602
Views
86
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Impact of Innovative Assessment on Student Learning

Pages 302-313 | Published online: 09 Jul 2006

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (30)

Cynthia S. Deale & Seung-Hyun Lee. (2023) Hospitality and Tourism Educators’ Perceptions of Grading. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education 35:1, pages 1-14.
Read now
Adina Dudau, Georgios Kominis & Melinda Szocs. (2018) Innovation failure in the eye of the beholder: towards a theory of innovation shaped by competing agendas within higher education. Public Management Review 20:2, pages 254-272.
Read now
Sang-Bin Lee. (2017) University students’ experience of ‘scale-referenced’ peer assessment for a consecutive interpreting examination. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:7, pages 1015-1029.
Read now
Alf Lizzio & Keithia Wilson. (2013) First-year students’ appraisal of assessment tasks: implications for efficacy, engagement and performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38:4, pages 389-406.
Read now
Evangelia Karagiannopoulou & Fotios S. Milienos. (2013) Exploring the relationship between experienced students' preference for open- and closed-book examinations, approaches to learning and achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation 19:4, pages 271-296.
Read now
Chloe Patton. (2012) ‘Some kind of weird, evil experiment’: student perceptions of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37:6, pages 719-731.
Read now
Sandra Fernandes, Maria Assunção Flores & Rui Manuel Lima. (2012) Students’ views of assessment in project-led engineering education: findings from a case study in Portugal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 37:2, pages 163-178.
Read now
Phil Klein, Munazza Fatima, Lindsey McEwen, SusanneC. Moser, Deanna Schmidt & Sandra Zupan. (2011) Dismantling the Ivory Tower: Engaging Geographers in University–Community Partnerships. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 35:3, pages 425-444.
Read now
AndrewM. Cox, Ana Cristina Vasconcelos & Peter Holdridge. (2010) Diversifying assessment through multimedia creation in a non‐technical module: reflections on the MAIK project. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35:7, pages 831-846.
Read now
Cathy Walsh, Damian Parry & Carl Larsen. (2010) Blending learning: a Novel Assessment Strategy Enhancing Student Learning from Practical Work in the Laboratory. Bioscience Education 15:1, pages 1-6.
Read now
MagdeleineD.N. Lew, W.A.M. Alwis & HenkG. Schmidt. (2010) Accuracy of students' self‐assessment and their beliefs about its utility. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35:2, pages 135-156.
Read now
Christine Brew, Philip Riley & Caroline Walta. (2009) Education students and their teachers: comparing views on participative assessment practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34:6, pages 641-657.
Read now
Ali Al-Barakat & Omayya Al-Hassan. (2009) Peer assessment as a learning tool for enhancing student teachers' preparation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 37:4, pages 399-413.
Read now
HarmH. Tillema & Kari Smith. (2009) Assessment orientation in formative assessment of learning to teach. Teachers and Teaching 15:3, pages 391-405.
Read now
Minjeong Kim. (2009) The impact of an elaborated assessee’s role in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34:1, pages 105-114.
Read now
JudithT.M. Gulikers, TheoJ. Bastiaens, PaulA. Kirschner & Liesbeth Kester. (2008) Authenticity is in the eye of the beholder: student and teacher perceptions of assessment authenticity. Journal of Vocational Education & Training 60:4, pages 401-412.
Read now
NancyT. Davis, Evrim Genc Kumtepe & Mehmet Aydeniz. (2007) Fostering Continuous Improvement and Learning Through Peer Assessment: Part of an Integral Model of Assessment. Educational Assessment 12:2, pages 113-135.
Read now
Judith Gulikers, Theo Bastiaens & Paul Kirschner. (2006) Authentic assessment, student and teacher perceptions: the practical value of the five‐dimensional framework. Journal of Vocational Education & Training 58:3, pages 337-357.
Read now
Daniel Muijs. (2006) Measuring teacher effectiveness: Some methodological reflections. Educational Research and Evaluation 12:1, pages 53-74.
