yu-Chun (Grace) Yen, Wai-Tat Fu, Elizabeth Gerber, Steven P. Dow & Brian P. Bailey. (2017) From in the Class or in the Wild?. From in the Class or in the Wild?.
Lanqin ZhengLanqin Zheng. 2017. Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 129 144 .
Chin-Yuan Lai. (2016) Training nursing students' communication skills with online video peer assessment. Computers & Education 97, pages 21-30.
Crossref
Christina A. Geithner & Alexandria N. Pollastro. (2016) Doing peer review and receiving feedback: impact on scientific literacy and writing skills. Advances in Physiology Education 40:1, pages 38-46.
Crossref
Anna Faherty. (2015) Developing enterprise skills through peer-assessed pitch presentations. Education + Training 57:3, pages 290-305.
Crossref
Kun-Hung Cheng, Jyh-Chong Liang & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2015) Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education 25, pages 78-84.
Crossref
Ellen Vanderhoven, Annelies Raes, Hannelore Montrieux, Tijs Rotsaert & Tammy Schellens. (2015) What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study. Computers & Education 81, pages 123-132.
Crossref
Kavitha Sukumaran & Rozita Dass. (2014) Students’ Perspectives on the Use of Peer Feedback in an English as a Second Language Writing Class. Journal for Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE) 4:1.
Crossref
Mahmoud F. Alquraan. (2014) A cross-cultural study of students’ perceptions of assessment practices in higher education. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues 7:4, pages 293-315.
Crossref
Ernesto Panadero, Margarida Romero & Jan-Willem Strijbos. (2013) The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort. Studies in Educational Evaluation 39:4, pages 195-203.
Crossref
Rachel Or-Bach & Marije van Amelsvoort. (2013) Supporting Asynchronous Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design 3:4, pages 1-15.
Crossref
Bin-Shyan Jong, Chien-Hung Lai, Yen-Teh Hsia & Tsong-Wuu Lin. (2013) Effects of Anonymity in Group Discussion on Peer Interaction and Learning Achievement. IEEE Transactions on Education 56:3, pages 292-299.
Crossref
Ellen Vanderhoven, Annelies Raes, Tammy Schellens & Hannelore Montrieux. (2012) Face-to-Face Peer Assessment in Secondary Education: Does Anonymity Matter?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 69, pages 1340-1347.
Crossref
Mario Gielen & Bram De Wever. (2012) Peer Assessment in a Wiki: Product Improvement, Students’ Learning And Perception Regarding Peer Feedback. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 69, pages 585-594.
Crossref
Cheong Yoo Seock. (2012) Experiences Using Peer Assessment on Small Group Discussions in Medical Ethics. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics 15:1, pages 70-77.
Crossref
Chien-Hung Lai, Bin-Shyan Jong, Yen-Teh Hsia, Pai-Feng Lee & Te-Yi Chan. (2011) Systematic analysis of peer interaction in cooperative learning. Systematic analysis of peer interaction in cooperative learning.
Olia E. Tsivitanidou, Zacharias C. Zacharia & Tasos Hovardas. (2011) Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills. Learning and Instruction 21:4, pages 506-519.
Crossref
Judy R. Harris. (2011) Peer assessment in large undergraduate classes: an evaluation of a procedure for marking laboratory reports and a review of related practices. Advances in Physiology Education 35:2, pages 178-187.
Crossref
Julia H. Kaufman & Christian D. Schunn. (2010) Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science 39:3, pages 387-406.
Crossref
Sy‐Chyi Wang. (2011) Expert Panel: A New Strategy for Creating a Student‐Centred Learning Environment for Software Applications. International Journal of Art & Design Education 30:1, pages 113-122.
Crossref
Catherine D. Saylor, Nancy T. Keselyak, Melanie Simmer-Beck & Daniel Tira. (2011) Evaluation of Social Interaction, Task Management, and Trust Among Dental Hygiene Students in a Collaborative Learning Environment. Journal of Dental Education 75:2, pages 180-189.
Crossref
Melissa C. Marty, Jolene M. Henning & John T. Willse. (2010) Accuracy and Reliability of Peer Assessment of Athletic Training Psychomotor Laboratory Skills. Journal of Athletic Training 45:6, pages 609-614.
Crossref
Marjo van Zundert, Dominique Sluijsmans & Jeroen van Merriënboer. (2010) Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction 20:4, pages 270-279.
Crossref
Jan-Willem Strijbos & Dominique Sluijsmans. (2010) Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction 20:4, pages 265-269.
Crossref
Martin E. Purcell & Murray Hawtin. (2010) Piloting external peer review as a model for performance improvement in third‐sector organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 20:3, pages 357-374.
Crossref
Gamze Ozogul & Howard Sullivan. (2007) Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self and peer evaluators. Educational Technology Research and Development 57:3, pages 393-410.
Crossref
Chin-Chung Tsai & Jyh-Chong Liang. (2007) The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views. Instructional Science 37:3, pages 293-310.
Crossref
Chin-Chung Tsai. 2009. Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level. Handbook of Research on New Media Literacy at the K-12 Level 743 754 .
Gamze Ozogul, Zane Olina & Howard Sullivan. (2006) Teacher, self and peer evaluation of lesson plans written by preservice teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development 56:2, pages 181-201.
Crossref
YAEL KALI & MIKY RONEN. (2008) ASSESSING THE ASSESSORS: ADDED VALUE IN WEB-BASED MULTI-CYCLE PEER ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 03:01, pages 3-32.
Crossref
C.K. Chang, G.D. Chen & L.Y. Li. (2008) Constructing a community of practice to improve coursework activity. Computers & Education 50:1, pages 235-247.
Crossref
Sheng-Chau Tseng & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2007) On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education 49:4, pages 1161-1174.
Crossref
Gina Turner & Michael F. Schober. (2007) Feedback on Collaborative Skills in Remote Studio Design. Feedback on Collaborative Skills in Remote Studio Design.
Udo Konradt & Yasmin Fary. (2006) Determinanten der Motivation und der Bereitschaft zur Teilnahme an Fragebogenstudien. Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology 214:2, pages 87-96.
Crossref
Meichun Lydia Wen & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2006) University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward (Online) Peer Assessment. Higher Education 51:1, pages 27-44.
Crossref
Jacqueline A. Blackmore. (2005) A critical evaluation of peer review via teaching observation within higher education. International Journal of Educational Management 19:3, pages 218-232.
Crossref
Ibrahim AlFallay. (2004) The role of some selected psychological and personality traits of the rater in the accuracy of self- and peer-assessment. System 32:3, pages 407-425.
Crossref
Vorakorn Tuvachit & Kittitouch Soontornwipast. (2018) Integrating Adapted Approaches of Writing Instructions With Alternative Assessment to Improve Academic Writing Ability. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.