Citations (46)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (16)
Yen-Fen Lee, Chi-Jen Lin, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Qing-Ke Fu & Weu-Hui Tseng. (2023) Effects of a mobile-based progressive peer-feedback scaffolding strategy on students’ creative thinking performance, metacognitive awareness, and learning attitude. Interactive Learning Environments 31:5, pages 2986-3002.
Read now
Read now
Stephen A. Coetzee, Astrid Schmulian & Cecile Janse van Rensburg. (2023) The use of mobile instant messaging for peer feedback in online assessments for learning. Accounting Education 0:0, pages 1-15.
Read now
Read now
Keith James Topping. (2023) Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: a systematic review. Research Papers in Education 38:3, pages 472-498.
Read now
Read now
Katherine Goldie, Rachael Ironside & Elliot Pirie. (2023) “It feels real”: Events management and online experiential learning in COVID-19. Distance Education 44:2, pages 230-245.
Read now
Read now
Saeed Latifi, Omid Noroozi & Ebrahim Talaee. (2023) Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interactive Learning Environments 31:2, pages 655-669.
Read now
Read now
Ji-Ping Jiang, Jin-Yan Hu, Yi-Bing Zhang & Xiao-Cui Yin. (2022) Fostering college students’ critical thinking skills through peer assessment in the knowledge building community. Interactive Learning Environments 0:0, pages 1-17.
Read now
Read now
Naomi Winstone, David Boud, Phillip Dawson & Marion Heron. (2022) From feedback-as-information to feedback-as-process: a linguistic analysis of the feedback literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:2, pages 213-230.
Read now
Read now
Hongli Li, Jacquelyn A. Bialo, Yao Xiong, Charles Vincent Hunter & Xiuyan Guo. (2021) The Effect of Peer Assessment on Non-Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Applied Measurement in Education 34:3, pages 179-203.
Read now
Read now
Saeed Latifi, Omid Noroozi, Javad Hatami & Harm J.A. Biemans. (2021) How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning?. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 58:2, pages 195-206.
Read now
Read now
Mengqian Wang, Wenge Guo, Huixiao Le & Bo Qiao. (2020) Reply to which post? An analysis of peer reviews in a high school SPOC. Interactive Learning Environments 28:5, pages 574-585.
Read now
Read now
Zhiqiang Ma, Xuejing Yan & Qiyun Wang. (2020) Assessing individual contribution in collaborative learning through self- and peer-assessment in the context of China. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 57:3, pages 352-363.
Read now
Read now
Jin Liu, Xiuyan Guo, Ruiqin Gao, Paul Fram, Yu Ling, He Zhang & Jin Wang. (2019) Students’ learning outcomes and peer rating accuracy in compulsory and voluntary online peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:6, pages 835-847.
Read now
Read now
Zehra Altınay. (2017) Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology 36:3, pages 312-320.
Read now
Read now
Hongli Li, Yao Xiong, Xiaojiao Zang, Mindy L. Kornhaber, Youngsun Lyu, Kyung Sun Chung & Hoi K. Suen. (2016) Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:2, pages 245-264.
Read now
Read now
Kun-Hung Cheng & Huei-Tse Hou. (2015) Exploring students’ behavioural patterns during online peer assessment from the affective, cognitive, and metacognitive perspectives: a progressive sequential analysis. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 24:2, pages 171-188.
Read now
Read now
Mark A. Earley. (2014) A synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education 19:3, pages 242-253.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (30)
Yuru Lin, Yi Zhang, Yuqin Yang, Yijie Lu, Pinghong Zhou & Yichi Wang. (2023) “Free selection and invitation” online peer assessment of undergraduates’ research competencies, flow, motivation and interaction in a research methods course. Journal of Computing in Higher Education.
Crossref
Crossref
Colin William Campbell & Barney Batista. (2023) To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open 4, pages 100218.
Crossref
Crossref
Alejandra Recio-Saucedo, Ksenia Crane, Katie Meadmore, Kathryn Fackrell, Hazel Church, Simon Fraser & Amanda Blatch-Jones. (2022) What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis. Research Integrity and Peer Review 7:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Yu Peng, Yanyan Li, You Su, Kailiang Chen & Shiyan Jiang. (2022) Effects of group awareness tools on students' engagement, performance, and perceptions in online collaborative writing: Intergroup information matters. The Internet and Higher Education 53, pages 100845.
Crossref
Crossref
Afsheen Rezai. (2022) Cultivating Iranian IELTS Candidates’ Writing Skills through Online Peer Feedback: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry. Education Research International 2022, pages 1-12.
Crossref
Crossref
Kathryn Fackrell, Katie Meadmore, Alejandra Recio-Saucedo, Abby Bull, Simon Fraser & Amanda Blatch-Jones. (2021) Identification and comparison of key criteria of feedback of funding decisions: mixed-methods analysis of funder and applicant perspectives. BMJ Open 11:9, pages e048979.