Read now
Ann Van den Broeck, Marie-Christine Opdenakker & Jan Van Damme. (2005) The Effects of Student Characteristics on Mathematics Achievement in Flemish TIMSS 1999 Data. Educational Research and Evaluation 11:2, pages 107-121.
Read now
Natascha Van Hattum-Janssen, José Augusto Pacheco & Rosa Maria Vasconcelos. (2004) The accuracy of student grading in first-year engineering courses. European Journal of Engineering Education 29:2, pages 291-298.
Read now
Andrew Rothwell & Sarit Ghelipter. (2003) The Developing Manager: Reflective Learning in Undergraduate Management Education. Reflective Practice 4:2, pages 241-257.
Read now
LindaB. Nilson. (2003) Improving Student Peer Feedback. College Teaching 51:1, pages 34-38.
Read now
Roy Ballantyne, Karen Hughes & Aliisa Mylonas. (2002) Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27:5, pages 427-441.
Read now
Janet Macdonald, Robin Mason & Nick Heap. (1999) Refining Assessment for Resource Based Learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24:3, pages 345-353.
Read now
F. Dochy, M. Segers & D. Sluijsmans. (1999) The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education 24:3, pages 331-350.
Read now
Karen Hinett, Caroline Maughan, Barbara Lee & Keith Stanton. (1999) Managing change in assessment and learning in legal education: A tale of two cities. The Law Teacher 33:2, pages 135-158.
Read now
Gordon Joughin. (1998) Dimensions of Oral Assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23:4, pages 367-378.
Read now
D. J. HARGREAVES. (1997) Student Learning and Assessment Are Inextricably Linked. European Journal of Engineering Education 22:4, pages 401-409.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (56)

Rana Asgarova, Anne Macaskill & Wokje Abrahamse. (2022) Authentic assessment targeting sustainability outcomes: a case study exploring student perceptions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 24:1, pages 28-45.
Crossref
Letebele Mphahlele. (2022) Students’ Perception of the Use of a Rubric and Peer Reviews in an Online Learning Environment. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15:11, pages 503.
Crossref
Anindita Desarkar, Ajanta Das & Chitrita Chaudhuri. (2022) Machine Learning Tool to Predict Student Categories After Outlier Removal. Journal of Information Technology Research 15:1, pages 1-18.
Crossref
Levent UZUN & Şevval ERTOK. (2020) Student Opinions on Task-Based Approach as Formative Evaluation versus Exam-Based Approach as Summative Evaluation in Education. Sakarya University Journal of Education, pages 226-250.
Crossref
Sarah Lerchenfeldt, Misa Mi & Marty Eng. (2019) The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education 19:1.
Crossref
Vedat Kızıl. (2019) İngilizce Yazı Yazma Derslerinde Akran Değerlendirmesi. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences 5:1, pages 101-111.
Crossref
Nicola Massy-Westropp, Eileen Giles, Rachaelle Dantu, Harsha Wechalekar & Arjun Burlakoti. (2019) Developing and evaluating virtual anatomy resources for teaching allied health disciplines. Research in Learning Technology 27:0.
Crossref
Raph Morgan. (2019) Using seminars as a teaching method in undergraduate nurse education. British Journal of Nursing 28:6, pages 374-376.
Crossref
Martijn J. M. Leenknecht & Frans J. Prins. (2017) Formative peer assessment in primary school: the effects of involving pupils in setting assessment criteria on their appraisal and feedback style. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1, pages 101-116.
Crossref
Seyedali Ahrari, Jamilah Bt. Othman, Md. Salleh Hassan, Bahaman Abu Samah & Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh. (2016) Using Network-Based Theory to Develop a Curriculum for Citizenship Education in Higher Institutions. Social Indicators Research 130:3, pages 1207-1228.
Crossref
Jos? Siles-Gonz?lez & Carmen Solano-Ruiz. (2016) Self-assessment, reflection on practice and critical thinking in nursing students. Nurse Education Today 45, pages 132-137.
Crossref
Diego Fernando Ubaque Casallas & Freddy Samir Pinilla Castellanos. (2016) Argumentation Skills: A Peer Assessment Approach to Discussions in the EFL Classroom. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development 18:2, pages 111.
