776
Views
90
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit

Adaptación de auxiliares auditivos lineales y no lineales – 1. Patrones de beneficio

, &
Pages 130-152 | Received 06 Jan 2005, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (18)

Hasan. K. Saleh, Paula Folkeard, Selina Liao & Susan Scollie. (2023) Development and initial evaluation of the Hearing Aid Attribute and Feature Importance Evaluation (HAFIE) questionnaire. International Journal of Audiology 0:0, pages 1-10.
Read now
Erik J. Jorgensen, Elizabeth Stangl, Octav Chipara, Helin Hernandez, Jacob Oleson & Yu-Hsiang Wu. (2021) GPS predicts stability of listening environment characteristics in one location over time among older hearing aid users. International Journal of Audiology 60:5, pages 328-340.
Read now
Varsha H. Rallapalli & Joshua M. Alexander. (2019) Effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition with variants of a multichannel adaptive dynamic range compression scheme. International Journal of Audiology 58:10, pages 661-669.
Read now
Jerker Rönnberg, Emil Holmer & Mary Rudner. (2019) Cognitive hearing science and ease of language understanding. International Journal of Audiology 58:5, pages 247-261.
Read now
Afzarini H. Ismail, Kevin J. Munro, Christopher J. Armitage & Piers D. Dawes. (2019) What do hearing healthcare professionals do to promote hearing aid use and benefit among adults? A systematic review. International Journal of Audiology 58:2, pages 63-76.
Read now
Steffen Kortlang, Zhangli Chen, Timo Gerkmann, Birger Kollmeier, Volker Hohmann & Stephan D. Ewert. (2018) Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications. International Journal of Audiology 57:sup3, pages S43-S54.
Read now
Tim Jürgens, Nicholas R. Clark, Wendy Lecluyse & Ray Meddis. (2016) Exploration of a physiologically-inspired hearing-aid algorithm using a computer model mimicking impaired hearing. International Journal of Audiology 55:6, pages 346-357.
Read now
Eline Borch Petersen, Thomas Lunner, Martin D. Vestergaard & Elisabet Sundewall Thorén. (2016) Danish reading span data from 283 hearing-aid users, including a sub-group analysis of their relationship to speech-in-noise performance. International Journal of Audiology 55:4, pages 254-261.
Read now
Brian Gygi & Deborah Ann Hall. (2016) Background sounds and hearing-aid users: A scoping review. International Journal of Audiology 55:1, pages 1-10.
Read now
Rachel J. Ellis & Kevin J. Munro. (2015) Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology 54:1, pages 37-47.
Read now
Søren Laugesen, Niels Søgaard Jensen, Patrick Maas & Claus Nielsen. (2011) Own voice qualities (OVQ) in hearing-aid users: There is more than just occlusion. International Journal of Audiology 50:4, pages 226-236.
Read now
James M. Kates. (2010) Understanding compression: Modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids. International Journal of Audiology 49:6, pages 395-409.
Read now
Danielle Glista, Susan Scollie, Marlene Bagatto, Richard Seewald, Vijay Parsa & Andrew Johnson. (2009) Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: Clinical outcomes. International Journal of Audiology 48:9, pages 632-644.
Read now
Patrick J. Boyle, Andreas Büchner, Michael A. Stone, Thomas Lenarz & Brian C.J. Moore. (2009) Comparison of dual-time-constant and fast-acting automatic gain control (AGC) systems in cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology 48:4, pages 211-221.
Read now
Gaëtan Gilbert, Michael A. Akeroyd & Stuart Gatehouse. (2008) Discrimination of release time constants in hearing-aid compressors. International Journal of Audiology 47:4, pages 189-198.
Read now
Stuart Gatehouse, Graham Naylor & Claus Elberling. (2006) Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 2. Patterns of candidature. International Journal of Audiology 45:3, pages 153-171.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (72)

Ilze Oosthuizen, Lakshmi Magudilu Srishyla Kumar, Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha, De Wet Swanepoel, Sarah Granberg, Elin Karlsson & Vinaya Manchaiah. (2023) Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Hearing Aid Benefit and Satisfaction: Content Validity and Readability. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, pages 1-20.
