383
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

Uncertain futures: Individual risk and social context in decision-making in cancer screening

Pages 101-117 | Received 30 Nov 2008, Accepted 27 Oct 2009, Published online: 26 Apr 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (7)

Marine Cécile Genton, Julien Carretier, Amiram Gafni, Patricia Medina, Cathy Charles & Nora Moumjid. (2019) ‘There’s a before and an after’: effects of a personal history of cancer on perception of cancer risks and adoption of behaviours. Health, Risk & Society 21:5-6, pages 246-267.
Read now
Mark Gaspar, Troy Grennan, Irving Salit & Daniel Grace. (2018) Confronting comorbidity risks within HIV biographies: gay men’s integration of HPV-associated anal cancer risk into their narratives of living with HIV. Health, Risk & Society 20:5-6, pages 276-296.
Read now
Anette Lykke Hindhede. (2014) Prediabetic categorisation: the making of a new person. Health, Risk & Society 16:7-8, pages 600-614.
Read now
Jennifer L. Hay, Raymond Baser, Neil D. Weinstein, Yuelin Li, Louis Primavera & M. Margaret Kemeny. (2014) Examining intuitive risk perceptions for cancer in diverse populations. Health, Risk & Society 16:3, pages 227-242.
Read now
Laura Glahder Lindberg, Mette Svendsen, Mikala Dømgaard & John Brodersen. (2013) Better safe than sorry: a long-term perspective on experiences with a false-positive screening mammography in Denmark. Health, Risk & Society 15:8, pages 699-716.
Read now
Gøril Thomassen & Srikant Sarangi. (2012) Evidence-based familial risk explanations in cancer genetic counselling. Health, Risk & Society 14:7-8, pages 607-626.
Read now
Bob Heyman. (2010) Screening for health risks: A second editorial. Health, Risk & Society 12:2, pages 81-84.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (16)

Emma Grundtvig Gram, Alexandra Brandt Ryborg Jønsson, John Brandt Brodersen & Christina Sadolin Damhus. (2023) Questioning ‘Informed Choice’ in Medical Screening: The Role of Neoliberal Rhetoric, Culture, and Social Context. Healthcare 11:9, pages 1230.
Crossref
Erika A. Waters, Jennifer M. Taber, Amy McQueen, Ashley J. Housten, Jamie L. Studts & Laura D. Scherer. (2020) Translating Cancer Risk Prediction Models into Personalized Cancer Risk Assessment Tools: Stumbling Blocks and Strategies for Success. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 29:12, pages 2389-2394.
Crossref
Evrosina I. Isaac, Andrea R. Meisman, Kirstin Drucker, Stephanie Violante, Kathryn L. Behrhorst, Alfonso Floyd & Jennifer M. Rohan. (2020) The Relationship between Health Disparities, Psychosocial Functioning and Health Outcomes in Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant Populations: Recommendations for Clinical Care. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17:7, pages 2218.
Crossref
Raymond E Baser, Yuelin Li, Debra Brennessel, M Margaret Kemeny & Jennifer L Hay. (2017) Measurement invariance of intuitive cancer risk perceptions across diverse populations: The Cognitive Causation and Negative Affect in Risk scales. Journal of Health Psychology 24:9, pages 1221-1232.
Crossref
Pia Kirkegaard, Adrian Edwards & Berit Andersen. (2019) A stitch in time saves nine: Perceptions about colorectal cancer screening after a non-cancer colonoscopy result. Qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling 102:7, pages 1373-1379.
Crossref
Anne Kerr, Emily Ross, Gwen Jacques & Sarah Cunningham-Burley. (2018) The sociology of cancer: a decade of research. Sociology of Health & Illness 40:3, pages 552-576.
Crossref
S. Michelle Driedger, Gary Annable, Melissa Brouwers, Donna Turner & Ryan Maier. (2017) Can you un-ring the bell? A qualitative study of how affect influences cancer screening decisions. BMC Cancer 17:1.
Crossref
Juliet McMullin. (2016) Cancer. Annual Review of Anthropology 45:1, pages 251-266.
Crossref
Jennifer L. Hay, Marcel Ramos, Yuelin Li, Susan Holland, Debra Brennessel & M. Margaret Kemeny. (2015) Deliberative and intuitive risk perceptions as predictors of colorectal cancer screening over time. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 39:1, pages 65-74.
Crossref
Joelle I. Rosser, Betty Njoroge & Megan J. Huchko. (2015) Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: The effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya. Patient Education and Counseling 98:7, pages 884-889.
Crossref
Qi Deng & Shaobo Ji. (2014) The Role of Gender in Individual and Group Decision Making: A Research Model. Open Journal of Social Sciences 02:03, pages 30-33.
Crossref
Candice Oster, Ian Zajac, Ingrid Flight, Elizabeth Hart, Graeme P. Young, Carlene Wilson & Deborah Turnbull. (2013) Ambivalence and Its Influence on Participation in Screening for Colorectal Cancer. Qualitative Health Research 23:9, pages 1188-1201.
Crossref
I. Milhabet, C. Duprez, A. Krzeminski & V. Christophe. (2013) Cancer risk comparative perception and overscreening behaviours of non-carriers from BRCA1/2 families. European Journal of Cancer Care 22:4, pages 540-548.
Crossref
Joël Vos, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Encarna Gomez-Garcia, Fred H. Menko, Margriet J. Collee, Christi J. van Asperen, Anna M. Jansen, Anne M. Stiggelbout & Aad Tibben. (2012) Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: The counselees’ perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. Patient Education and Counseling 86:2, pages 239-251.
Crossref
Joël Vos, Encarna Gómez‐García, Jan C. Oosterwijk, Fred H. Menko, Reinoud D. Stoel, Christi J. van Asperen, Anna M. Jansen, Anne M. Stiggelbout & Aad Tibben. (2010) Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2‐result. Psycho-Oncology 21:1, pages 29-42.
Crossref
Joël Vos, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Jan Oosterwijk, Encarna Gomez-Garcia, Fred Menko, J. Margriet Collee, Christi J. van Asperen & Aad Tibben. (2011) A counselee-oriented perspective on risk communication in genetic counseling: Explaining the inaccuracy of the counseleesʼ risk perception shortly after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure. Genetics in Medicine 13:9, pages 800-811.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.