627
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Decision outcomes in women offered noninvasive prenatal test (NIPT) for positive Down screening results

, , , , , & show all
Pages 348-350 | Received 31 Mar 2017, Accepted 07 Sep 2017, Published online: 19 Sep 2017

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

Jia-Ming Xiang & Ling-Ling Gao. (2023) Decisional conflict, anxiety, and social support among Chinese pregnant women making further prenatal testing decisions. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 0:0, pages 1-13.
Read now
Hilary Bowman-Smart, Christopher Gyngell, Cara Mand, David J. Amor, Martin B. Delatycki & Julian Savulescu. (2023) Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for “Non-Medical” Traits: Ensuring Consistency in Ethical Decision-Making. The American Journal of Bioethics 23:3, pages 3-20.
Read now
Jia-Ming Xiang, Ke Sun, Qian Zhao, Han-Bing Li & Ling-Ling Gao. (2022) Psychometric Assessment of the Mandarin Version of the Decisional Conflict Scale with Pregnant Women Making Prenatal Test Decisions. Patient Preference and Adherence 16, pages 149-158.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (12)

Thomas Liehr. (2022) False-positives and false-negatives in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): what can we learn from a meta-analyses on > 750,000 tests?. Molecular Cytogenetics 15:1.
Crossref
Molly Fox. (2022) How demographics and concerns about the Trump administration relate to prenatal mental health among Latina women. Social Science & Medicine 307, pages 115171.
Crossref
İlknur Yeşilçinar, Memnun Seven, Şeyma İnciser Paşalak & Gülten Güvenç. (2021) Interventions aiming to improve informed decision on prenatal screening and testing: A scoping review of the literature. Journal of Genetic Counseling 30:6, pages 1512-1521.
Crossref
Lin Yu, Shu Yang, Chunmiao Zhang, Pingping Guo, Xuehui Zhang, Mengmeng Xu, Qi Tian, Xuan Cui & Wei Zhang. (2021) Decision aids for prenatal testing: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 77:10, pages 3964-3979.
Crossref
Tatsuko Hirose, Nahoko Shirato, Mikiko Izumi, Keiko Miyagami & Akihiko Sekizawa. (2020) Postpartum questionnaire survey of women who tested negative in a non-invasive prenatal testing: examining negative emotions towards the test. Journal of Human Genetics 66:6, pages 579-584.
Crossref
Medhat Sabry Alberry, Ehab Aziz, Sawssan R. Ahmed & Sherif Abdel-fattah. (2021) Non invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for common aneuploidies and beyond. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 258, pages 424-429.
Crossref
Valentina Di Mattei, Federica Ferrari, Gaia Perego, Valentina Tobia, Fabio Mauro & Massimo Candiani. (2021) Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review. Health Psychology Open 8:1, pages 205510292098745.
Crossref
Junko Yotsumoto, Akihiko Sekizawa, Satomi Inoue, Nobuhiro Suzumori, Osamu Samura, Takahiro Yamada, Kiyonori Miura, Hideaki Masuzaki, Hideaki Sawai, Jun Murotsuki, Haruka Hamanoue, Yoshimasa Kamei, Toshiaki Endo, Akimune Fukushima, Yukiko Katagiri, Naoki Takeshita, Masaki Ogawa, Haruki Nishizawa, Yoko Okamoto, Shinya Tairaku, Takashi Kaji, Kazuhisa Maeda, Keiichi Matsubara, Masanobu Ogawa, Hisao Osada, Takashi Ohba, Yukie Kawano, Aiko Sasaki & Haruhiko Sago. (2020) Qualitative investigation of the factors that generate ambivalent feelings in women who give birth after receiving negative results from non-invasive prenatal testing. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 20:1.
Crossref
An Chen, Henni Tenhunen, Paulus Torkki, Seppo Heinonen, Paul Lillrank & Vedran Stefanovic. (2020) Women’s decisional conflict in the pathway of prenatal screening and testing: an explorative study within Finnish public maternity care. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 48:6, pages 527-537.
Crossref
Valérie Labonté, Dima Alsaid, Britta Lang & Joerg J. Meerpohl. (2019) Psychological and social consequences of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a scoping review. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 19:1.
Crossref
Tanja Schlaikjær Hartwig, Caroline Borregaard Miltoft, Charlotta Ingvoldstad Malmgren, Ann Tabor & Finn Stener Jørgensen. (2019) High risk—What's next? A survey study on decisional conflict, regret, and satisfaction among high‐risk pregnant women making choices about further prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Prenatal Diagnosis 39:8, pages 635-642.
Crossref
Barbara B. Biesecker. (2019) The Psychological Well-being of Pregnant Women Undergoing Prenatal Testing and Screening: A Narrative Literature Review . Hastings Center Report 49, pages S53-S60.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.