Citations (54)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (7)
Veryan Patterson-Hann & Phillipa Watson. (2022) The precursors of acceptance for a prosumer-led transition to a future smart grid. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 34:3, pages 307-321.
Read now
Read now
Richard Koech, Rachel Cardell-Oliver & Geoff Syme. (2021) Smart water metering: adoption, regulatory and social considerations. Australasian Journal of Water Resources 25:2, pages 173-182.
Read now
Read now
M.B. (Bert) de Graaff & Christian Bröer. (2019) Governance and risk in everyday life: depoliticization and citizens' experiences of cell site deployment in the Netherlands and Southern California. Journal of Risk Research 22:12, pages 1586-1601.
Read now
Read now
Janos Sztipanovits, Xenofon Koutsoukos, Gabor Karsai, Shankar Sastry, Claire Tomlin, Werner Damm, Martin Fränzle, Jochem Rieger, Alexander Pretschner & Frank Köster. (2019) Science of design for societal-scale cyber-physical systems: challenges and opportunities. Cyber-Physical Systems 5:3, pages 145-172.
Read now
Read now
Meghan Elizabeth Kallman & Scott Frickel. (2019) Power to the people: industrial transition movements and energy populism. Environmental Sociology 5:3, pages 255-268.
Read now
Read now
M.B. de Graaff, C. Bröer & R.A. Wester. (2017) Biomedical risks and citizenship: depoliticizing cell site deployment in the Netherlands and Southern California. Journal of Risk Research 20:9, pages 1195-1210.
Read now
Read now
David J. Hess. (2015) Publics as Threats? Integrating Science and Technology Studies and Social Movement Studies. Science as Culture 24:1, pages 69-82.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (47)
Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu, Berfu Solak & Zehra Funda Savas. (2024) Unveiling resistance and opposition against low-carbon energy transitions: A comprehensive review. Energy Research & Social Science 107, pages 103354.
Crossref
Crossref
. 2024. Diffusion of Innovative Energy Services. Diffusion of Innovative Energy Services
207
224
.
Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska. 2024. Diffusion of Innovative Energy Services. Diffusion of Innovative Energy Services
107
163
.
Rosie Robison, Tomas Moe Skjølsvold, Tom Hargreaves, Sara Renström, Maarten Wolsink, Emily Judson, Viera Pechancová, Melike Demirbağ-Kaplan, Hug March, Johanna Lehne, Chris Foulds, Zareen Bharucha, Liliia Bilous, Christian Büscher, Giuseppe Carrus, Sarah Darby, Sylvie Douzou, Mojca Drevenšek, Bohumil Frantál, Ângela Guimarães Pereira, Andrew Karvonen, Cecilia Katzeff, Maria Kola-Bezka, Senja Laakso, Gudrun Lettmayer, Yael Parag, Fanni Sáfián, Mariusz Swora, Lise Tjørring, Ellen van der Werff, Bas van Vliet, Grégoire Wallenborn & Annemie Wyckmans. (2023) Shifts in the smart research agenda? 100 priority questions to accelerate sustainable energy futures. Journal of Cleaner Production 419, pages 137946.
Crossref
Crossref
Shary Heuninckx, Maarja Meitern, Geert te Boveldt & Thierry Coosemans. (2023) Practical problems before privacy concerns: How European energy community initiatives struggle with data collection. Energy Research & Social Science 98, pages 103040.
Crossref
Crossref
Jonathan Gumz & Diego Castro Fettermann. (2023) Better deployments come with acceptance: an investigation of factors driving consumers’ acceptance of smart meters. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports 10:2, pages 23-35.
Crossref
Crossref
Hao Li, Zhao-Hua Wang & Bin Zhang. (2023) How social interaction induce energy-saving behaviors in buildings: Interpersonal & passive interactions v.s. public & active interactions. Energy Economics 118, pages 106515.
Crossref
Crossref
Tanya Koohpayeh Araghi, David Megías & Andrea Rosales. 2023. Intelligent Computing. Intelligent Computing
651
667
.
