Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Volume 16, 2016 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
256
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The use of non-economic criteria in pricing and reimbursement decisions in Central and Eastern Europe: issues, trends and recommendations

Katarzyna KolasaDepartment of Public Health, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, PolandCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Zoltan KaloDepartment of Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary;Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, HungaryView further author information
&
Vladimir ZahHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, ZRx Outcomes Research Inc, Toronto, CanadaView further author information
Pages 483-488 | Received 28 Apr 2016, Accepted 19 Jul 2016, Published online: 12 Aug 2016

Citations (3)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (1)

András Inotai, Huong Thanh Nguyen, Budi Hidayat, Talgat Nurgozhin, Pham Huy Tuan Kiet, Jonathan D. Campbell, Bertalan Németh, Nikos Maniadakis, Diana Brixner, Kalman Wijaya & Zoltán Kaló. (2018) Guidance toward the implementation of multicriteria decision analysis framework in developing countries. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research 18:6, pages 585-592.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (2)

Mónica D. Oliveira, Inês Mataloto & Panos Kanavos. (2019) Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art. The European Journal of Health Economics 20:6, pages 891-918.
Crossref
Marcell Csanádi, Olga Löblová, Piotr Ozierański, András Harsányi, Zoltán Kaló, Martin McKee & Lawrence King. (2018) When health technology assessment is confidential and experts have no power: the case of Hungary. Health Economics, Policy and Law 14:2, pages 162-181.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.