Crossref
Lixun Wang. (2014) Employing Wikibook project in a linguistics course to promote peer teaching and learning. Education and Information Technologies 21:2, pages 453-470.
Crossref
Tekle Shanka. 2015. Proceedings of the 2002 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Proceedings of the 2002 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference 218 223 .
Kavitha Sukumaran & Rozita Dass. (2014) Students’ Perspectives on the Use of Peer Feedback in an English as a Second Language Writing Class. Journal for Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE) 4:1.
Crossref
Sinem Vatanartıran, Gülay Dalgıç & Şirin Karadeniz. (2014) Factors related with students' foreign language achievement. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi 4:3, pages 01-18.
Crossref
Tasos Hovardas, Olia E. Tsivitanidou & Zacharias C. Zacharia. (2014) Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Computers & Education 71, pages 133-152.
Crossref
Luís Tinoca, Alda Pereira & Isolina Oliveira. 2014. Handbook of Research on Transnational Higher Education. Handbook of Research on Transnational Higher Education 652 673 .
Harm Tillema. 2014. Designing Assessment for Quality Learning. Designing Assessment for Quality Learning 39 53 .
Alasdair Blair, Steven Curtis & Sam Mcginty. (2012) Is Peer Feedback an Effective Approach for Creating Dialogue in Politics?. European Political Science 12:1, pages 102-115.
Crossref
Machteld Vandecandelaere, Sara Speybroeck, Gudrun Vanlaar, Bieke De Fraine & Jan Van Damme. (2012) Learning environment and students’ mathematics attitude. Studies in Educational Evaluation 38:3-4, pages 107-120.
Crossref
Richard B. Fletcher, Luanna H. Meyer, Helen Anderson, Patricia Johnston & Malcolm Rees. (2011) Faculty and Students Conceptions of Assessment in Higher Education. Higher Education 64:1, pages 119-133.
Crossref
Jack Uzezi Gladys. (2012) Innovative and Effective Science Teaching Strategies for Quality Assurance in Nigerian Secondary Schools. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences 9:4, pages 173-179.
Crossref
Vicky S. Kritikos, Jim Woulfe, Maria B. Sukkar & Bandana Saini. (2011) Intergroup Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning Tutorials for Undergraduate Pharmacy Students. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 75:4, pages 73.
Crossref
Chris Phielix, Frans J. Prins, Paul A. Kirschner, Gijsbert Erkens & Jos Jaspers. (2011) Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior 27:3, pages 1087-1102.
Crossref
Harm Tillema, Martijn Leenknecht & Mien Segers. (2011) Assessing assessment quality: Criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning – A review of research studies. Studies in Educational Evaluation 37:1, pages 25-34.
Crossref
Nanine A.E. van Gennip, Mien S.R. Segers & Harm H. Tillema. (2010) Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction 20:4, pages 280-290.
Crossref
H. Tillema. 2010. International Encyclopedia of Education. International Encyclopedia of Education 563 571 .
Karen Stepanyan, Richard Mather, Cecil Hamilton-Jones & Carlo Lusuardi. (2009) Avoiding Pitfalls of Peer Assessment. Avoiding Pitfalls of Peer Assessment.
Jose A. Lopez-Salcedo & Gonzalo Seco-Granados. (2009) Tailoring Project-Based Learning for a communications engineering course. Tailoring Project-Based Learning for a communications engineering course.
Nanine A.E. van Gennip, Mien S.R. Segers & Harm H. Tillema. (2009) Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review 4:1, pages 41-54.
Crossref
Filip Dochy. 2009. Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education. Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education 1 30 .
Judith Gulikers, Dominique Sluijsmans, Liesbeth Baartman & Paul Bartolo. 2009. Becoming a Teacher Educator. Becoming a Teacher Educator 173 188 .
Barry A. Friedman, Pamela L. CoxLarry E. Maher. (2007) An Expectancy Theory Motivation Approach to Peer Assessment. Journal of Management Education 32:5, pages 580-612.
