Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
Human Experimental Psychology
Volume 46, 1993 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
128
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An examination of the effects of axis foreshortening, monocular depth cues, and visual field on object identification

G. Keith Humphrey University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
&
Pierre Jolicoeur University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Pages 137-159 | Published online: 29 May 2007

Citations (41)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (5)

Orit Baruch, Ruth Kimchi & Morris Goldsmith. (2014) Attention to distinguishing features in object recognition. Visual Cognition 22:9-10, pages 1184-1215.
Read now
Bruno Laeng, Giovanni Augusto Carlesimo, Carlo Caltagirone & Gabriele Miceli. (2002) Rigid And Nonrigid Objects In Canonical And Noncanonical Views: Hemisphere-Specific Effects On Object Identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology 19:8, pages 697-720.
Read now
Hanna Chainay & Glyn W. Humphreys. (2001) The real-object advantage in agnosia: Evidence for a role of surface and depth information in object recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology 18:2, pages 175-191.
Read now
Rebecca Lawson. (1999) The Effects of View in Depth on the Identification of Line Drawings and Silhouettes of Familiar Objects: Normality and Pathology. Visual Cognition 6:2, pages 165-195.
Read now
Vicki Bruce & GlynW. Humphreys. (1994) Recognizing objects and faces. Visual Cognition 1:2-3, pages 141-180.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (36)