Crossref
Richard Windle, Harvey Dillon & Antje Heinrich. (2023) A review of auditory processing and cognitive change during normal ageing, and the implications for setting hearing aids for older adults. Frontiers in Neurology 14.
Crossref
Erik Jorgensen, Jingjing Xu, Octav Chipara, Jacob Oleson, Jason Galster & Yu-Hsiang Wu. (2022) Auditory Environments and Hearing Aid Feature Activation Among Younger and Older Listeners in an Urban and Rural Area. Ear & Hearing 44:3, pages 603-618.
Crossref
Niels Overby, Torsten Dau & Tobias May. (2023) A Data-driven Distance Metric for Evaluating the effects of Dynamic Range Compression in Adverse Conditions. Trends in Hearing 27.
Crossref
Jerker Rönnberg, Carine Signoret, Josefine Andin & Emil Holmer. (2022) The cognitive hearing science perspective on perceiving, understanding, and remembering language: The ELU model. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Yi Zhang, Jing Chen, Yanmei Zhang, Baoxuan Sun & Yuhe Liu. (2022) Using Auditory Characteristics to Select Hearing Aid Compression Speeds for Presbycusic Patients. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 14.
Crossref
Helen Henshaw, Antje Heinrich, Ashana Tittle & Melanie Ferguson. (2022) Cogmed Training Does Not Generalize to Real-World Benefits for Adult Hearing Aid Users: Results of a Blinded, Active-Controlled Randomized Trial. Ear & Hearing 43:3, pages 741-763.
Crossref
Varsha Rallapalli, Gregory Ellis & Pamela Souza. (2021) Effects of Directionality, Compression, and Working Memory on Speech Recognition. Ear & Hearing 42:3, pages 492-505.
Crossref
Jerker Rönnberg, Emil Holmer & Mary Rudner. (2021) Cognitive Hearing Science: Three Memory Systems, Two Approaches, and the Ease of Language Understanding Model. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 64:2, pages 359-370.
Crossref
Raul Sanchez-Lopez, Michal Fereczkowski, Sébastien Santurette, Torsten Dau & Tobias Neher. (2021) Towards Auditory Profile-Based Hearing-Aid Fitting: Fitting Rationale and Pilot Evaluation. Audiology Research 11:1, pages 10-21.
Crossref
Yu-Hsiang Wu, Elizabeth Stangl, Octav Chipara, Anna Gudjonsdottir, Jacob Oleson & Ruth Bentler. (2020) Comparison of In-Situ and Retrospective Self-Reports on Assessing Hearing Aid Outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 31:10, pages 746-762.
Crossref
Marina Salorio-Corbetto, Thomas Baer, Michael A. Stone & Brian C. J. Moore. (2020) Effect of the number of amplitude-compression channels and compression speed on speech recognition by listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147:3, pages 1344-1358.
Crossref
Mengfan Wu, Raul Sanchez-Lopez, Mouhamad El-Haj-Ali, Silje G. Nielsen, Michal Fereczkowski, Torsten Dau, Sébastien Santurette & Tobias Neher. (2020) Investigating the Effects of Four Auditory Profiles on Speech Recognition, Overall Quality, and Noise Annoyance With Simulated Hearing-Aid Processing Strategies. Trends in Hearing 24, pages 233121652096086.
Crossref
Tobias May, Borys Kowalewski & Torsten Dau. 2020. The Technology of Binaural Understanding. The Technology of Binaural Understanding 763 799 .
Nitya Tiwari & Prem C. Pandey. (2019) Sliding-band dynamic range compression for use in hearing aids. International Journal of Speech Technology 22:4, pages 911-926.
