Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 44, 2005 - Issue 11
Submit an article Journal homepage
163
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The preferred response slopes and two-channel compression ratios in twenty listening conditions by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners and their relationship to the acoustic input

La pendiente preferida de respuesta y las relaciones de compresión en dos canales en veinte condiciones de escucha con hipoacúsicos y en sujetos normales y su relación con el ingreso acústico

Gitte Keidser National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Chris Brew National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, Australia
,
Scott Brewer National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, Australia
,
Harvey Dillon National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, Australia
,
Frances Grant National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, Australia
&
Lydia Storey National Acoustic Laboratories, Chatswood, Australia
Pages 656-670 | Received 03 Dec 2003, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

Citations (22)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (4)

Jonathan Albert Gößwein, Jan Rennies, Rainer Huber, Tobias Bruns, Andrea Hildebrandt & Birger Kollmeier. (2023) Evaluation of a semi-supervised self-adjustment fine-tuning procedure for hearing aids. International Journal of Audiology 62:2, pages 159-171.
Read now
James M. Kates. (2010) Understanding compression: Modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids. International Journal of Audiology 49:6, pages 395-409.
Read now
Gitte Keidser, Anna O'Brien, Lyndal Carter, Margot McLelland & Ingrid Yeend. (2008) Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology 47:10, pages 621-635.
Read now
Gitte Keidser, Lyndal Carter, Josef Chalupper & Harvey Dillon. (2007) Effect of low-frequency gain and venting effects on the benefit derived from directionality and noise reduction in hearing aids. International Journal of Audiology 46:10, pages 554-568.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (18)

Ibrahim Almufarrij, Harvey Dillon, Benjamin Adams, Aneela Greval & Kevin J Munro. (2023) Listening Preferences of New Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Registered, Double-Blind, Randomized, Mixed-Methods Clinical Trial of Initial Versus Real-Ear Fit. Trends in Hearing 27.
Crossref
Trevor T. Perry & Peggy B. Nelson. (2022) Self-Adjustment of Hearing Aid Amplification for Lower Speech Levels: Independent Ratings, Paired Comparisons, and Speech Recognition. American Journal of Audiology 31:2, pages 305-321.
Crossref
Sara Akbarzadeh, Edward Lobarinas & Nasser Kehtarnavaz. (2022) Online Personalization of Compression in Hearing Aids via Maximum Likelihood Inverse Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Access 10, pages 58537-58546.
Crossref
Raul Sanchez-Lopez, Michal Fereczkowski, Sébastien Santurette, Torsten Dau & Tobias Neher. (2021) Towards Auditory Profile-Based Hearing-Aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation. Audiology Research 11:1, pages 10-21.
Crossref
Els Walravens, Gitte Keidser & Louise Hickson. (2020) Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids. Trends in Hearing 24, pages 233121652093339.
Crossref
Gitte Keidser, Nicole Matthews & Elizabeth Convery. (2019) A Qualitative Examination of User Perceptions of User-Driven and App-Controlled Hearing Technologies. American Journal of Audiology 28:4, pages 993-1005.
Crossref
Niels Søgaard Jensen, Ole Hau, Jens Brehm Bagger Nielsen, Thor Bundgaard Nielsen & Søren Vase Legarth. (2019) Perceptual Effects of Adjusting Hearing-Aid Gain by Means of a Machine-Learning Approach Based on Individual User Preference. Trends in Hearing 23, pages 233121651984741.
Crossref
Trevor T. Perry, Peggy B. Nelson & Dianne J. Van Tasell. (2019) Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain. Trends in Hearing 23, pages 233121651983712.
Crossref
Carol Mackersie, Arthur BoothroydAlexandra Lithgow. (2019) A “Goldilocks” Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index. Ear & Hearing 40:1, pages 107-115.
Crossref
Maciej Jan Korzepa, Benjamin Johansen, Michael Kai Petersen, Jan Larsen, Jakob Eg Larsen & Niels Henrik Pontoppidan. (2018) Modeling User Intents as Context in Smartphone-connected Hearing Aids. Modeling User Intents as Context in Smartphone-connected Hearing Aids.
Peggy B. Nelson, Trevor T. Perry, Melanie Gregan & Dianne VanTasell. (2018) Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large Between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651879826.
Crossref
Gitte Keidser, Harvey Dillon, Lyndal Carter & Anna O’Brien. (2012) NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments. Trends in Amplification 16:4, pages 211-223.
Crossref
Lena L. N. Wong. (2012) Evidence on Self-Fitting Hearing Aids. Trends in Amplification 15:4, pages 215-225.
Crossref
Andrew T. Sabin, Lauren Hardies, Nicole Marrone & Sumitrajit Dhar. (2011) Weighting Function-Based Mapping of Descriptors to Frequency-Gain Curves in Listeners With Hearing Loss. Ear & Hearing 32:3, pages 399-409.
Crossref
Luc Lamarche, Christian Giguère, Wail Gueaieb, Tyseer Aboulnasr & Hisham Othman. (2010) Adaptive environment classification system for hearing aids. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127:5, pages 3124-3135.
Crossref
Gitte Keidser, David Hartley & Lyndal Carter. (2008) Long-Term Usage of Modern Signal Processing by Listeners With Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Survey. American Journal of Audiology 17:2, pages 136-146.
Crossref
Gitte Keidser, Harvey Dillon & Elizabeth Convery. (2008) The effect of the base line response on self-adjustments of hearing aid gain. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124:3, pages 1668-1681.
Crossref
Wouter A. Dreschler, Gitte Keidser, Elizabeth Convery & Harvey Dillon. (2008) Client-Based Adjustments of Hearing Aid Gain: The Effect of Different Control Configurations. Ear & Hearing 29:2, pages 214-227.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.