Giacomo Aldegheri, Surya Gayet & Marius V. Peelen. (2023) Scene context automatically drives predictions of object transformations. Cognition 238, pages 105521.
Crossref
Vladislav Ayzenberg & Marlene Behrmann. (2022) Does the brain's ventral visual pathway compute object shape?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 26:12, pages 1119-1132.
Crossref
İrfan KUNDUZ, Atakan DURMAZ, Özlem ALBAYRAK, Tilbe ALP, Perin ÜNAL & Mert ANKARALI. (2022) Sensörsüz Seri Elastik Tekniği ile Bir Kablo Sürümlü Düzlemsel Mekanizmanın KontrolüSensorless Series Elastic Control of a Cable-Driven Planar Mechanism. European Journal of Science and Technology.
Crossref
M. Ras, M. Wyrwa, J. Stachowiak, M. Buchwald, A. M. Nowik & G. Kroliczak. (2022) Complex tools and motor-to-mechanical transformations. Scientific Reports 12:1.
Crossref
Kazushi MARUYA & Tomoko OHTANI. (2020) Interpretations of the Cafe-wall Illusion on the Basis of 3D Scene Perception and Production of Variationsカフェウォール錯視の三次元的解釈と錯視パターンのバリエーション. Journal of Graphic Science of Japan 54:1, pages 13.
Crossref
Miri Besken, Elif Cemre Solmaz, Meltem Karaca & Nilsu Atılgan. (2019) Not all perceptual difficulties lower memory predictions: Testing the perceptual fluency hypothesis with rotated and inverted object images. Memory & Cognition 47:5, pages 906-922.
Crossref
Vladislav Ayzenberg, Yunxiao Chen, Sami R. Yousif & Stella F. Lourenco. (2019) Skeletal representations of shape in human vision: Evidence for a pruned medial axis model. Journal of Vision 19:6, pages 6.
Crossref
Kohei Nonose, Ryosuke Niimi & Kazuhiko Yokosawa. (2015) On the three-quarter view advantage of familiar object recognition. Psychological Research 80:6, pages 1030-1048.
Crossref
R. B. Fisher, T. P. Breckon, K. Dawson‐Howe, A. Fitzgibbon, C. Robertson, E. Trucco & C. K. I. Williams. 2016. Dictionary of Computer Vision and Image Processing. Dictionary of Computer Vision and Image Processing 324 372 .
Gergo Sastyin, Ryosuke Niimi & Kazuhiko Yokosawa. (2014) Does object view influence the scene consistency effect?. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77:3, pages 856-866.
Crossref
M. A. Butavicius, K. M. Parsons, A. McCormac, R. Foster, A. Whittenbury & V. MacLeod. 2011. Innovations in Defence Support Systems -2. Innovations in Defence Support Systems -2 183 206 .
Scott JohnsonLinda B. Smith & Alfredo F. Pereira. 2009. Neoconstructivism. Neoconstructivism 109 131 .
Benjamin J. Balas & Pawan Sinha. (2009) The role of sequence order in determining view canonicality for novel wire-frame objects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71:4, pages 712-723.
Crossref
Ryosuke Niimi & Kazuhiko Yokosawa. (2009) Three-quarter views are subjectively good because object orientation is uncertain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16:2, pages 289-294.
Crossref
Ryosuke Niimi & Kazuhiko Yokosawa. (2009) Viewpoint Dependence in the Recognition of Non-Elongated Familiar Objects: Testing the Effects of Symmetry, Front-Back Axis, and Familiarity. Perception 38:4, pages 533-551.
Crossref
Matt Craddock & Rebecca Lawson. (2008) Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects. Perception & Psychophysics 70:7, pages 1350-1365.
Crossref
Rebecca Lawson & Heinrich H. Bülthoff. (2006) Comparing view sensitivity in shape discrimination with shape sensitivity in view discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 68:4, pages 655-673.
Crossref
Grzegorz Króliczak, Melvyn A Goodale & G Keith Humphrey. (2016) The Effects of Different Aperture-Viewing Conditions on the Recognition of Novel Objects. Perception 32:10, pages 1169-1179.
Crossref
Bruno Laeng, Amir Zarrinpar & Stephen M. Kosslyn. (2003) Do separate processes identify objects as exemplars versus members of basic-level categories? Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Brain and Cognition 53:1, pages 15-27.
Crossref
Hidemichi Mitsumatsu & Kazuhiko Yokosawa. (2016) Efficient Extrapolation of the View with a Dynamic and Predictive Stimulus. Perception 32:8, pages 969-983.
Crossref
Hidemichi Mitsumatsu & Kazuhiko Yokosawa. (2016) How do the Internal Details of the Object Contribute to Recognition?. Perception 31:11, pages 1289-1298.
Crossref
Todd M. Eischeid & Mark W. Scerbo. (2016) Perceptual Cues and Subjective Organization in a Virtual Information Workspace. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 46:5, pages 670-674.
Crossref
Karen G Nicholson & G Keith Humphrey. (2016) Surface Cues Reduce the Latency to Name Rotated Images of Objects. Perception 30:9, pages 1057-1081.
Crossref
Mark St. John, Michael B. Cowen, Harvey S. Smallman & Heather M. Oonk. (2016) The Use of 2D and 3D Displays for Shape-Understanding versus Relative-Position Tasks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43:1, pages 79-98.
Crossref
László Séra. (2001) A tárgykonstancia és neuropszichológiai vizsgálatai. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 55:4, pages 389-402.
Crossref
Andrew Found, Hermann J M?ller & Birkbeck College. (2016) Efficient Search for Size Targets on a Background Texture Gradient: Is Detection Guided by Discontinuities in the Retinal-Size Gradient of Items?. Perception 30:1, pages 21-48.
Crossref
E. Darcy Burgund & Chad J. Marsolek. (2000) Viewpoint-invariant and viewpoint-dependent object recognition in dissociable neural subsystems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7:3, pages 480-489.
Crossref
Karin L. Harman, G.Keith Humphrey & Melvyn A. Goodale. (1999) Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology 9:22, pages 1315-1318.
Crossref
Zoe Kourtzi & Maggie Shiffrar. (1999) The visual representation of three-dimensional, rotating objects. Acta Psychologica 102:2-3, pages 265-292.
Crossref
Rebecca Lawson. (1999) Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica 102:2-3, pages 221-245.
Crossref
Karin L Harman & G Keith Humphrey. (2016) Encoding ?Regular? and ?Random? Sequences of Views of Novel Three-Dimensional Objects. Perception 28:5, pages 601-615.
Crossref
Rebecca Lawson & Glyn W. Humphreys. (1998) View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Perception & Psychophysics 60:6, pages 1052-1066.
Crossref
Fiona N Newell & John M Findlay. (2016) The Effect of Depth Rotation on Object Identification. Perception 26:10, pages 1231-1257.
Crossref
Michael J. Tarr. (1995) Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2:1, pages 55-82.
Crossref
Karl Verfaillie & Luc Boutsen. (1995) A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects. Perception & Psychophysics 57:7, pages 925-961.
Crossref
G. Keith Humphrey & Stephen J. Lupker. (1993) Codes and operations in picture matching. Psychological Research 55:3, pages 237-247.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.