Crossref
Tanya L. Arbogast, Brian C. J. Moore, Sunil Puria, Drew Dundas, Judith Brimacombe, Brent EdwardsSuzanne Carr Levy. (2019) Achieved Gain and Subjective Outcomes for a Wide-Bandwidth Contact Hearing Aid Fitted Using CAM2. Ear & Hearing 40:3, pages 741-756.
Crossref
Jake Hillyer, Elizabeth Elkins, Chantel Hazlewood, Stacey D. Watson, Julie G. Arenberg & Alexandra Parbery-Clark. (2019) Assessing Cognitive Abilities in High-Performing Cochlear Implant Users. Frontiers in Neuroscience 12.
Crossref
WycliffeK Yumba. (2019) Selected Cognitive Factors Associated with Individual Variability in Clinical Measures of Speech Recognition in Noise Amplified by Fast-Acting Compression Among Hearing Aid Users. Noise and Health 21:98, pages 7.
Crossref
Niels Søgaard Jensen, Ole Hau, Jens Brehm Bagger Nielsen, Thor Bundgaard Nielsen & Søren Vase Legarth. (2019) Perceptual Effects of Adjusting Hearing-Aid Gain by Means of a Machine-Learning Approach Based on Individual User Preference. Trends in Hearing 23, pages 233121651984741.
Crossref
Alan Wiinberg, Morten Løve JepsenBastian Epp & Torsten Dau. (2019) Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility. Ear & Hearing 40:1, pages 45-54.
Crossref
Jihaeng Jeong & Kyoungwon Lee. (2018) Changes of Non-Sense Syllabic Word Scores and Preferences as a Function of Release Time on Multi-Channel Hearing Aids. Audiology and Speech Research 14:4, pages 250-258.
Crossref
Tobias May, Borys Kowalewski & Torsten Dau. (2018) Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651879090.
Crossref
Joseph C. Mellor, Michael A. Stone & John Keane. (2018) Application of Data Mining to “Big Data” Acquired in Audiology: Principles and Potential. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651877681.
Crossref
Joseph Mellor, Michael A. Stone & John Keane. (2018) Application of Data Mining to a Large Hearing-Aid Manufacturer’s Dataset to Identify Possible Benefits for Clinicians, Manufacturers, and Users. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651877363.
Crossref
Pamela E. Souza. (2018) Cognition and Hearing Aids: What Should Clinicians Know?. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 3:6, pages 43-50.
Crossref
Woojae Han, Junghak Lee, Jinsook Kim, Kyeongwon Lee & Dongwook Kim. (2017) Preferred Compression Threshold and Release Time in Quiet and Noisy Conditions for Elderly Korean Hearing Aid Users. Journal of Audiology and Otology 21:3, pages 133-139.
Crossref
Jing Xia, Sridhar Kalluri, Christophe Micheyl & Ervin Hafter. (2017) Continued search for better prediction of aided speech understanding in multi-talker environments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142:4, pages 2386-2399.
Crossref
Wycliffe Kabaywe Yumba. (2017) Cognitive Processing Speed, Working Memory, and the Intelligibility of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Persons with Hearing Impairment. Frontiers in Psychology 8.
Crossref
Joshua M. Alexander & Varsha Rallapalli. (2017) Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142:2, pages 908-923.
Crossref
Aaron C. Moberly, Michael S. Harris, Lauren Boyce & Susan Nittrouer. (2017) Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60:4, pages 1046-1061.
Crossref
Ying-Hui Lai, Fei Chen & Yu Tsao. 2017. Emerging Technology and Architecture for Big-data Analytics. Emerging Technology and Architecture for Big-data Analytics 191 214 .
Sherri L. SmithM. Kathleen Pichora-FullerGenevieve Alexander. (2016) Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology. Ear & Hearing 37:6, pages e360-e376.
Crossref
Steffen Kortlang, Giso Grimm, Volker Hohmann, Birger Kollmeier & Stephan D. Ewert. (2016) Auditory Model-Based Dynamic Compression Controlled by Subband Instantaneous Frequency and Speech Presence Probability Estimates. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 24:10, pages 1759-1772.
