Citations (38)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (4)
A. Wendy Russell, Aleksandra Stelmach, Sarah Hartley, Lucy Carter & Sujatha Raman. (2022) Opening up, closing down, or leaving ajar? How applications are used in engaging with publics about gene drive. Journal of Responsible Innovation 9:2, pages 151-172.
Read now
Read now
Brian J. Burke, Meredith Welch-Devine, Seth Gustafson, Nik Heynen, Jennifer L. Rice, Ted L. Gragson, Sakura R. Evans & Donald R. Nelson. (2016) Can Science Writing Collectives Overcome Barriers to More Democratic Communication and Collaboration? Lessons from Environmental Communication Praxis in Southern Appalachia. Environmental Communication 10:2, pages 169-186.
Read now
Read now
Michiel van Oudheusden. (2014) Learning in, through, and about participatory technology assessment: the case of Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow's Society (NanoSoc). Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26:7, pages 825-836.
Read now
Read now
Rob Flynn, Miriam Ricci & Paul Bellaby. (2011) The Mirage of Citizen Engagement in Uncertain Science: Public attitudes towards hydrogen energy. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 1:2, pages 97-114.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (34)
Orlagh Reynolds, Aideen O'Dochartaigh, Enrico Secchi, Donna Marshall & Andrea Prothero. (2023)
Framing innovation success, failure, and transformation:
A
systematic literature review
. Journal of Product Innovation Management.
Crossref
Crossref
Katherine Nicole Canfield, Kate Mulvaney & Nathaniel Merrill. (2021) Messaging on Slow Impacts: Applying Lessons Learned from Climate Change Communication to Catalyze and Improve Marine Nutrient Communication. Frontiers in Environmental Science 9.
Crossref
Crossref
Clare Shelley-Egan, Diana M. Bowman & Douglas K. R. Robinson. (2017) Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies. Science and Engineering Ethics 24:6, pages 1719-1746.
Crossref
Crossref
Regula Valérie Burri. (2018) Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions. NanoEthics 12:2, pages 81-98.
Crossref
Crossref
Durwin Lynch, Frank Kupper & Jacqueline Broerse. (2018) Toward a Socially Desirable EU Research and Innovation Agenda on Urban Waste: A Transnational EU Citizen Consultation. Sustainability 10:5, pages 1641.
Crossref
Crossref
Lisa M. PytlikZillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Frank J. Gonzalez & Alan J. TomkinsLisa M. PytlikZillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Frank J. Gonzalez & Alan J. Tomkins. 2018. Deliberative Public Engagement with Science. Deliberative Public Engagement with Science
1
17
.
Jason Prior & Tapan Rai. (2017) Engaging with residents' perceived risks and benefits about technologies as a way of resolving remediation dilemmas. Science of The Total Environment 601-602, pages 1649-1669.
Crossref
Crossref
Yevgeniya Tomkiv, Astrid Liland, Deborah H. Oughton & Brian Wynne. (2019) Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement: From Bureaucracy to Democracy. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 37:3, pages 167-178.
Crossref
Crossref
. 2016. Nanotechnology in Nutraceuticals. Nanotechnology in Nutraceuticals
265
273
.
Robert G. Lee & Elen Stokes. 2016. Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw. Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw
237
252
.
Michael Yearworth & Sarah E. Cornell. (2016) Contested Modelling: a Critical Examination of Expert Modelling in Sustainability. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 33:1, pages 45-63.
Crossref
Crossref
Lotte Krabbenborg & Henk A. J. Mulder. (2015) Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology. Science Communication 37:4, pages 452-484.
Crossref
Crossref
Sally Dalton-BrownSally Dalton-Brown. 2015. Nanotechnology and Ethical Governance in the European Union and China. Nanotechnology and Ethical Governance in the European Union and China
11
41
.
Sally Dalton-BrownSally Dalton-Brown. 2015. Nanotechnology and Ethical Governance in the European Union and China. Nanotechnology and Ethical Governance in the European Union and China
1
9
.
A. Wendy Russell. (2013) Improving Legitimacy in Nanotechnology Policy Development Through Stakeholder and Community Engagement: Forging New Pathways. Review of Policy Research 30:5, pages 566-587.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert G. Lee & Judith Petts. 2013. Responsible Innovation. Responsible Innovation
143
164
.
Arie Rip & Harro van Lente. (2013) Bridging the Gap Between Innovation and ELSA: The TA Program in the Dutch Nano-R&D Program NanoNed. NanoEthics 7:1, pages 7-16.
Crossref
Crossref
Diana M. Bowman, Elen Stokes & Michael G. Bennett. (2013) Anticipating the Societal Challenges of Nanotechnologies. NanoEthics 7:1, pages 1-5.
Crossref
Crossref
S. E. Cornell & M. S. Jackson. 2013. Risk and Uncertainty Assessment for Natural Hazards. Risk and Uncertainty Assessment for Natural Hazards
502
547
.
Stephen H. Cutcliffe, Christine M. Pense & Michael Zvalaren. (2012) Framing the Discussion: Nanotechnology and the Social Construction of Technology--What STS Scholars Are Saying. NanoEthics 6:2, pages 81-99.
Crossref
Crossref
Sally Dalton-Brown. (2012) Global Ethics and Nanotechnology: A Comparison of the Nanoethics Environments of the EU and China. NanoEthics 6:2, pages 137-150.
Crossref
Crossref
Blanka Groboljsek & Franc Mali. (2011) Daily Newspapers’ Views on Nanotechnology in Slovenia. Science Communication 34:1, pages 30-56.
Crossref
Crossref
Natalia Maclurcan & Donald RadywylFern Wickson. 2011. Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability. Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability
217
240
.
Natalia Maclurcan & Donald RadywylDeb Bennett-Woods. 2011. Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability. Nanotechnology and Global Sustainability
157
174
.
Erik Fisher. (2011) Editorial Overview. Science and Engineering Ethics 17:4, pages 607-620.
Crossref
Crossref
Ismael Rafols, Patrick van Zwanenberg, Molly Morgan, Paul Nightingale & Adrian Smith. (2011) Missing links in nanomaterials governance: bringing industrial dynamics and downstream policies into view. The Journal of Technology Transfer 36:6, pages 624-639.
Crossref
Crossref
Ana Delgado, Kamilla Lein Kjølberg & Fern Wickson. (2010) Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science 20:6, pages 826-845.
Crossref
Crossref
Adam Corner & Alex Randall. (2011) Selling climate change? The limitations of social marketing as a strategy for climate change public engagement. Global Environmental Change 21:3, pages 1005-1014.
Crossref
Crossref
Anne Ingeborg Myhr & Bjørn K. Myskja. (2011) Precaution or Integrated Responsibility Approach to Nanovaccines in Fish Farming? A Critical Appraisal of the UNESCO Precautionary Principle. NanoEthics 5:1, pages 73-86.
Crossref
Crossref
David Demeritt. (2009) From externality to inputs and interference: framing environmental research in geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34:1, pages 3-11.
Crossref
Crossref
Risto Karinen & David H. Guston. 2010. Governing Future Technologies. Governing Future Technologies
217
232
.
Cyrus C. M. Mody. (2008) The larger world of nano. Physics Today 61:10, pages 38-44.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert Doubleday. (2007) The Laboratory Revisited. NanoEthics 1:2, pages 167-176.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert Doubleday. (2007) Organizing accountability: co-production of technoscientific and social worlds in a nanoscience laboratory. Area 39:2, pages 166-175.
Crossref
Crossref