Zhaohua Wang, Bin Lu, Bo Wang, Yueming (Lucy) Qiu, Jingyun Li & Bin Zhang. (2022) Field experimental evidence of how social relations shape behavior that promotes energy conservation. iScience, pages 105456.
Crossref
Crossref
Mónica Humeres. (2022) “Meters can be wonderful”: The relevance of democracy and technical aspects for user acceptance of smart meter policy in Chile. Energy Research & Social Science 90, pages 102613.
Crossref
Crossref
Kevin Chadwick, Rebekah Russell-Bennett & Nicholas Biddle. (2022) The role of human influences on adoption and rejection of energy technology: A systematised critical review of the literature on household energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 89, pages 102528.
Crossref
Crossref
Connor Smith, Julien Mouli-Castillo, Dan van der Horst, Stuart Haszeldine & Matthew Lane. (2022) Towards a 100% hydrogen domestic gas network: Regulatory and commercial barriers to the first demonstrator project in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47:55, pages 23071-23083.
Crossref
Crossref
Dasom Lee & David J. Hess. (2022) Public concerns and connected and automated vehicles: safety, privacy, and data security. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Frauke Schallehn & Konstantina Valogianni. (2022) Sustainability awareness and smart meter privacy concerns: The cases of US and Germany. Energy Policy 161, pages 112756.
Crossref
Crossref
David J. Hess. 2022. Knowledge and Civil Society. Knowledge and Civil Society
57
73
.
Justine Humphry & Chris Chesher. (2021) Visibility and security in the smart home. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 27:5, pages 1170-1188.
Crossref
Crossref
Aude Danieli. (2021) « Stop linky, non merci ». Réseaux N° 228:4, pages 233-266.
Crossref
Crossref
Dasom Lee & David J. Hess. (2021) Data privacy and residential smart meters: Comparative analysis and harmonization potential. Utilities Policy 70, pages 101188.
Crossref
Crossref
Carol Vigurs, Chris Maidment, Michael Fell & David Shipworth. (2021) Customer Privacy Concerns as a Barrier to Sharing Data about Energy Use in Smart Local Energy Systems: A Rapid Realist Review. Energies 14:5, pages 1285.
Crossref
Crossref
Dasom Lee, David J. Hess & Himanshu Neema. (2020) The challenges of implementing transactive energy: A comparative analysis of experimental projects. The Electricity Journal 33:10, pages 106865.
Crossref
Crossref
Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska, Katarzyna Byrka & Jakub Serek. (2020) How to Foster the Adoption of Electricity Smart Meters? A Longitudinal Field Study of Residential Consumers. Energies 13:18, pages 4737.
Crossref
Crossref
Yash Chawla, Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Paulo Duarte Silveira. (2020) Marketing and communications channels for diffusion of electricity smart meters in Portugal. Telematics and Informatics 50, pages 101385.
Crossref
Crossref
Yash Chawla, Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Burcu Oralhan. (2020) Attitudes and Opinions of Social Media Users Towards Smart Meters’ Rollout in Turkey. Energies 13:3, pages 732.
Crossref
Crossref
Tom Hargreaves & Lucie Middlemiss. (2020) The importance of social relations in shaping energy demand. Nature Energy 5:3, pages 195-201.
Crossref
Crossref
David J. Hess. 2020. Energy Justice Across Borders. Energy Justice Across Borders
23
44
.
Laura Draetta. (2018) The social construction of a health controversy. The case of electricity smart meters in France. Annals of Telecommunications 74:1-2, pages 5-15.
Crossref
Crossref
Laura Draetta & Bastien Tavner. (2019) De la « fronde anti-Linky » à la justification écologique du smart metering : retour sur la genèse d’un projet controversé. Lien social et Politiques:82, pages 52-77.
Crossref
Crossref
Benjamin K. Sovacool, Paula Kivimaa, Sabine Hielscher & Kirsten Jenkins. (2019) Further reflections on vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition. Energy Policy 124, pages 411-417.