Crossref
Jani A. Johnson, Jingjing Xu & Robyn M. Cox. (2016) Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort. Ear & Hearing 37:5, pages 529-540.
Crossref
Sandra Gordon-Salant & Stacey Samuels Cole. (2016) Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing. Ear & Hearing 37:5, pages 593-602.
Crossref
M. Kathleen Pichora-FullerSophia E. KramerMark A. EckertBrent EdwardsBenjamin W.Y. HornsbyLarry E. HumesUlrike LemkeThomas LunnerMohan MatthenCarol L. MackersieGraham NaylorNatalie A. PhillipsMichael RichterMary RudnerMitchell S. SommersKelly L. TremblayArthur Wingfield. (2016) Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL). Ear & Hearing 37:1, pages 5S-27S.
Crossref
Brian C. J. Moore & Aleksander Sęk. (2016) Preferred Compression Speed for Speech and Music and Its Relationship to Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure. Trends in Hearing 20, pages 233121651664048.
Crossref
Stefan Launer, Justin A. Zakis & Brian C. J. Moore. 2016. Hearing Aids. Hearing Aids 93 130 .
Gerald R. Popelka & Brian C. J. Moore. 2016. Hearing Aids. Hearing Aids 323 333 .
Pamela Souza, Kathryn Arehart & Tobias Neher. (2015) Working Memory and Hearing Aid Processing: Literature Findings, Future Directions, and Clinical Applications. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Crossref
Ying-Hui Lai, Yu Tsao & Fei Chen. (2015) Effects of Adaptation Rate and Noise Suppression on the Intelligibility of Compressed-Envelope Based Speech. PLOS ONE 10:7, pages e0133519.
Crossref
Kathryn Hopkins. 2015. The Human Auditory System - Fundamental Organization and Clinical Disorders. The Human Auditory System - Fundamental Organization and Clinical Disorders 479 494 .
Tobias Neher. (2014) Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8.
Crossref
Il Joon MoonSung Hwa Hong. (2014) What Is Temporal Fine Structure and Why Is It Important?. Korean Journal of Audiology 18:1, pages 1.
Crossref
Phyu P. Khing, Brett A. Swanson & Eliathamby Ambikairajah. (2013) The Effect of Automatic Gain Control Structure and Release Time on Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility. PLoS ONE 8:11, pages e82263.
Crossref
Zhangli Chen & Guangshu Hu. (2013) CHENFIT-AMP, A Nonlinear Fitting and Amplification Strategy for Cochlear Hearing Loss. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 60:11, pages 3226-3237.
Crossref
Andrew T. Sabin, Frederick J. Gallun & Pamela E. Souza. (2013) Acoustical correlates of performance on a dynamic range compression discrimination task. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134:3, pages 2136-2147.
Crossref
Helen Henshaw & Melanie A Ferguson. (2013) Working memory training for adult hearing aid users: study protocol for a double-blind randomized active controlled trial. Trials 14:1, pages 417.
Crossref
Tom Francart & Hugh McDermott. (2012) Speech Perception and Localisation with SCORE Bimodal: A Loudness Normalisation Strategy for Combined Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Stimulation. PLoS ONE 7:10, pages e45385.
Crossref
Kathryn Hopkins, Andrew King & Brian C. J. Moore. (2012) The effect of compression speed on intelligibility: Simulated hearing-aid processing with and without original temporal fine structure information. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132:3, pages 1592-1601.
Crossref
Jerker Rönnberg, Mary Rudner & Thomas Lunner. (2011) Cognitive Hearing Science. Trends in Amplification 15:3, pages 140-148.
Crossref
Brian C. J. Moore, Christian Füllgrabe & Michael A. Stone. (2011) Determination of Preferred Parameters for Multichannel Compression Using Individually Fitted Simulated Hearing Aids and Paired Comparisons. Ear & Hearing 32:5, pages 556-568.