Crossref
Crossref
Yolanda Agudo-Arroyo & Javier Callejo-Gallego. (2021) Evaluating Assessment in MOOCs. Magis, Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación 14, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Crossref
Soon Yen Foo. (2021) Analysing peer feedback in asynchronous online discussions: A case study. Education and Information Technologies 26:4, pages 4553-4572.
Crossref
Crossref
Ahmet Oğuz AKÇAY, Ufuk GÜVEN & Engin KARAHAN. (2021) The Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer AssessmentThe Views of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers About Online and Traditional Peer Assessment. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 8:2, pages 409-422.
Crossref
Crossref
Jingchun Chen. (2021) The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in EFL Blended Learning Environments. The Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in EFL Blended Learning Environments.
Elisabeth Eppler, Jan Meyer, Steffen Serowy, Karl Link, Barbara Pauk & Luis Filgueira. (2018) Enhancing Scientific Communication Skills: a Real-World Simulation in a Tertiary-Level Life Science Class Using E-Learning Technology in Biomedical Literature Perception, Reflective Review Writing on a Clinical Issue, and Self and Peer Assessments. Research in Science Education 51:2, pages 277-299.
Crossref
Crossref
Ahlam Mohammed Al-Abdullatif. (2020) Alternative Assessment Approaches and Quality Product Design Within Web-Based Learning Environments. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies 15:3, pages 60-74.
Crossref
Crossref
I-Ching Chen, Gwo-Jen Hwang, Chiu-Lin Lai & Wei-Chun Wang. (2020) From design to reflection: Effects of peer-scoring and comments on students’ behavioral patterns and learning outcomes in musical theater performance. Computers & Education 150, pages 103856.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiongyi Liu, Lan Li & Patrick Wachira. 2020. Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education. Handbook of Research on Literacy and Digital Technology Integration in Teacher Education
245
260
.
Fon-Chu Kuo, Jun-Ming Chen, Hui-Chun Chu, Kai-Hsiang Yang & Yi-Hsuan Chen. 2020. Learning and Performance Assessment. Learning and Performance Assessment
745
759
.
Calvin C. Y. Liao, Yuhuan Li & Hercy N. H. Cheng. (2019) Examining the Effects of Automatic Comment Classification on Comment Types in Peer Review for Graduate Students' Academic Writing. Examining the Effects of Automatic Comment Classification on Comment Types in Peer Review for Graduate Students' Academic Writing.
Guan-Yu Lin. (2018) Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system. Computers & Education 116, pages 81-92.
Crossref
Crossref
Lanqin ZhengLanqin Zheng. 2017. Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
129
144
.
Omid Noroozi, Harm Biemans & Martin Mulder. (2016) Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. The Internet and Higher Education 31, pages 20-31.
Crossref
Crossref
Chun-Ying Huang & Iwen Huang. (2016) Effects of Online Peer Feedback on Dancers at Different Levels. Effects of Online Peer Feedback on Dancers at Different Levels.
M. Gielen & B. De Wever. (2015) Structuring the peer assessment process: a multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement and peer feedback quality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31:5, pages 435-449.
Crossref
Crossref
Mario Gielen & Bram De Wever. (2015) Scripting the role of assessor and assessee in peer assessment in a wiki environment: Impact on peer feedback quality and product improvement. Computers & Education 88, pages 370-386.
Crossref
Crossref
Kun-Hung Cheng, Jyh-Chong Liang & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2015) Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education 25, pages 78-84.
Crossref
Crossref
Yasemin Demiraslan Çevik, Tülin Haşlaman & Serkan Çelik. (2015) The effect of peer assessment on problem solving skills of prospective teachers supported by online learning activities. Studies in Educational Evaluation 44, pages 23-35.
Crossref
Crossref
Kok Chin Chai & Kai Meng Tay. (2014) A perceptual computing-based approach for peer assessment. A perceptual computing-based approach for peer assessment.
YING-CHIH CHEN, BRIAN HAND & LEAH McDOWELL. (2013) The Effects of Writing-to-Learn Activities on Elementary Students’ Conceptual Understanding: Learning About Force and Motion Through Writing to Older Peers. Science Education 97:5, pages 745-771.
Crossref
Crossref
Jingyan Lu & Nancy Law. (2011) Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science 40:2, pages 257-275.
Crossref
Crossref
Shu-Hsuan Chang, Mei-Ling Chen, Yen-Kuang Kuo & Yung-Chi Shen. (2011) A Simulation-Based LED Design Project in Photonics Instruction Based on Industry–University Collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Education 54:4, pages 582-589.
Crossref
Crossref
Jyh-Chong Liang & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2010) Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course. The Internet and Higher Education 13:4, pages 242-247.
Crossref
Crossref
Ioannis Giannoukos, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Giorgos Mpardis, Vassilis Nikolopoulos, Vassili Loumos & Eleftherios Kayafas. 2010. Semantics in Adaptive and Personalized Services. Semantics in Adaptive and Personalized Services
109
126
.