Crossref
Crossref
Peter Connor & Oscar Fitch-Roy. 2019. Pathways to a Smarter Power System. Pathways to a Smarter Power System
397
413
.
David J. Hess. (2018) Social Movements and Energy Democracy: Types and Processes of Mobilization. Frontiers in Energy Research 6.
Crossref
Crossref
P.M. Connor, C.J. Axon, D. Xenias & N. Balta-Ozkan. (2018) Sources of risk and uncertainty in UK smart grid deployment: An expert stakeholder analysis. Energy 161, pages 1-9.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiaojing Xu, Chien-fei Chen, Xiaojuan Zhu & Qinran Hu. (2018) Promoting acceptance of direct load control programs in the United States: Financial incentive versus control option. Energy 147, pages 1278-1287.
Crossref
Crossref
Timo von Wirth, Linda Gislason & Roman Seidl. (2018) Distributed energy systems on a neighborhood scale: Reviewing drivers of and barriers to social acceptance. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, pages 2618-2628.
Crossref
Crossref
Derek Peters, Jonn Axsen & Alexandra Mallett. (2018) The role of environmental framing in socio-political acceptance of smart grid: The case of British Columbia, Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, pages 1939-1951.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Mallett, Jennie C. Stephens, Elizabeth J. Wilson, Ria Langheim, Ryan Reiber & Tarla Rai Peterson. (2018) Electric (dis) connections: Comparative review of smart grid news coverage in the United States and Canada. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, pages 1913-1921.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra Mallett, Maya Jegen, Xavier D. Philion, Ryan Reiber & Daniel Rosenbloom. (2018) Smart grid framing through coverage in the Canadian media: Technologies coupled with experiences. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82, pages 1952-1960.
Crossref
Crossref
Benjamin K. Sovacool, Paula Kivimaa, Sabine Hielscher & Kirsten Jenkins. (2017) Vulnerability and resistance in the United Kingdom's smart meter transition. Energy Policy 109, pages 767-781.
Crossref
Crossref
Maya Jegen & Xavier D. Philion. (2017) Power and smart meters: A political perspective on the social acceptance of energy projects. Canadian Public Administration 60:1, pages 68-88.
Crossref
Crossref
Sourya Joyee De & Daniel Le Metayer. (2016) Privacy Harm Analysis: A Case Study on Smart Grids. Privacy Harm Analysis: A Case Study on Smart Grids.
Daniela Spiesova & Dusan Maga. (2016) Socio-political view of smart grid implementation — A survey. Socio-political view of smart grid implementation — A survey.
Kaitlin T. Raimi & Amanda R. Carrico. (2016) Understanding and beliefs about smart energy technology. Energy Research & Social Science 12, pages 68-74.
Crossref
Crossref
Lucia Vesnic-Alujevic, Melina Breitegger & Ângela Guimarães Pereira. (2016) What smart grids tell about innovation narratives in the European Union: Hopes, imaginaries and policy. Energy Research & Social Science 12, pages 16-26.
Crossref
Crossref
Ellen van der Werff, Goda Perlaviciute & Linda Steg. 2016. Smart Grids from a Global Perspective. Smart Grids from a Global Perspective
43
62
.
Joeri Naus, Bas J.M. van Vliet & Astrid Hendriksen. (2015) Households as change agents in a Dutch smart energy transition: On power, privacy and participation. Energy Research & Social Science 9, pages 125-136.
Crossref
Crossref
Ingrid Foss Ballo. (2015) Imagining energy futures: Sociotechnical imaginaries of the future Smart Grid in Norway. Energy Research & Social Science 9, pages 9-20.
Crossref
Crossref
Jennie C. Stephens, Elizabeth J. Wilson & Tarla Rai Peterson. 2014. Smart Grid (R)Evolution. Smart Grid (R)Evolution
86
110
.
Nicole D. Sintov, Michael D. Orosz & P. Wesley Schultz. 2015. Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions. Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions
602
613
.