Crossref
Karolina Smeds & Arne Leijon. 2011. Loudness. Loudness 223 259 .
Jennifer Aydelott, Robert Leech & Jennifer Crinion. (2011) Normal Adult Aging and the Contextual Influences Affecting Speech and Meaningful Sound Perception. Trends in Amplification 14:4, pages 218-232.
Crossref
Michael A. Stone, Christian Füllgrabe & Brian C. J. Moore. (2010) Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128:4, pages 2127-2137.
Crossref
Brian C. J. Moore & Christian Füllgrabe. (2010) Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF Method for Fitting Hearing Aids With Multichannel Amplitude Compression. Ear & Hearing 31:5, pages 657-666.
Crossref
Ryan E. Scheidt, Sushrut Kale & Michael G. Heinz. (2010) Noise-induced hearing loss alters the temporal dynamics of auditory-nerve responses. Hearing Research 269:1-2, pages 23-33.
Crossref
Patrick C. M. Wong, Marc Ettlinger, John P. Sheppard, Geshri M. Gunasekera & Sumitrajit Dhar. (2010) Neuroanatomical Characteristics and Speech Perception in Noise in Older Adults. Ear & Hearing 31:4, pages 471-479.
Crossref
Brian C. J. Moore, Christian Füllgrabe & Michael A. Stone. (2010) Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128:1, pages 360-371.
Crossref
Jani A. Johnson, Robyn M. Cox & Genevieve C. Alexander. (2010) Development of APHAB Norms for WDRC Hearing Aids and Comparisons with Original Norms. Ear & Hearing 31:1, pages 47-55.
Crossref
THOMAS LUNNER, MARY RUDNER & JERKER RÖNNBERG. (2009) Cognition and hearing aids. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50:5, pages 395-403.
Crossref
Evelyn Davies-Venn, Pamela Souza, Marc Brennan & G Christopher Stecker. (2009) Effects of Audibility and Multichannel Wide Dynamic Range Compression on Consonant Recognition for Listeners with Severe Hearing Loss. Ear & Hearing 30:5, pages 494-504.
Crossref
Gitte Keidser, David Hartley & Lyndal Carter. (2008) Long-Term Usage of Modern Signal Processing by Listeners With Severe or Profound Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Survey. American Journal of Audiology 17:2, pages 136-146.
Crossref
Lu-Feng Shi & Karen A. Doherty. (2008) Subjective and Objective Effects of Fast and Slow Compression on the Perception of Reverberant Speech in Listeners With Hearing Loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51:5, pages 1328-1340.
Crossref
Brian C. J. Moore. (2008) The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences. Trends in Amplification 12:2, pages 103-112.
Crossref
Michael A. Akeroyd. (2008) Stuart Gatehouse: A Brief Life. Trends in Amplification 12:2, pages 67-75.
Crossref
Dianne J. Van TasellHarry Levitt. (2008) Stuart Gatehouse: The International Perspective. Trends in Amplification 12:2, pages 80-84.
Crossref
William Noble. (2008) Auditory Reality and Self-Assessment of Hearing. Trends in Amplification 12:2, pages 113-120.
Crossref
Judy R. Dubno, Jayne B. Ahlstrom & Amy R. Horwitz. (2008) Binaural Advantage for Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51:2, pages 539-556.
Crossref
Justin A. Zakis, Harvey Dillon & Hugh J. McDermott. (2007) The Design and Evaluation of a Hearing Aid with Trainable Amplification Parameters. Ear & Hearing 28:6, pages 812-830.
Crossref
Lauren Calandruccio, Karen A. Doherty, Laurel H. Carney & Harshavardhana N. Kikkeri. (2007) Perception of Temporally Processed Speech by Listeners with Hearing Impairment. Ear & Hearing 28:4, pages 512-523.
Crossref
Brian C.J. Moore. 2007. Cochlear Hearing Loss. Cochlear Hearing Loss 287 326 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.