Crossref
Mien Segers, Rob Martens & Piet Van den Bossche. (2008) Understanding how a case-based assessment instrument influences student teachers’ learning approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education 24:7, pages 1751-1764.
Crossref
Judith T.M. Gulikers, Liesbeth Kester, Paul A. Kirschner & Theo J. Bastiaens. (2008) The effect of practical experience on perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approach, and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction 18:2, pages 172-186.
Crossref
Liesbeth K.J. Baartman, Theo J. Bastiaens, Paul A. Kirschner & Cees P.M. Van der Vleuten. (2007) Teachers’ opinions on quality criteria for Competency Assessment Programs. Teaching and Teacher Education 23:6, pages 857-867.
Crossref
Marjan J. B. Govaerts, Cees P. M. van der Vleuten, Lambert W. T. Schuwirth & Arno M. M. Muijtjens. (2006) Broadening Perspectives on Clinical Performance Assessment: Rethinking the Nature of In-training Assessment. Advances in Health Sciences Education 12:2, pages 239-260.
Crossref
Tracey Papinczak, Louise Young & Michele Groves. (2006) Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study. Advances in Health Sciences Education 12:2, pages 169-186.
Crossref
Liesbeth K.J. Baartman, Theo J. Bastiaens, Paul A. Kirschner & Cees P.M. van der Vleuten. (2007) Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review 2:2, pages 114-129.
Crossref
Kwangsu Cho & Bosung Kim. 2007. Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Applications and Services. Human-Computer Interaction. HCI Applications and Services 208 214 .
Rachel English, Sara T Brookes, Kerry Avery, Jane M Blazeby & Yoav Ben-Shlomo. (2006) The effectiveness and reliability of peer-marking in first-year medical students. Medical Education 40:10, pages 965-972.
Crossref
Gloria Dall’Alba & Jörgen Sandberg. (2016) Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models. Review of Educational Research 76:3, pages 383-412.
Crossref
Judith T.M. Gulikers, Theo J. Bastiaens, Paul A. Kirschner & Liesbeth Kester. (2006) RELATIONS BETWEEN STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF ASSESSMENT AUTHENTICITY, STUDY APPROACHES AND LEARNING OUTCOME. Studies in Educational Evaluation 32:4, pages 381-400.
Crossref
Paul Orsmond, Stephen Merry & David Sheffield. (2006) A quantitative and qualitative study of changes in the use of learning outcomes and distractions by students and tutors during a biology poster assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation 32:3, pages 262-287.
Crossref
Mien Segers, Jan Nijhuis & Wim Gijselaers. (2006) Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: The influence on students' perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation 32:3, pages 223-242.
Crossref
Liesbeth K.J. Baartman, Theo J. Bastiaens, Paul A Kirschner & Cees P.M. van der Vleuten. (2006) The wheel of competency assessment: Presenting quality criteria for competency assessment programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation 32:2, pages 153-170.
Crossref
Judith T. M. Gulikers, Theo J. Bastiaens & Paul A. Kirschner. (2004) A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development 52:3, pages 67-86.
Crossref
Janet Macdonald. (2003) Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product. Computers & Education 40:4, pages 377-391.
Crossref
Sarah Gielen, Filip Dochy & Sabine Dierick. 2003. Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards. Optimising New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards 37 54 .
Lisa E. Gueldenzoph & Gary L. May. (2016) Collaborative Peer Evaluation: Best Practices for Group Member Assessments. Business Communication Quarterly 65:1, pages 9-20.
Crossref
S.S.J. Lin, E.Z.F. Liu & S.M. Yuan. (2001) Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking‐styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17:4, pages 420-432.
Crossref
Keith Topping. (2016) Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research 68:3, pages 249-276.
Crossref
Kay Sambell, Liz McDowell & Sally Brown. (1997) “But is it fair?”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation 23:4, pages 349-371.
Crossref
Filip J.R.C. Dochy & Liz McDowell. (1997) Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation 23:4, pages 279-298.
Crossref
Martin Turner & Rachel F. Baskerville. (2011) Assessment and Intrinsic Motivation. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.