Search in:

International Journal of Audiology Volume 57, 2018 - Issue 9

Submit an article Journal homepage

797

Views

CrossRef citations to date

Altmetric

Original Article

Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits

Gavin BidelmanInstitute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA; ;School of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA; ;Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN, USACorrespondence[email protected] [email protected]

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1821-3261

Louise PowersSchool of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA;

Pages 665-672 | Received 15 Jan 2018, Accepted 15 Apr 2018, Published online: 15 May 2018

Cite this article
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1470338
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Reprints & Permissions

Citations (22)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Articles from other publishers (22)

Rose Rizzi & Gavin M Bidelman. (2023) Duplex perception reveals brainstem auditory representations are modulated by listeners’ ongoing percept for speech. Cerebral Cortex.
Crossref

Carlos Jurado, Marcelo Larrea, Juan Vizuete, Mabel Torres, Christiam Garzón, Alberto Rodriguez & Torsten Marquardt. (2023) Infrasound tones at sensation threshold level elicit measurable Frequency-Following responses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 154:1, pages 50-53.
Crossref

Can Xu, Fan-Yin Cheng, Sarah Medina, Erica Eng, René Gifford & Spencer Smith. (2023) Objective discrimination of bimodal speech using frequency following responses. Hearing Research, pages 108853.
Crossref

Jared A. Carter & Gavin M. Bidelman. (2023) Perceptual warping exposes categorical representations for speech in human brainstem responses. NeuroImage 269, pages 119899.
Crossref

Vijayalakshmi Easwar & Lauren Chung. (2022) The influence of phoneme contexts on adaptation in vowel‐evoked envelope following responses. European Journal of Neuroscience 56:5, pages 4572-4582.
Crossref

Chandan H. Suresh & Ananthanarayan Krishnan. (2022) Frequency-Following Response to Steady-State Vowel in Quiet and Background Noise Among Marching Band Participants With Normal Hearing. American Journal of Audiology 31:3, pages 719-736.
Crossref

Vijayalakshmi Easwar, David Purcell, Maaike Van Eeckhoutte & Steven J. Aiken. (2022) The Influence of Male- and Female-Spoken Vowel Acoustics on Envelope-Following Responses. Seminars in Hearing 43:03, pages 223-239.
Crossref

Rui Sun, Martin Bouchard & Hilmi R. Dajani. (2022) Biometric Classification of Frequency Following Responses to English Vowels. Biometric Classification of Frequency Following Responses to English Vowels.

L. Chauvette, P. Fournier & A. Sharp. (2022) The frequency-following response to assess the neural representation of spectral speech cues in older adults. Hearing Research 418, pages 108486.
Crossref

Vijayalakshmi Easwar, Jen Birstler, Adrienne Harrison, Susan ScollieDavid Purcell. (2022) The Influence of Sensation Level on Speech-Evoked Envelope Following Responses. Ear & Hearing 43:1, pages 250-254.
Crossref

Bharath Chandrasekaran, Rachel Tessmer & G. Nike Gnanateja. 2022. Speech Perception. Speech Perception 13 44 .

Florine L. Bachmann, Ewen N. MacDonald & Jens Hjortkjær. (2021) Neural Measures of Pitch Processing in EEG Responses to Running Speech. Frontiers in Neuroscience 15.
Crossref

Bhanu Shukla & Gavin M. Bidelman. (2021) Enhanced brainstem phase-locking in low-level noise reveals stochastic resonance in the frequency-following response (FFR). Brain Research 1771, pages 147643.
Crossref

Vijayalakshmi Easwar, Sriram Boothalingam & Regan Flaherty. (2021) Fundamental frequency-dependent changes in vowel-evoked envelope following responses. Hearing Research 408, pages 108297.
Crossref

Jana Van Canneyt, Jan Wouters & Tom Francart. (2021) Neural tracking of the fundamental frequency of the voice: The effect of voice characteristics. European Journal of Neuroscience 53:11, pages 3640-3653.
Crossref

Vijayalakshmi Easwar, Emma Bridgwater & David Purcell. (2021) The Influence of Vowel Identity, Vowel Production Variability, and Consonant Environment on Envelope Following Responses. Ear & Hearing 42:3, pages 662-672.
Crossref

Caitlin N. Price & Deborah Moncrieff. (2021) Defining the Role of Attention in Hierarchical Auditory Processing. Audiology Research 11:1, pages 112-128.
Crossref

Ning Guo, Xiaopeng Si, Yang Zhang, Yue Ding, Wenjing Zhou, Dan Zhang & Bo Hong. (2021) Speech frequency-following response in human auditory cortex is more than a simple tracking. NeuroImage 226, pages 117545.
Crossref

Jana Van Canneyt, Jan Wouters & Tom Francart. (2020) From modulated noise to natural speech: The effect of stimulus parameters on the envelope following response. Hearing Research 393, pages 107993.
Crossref

Gavin M. Bidelman & Shaum Bhagat. (2020) Brainstem correlates of cochlear nonlinearity measured via the scalp-recorded frequency-following response.. NeuroReport 31:10, pages 702-707.
Crossref

Yaqing Su & Bertrand Delgutte. (2019) Pitch of harmonic complex tones: rate and temporal coding of envelope repetition rate in inferior colliculus of unanesthetized rabbits. Journal of Neurophysiology 122:6, pages 2468-2485.
Crossref

Tom A. Campbell & John E. Marsh. (2019) On corticopetal–corticofugal loops of the new early filter. NeuroReport 30:3, pages 202-206.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits

Articles from other publishers (22)

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Response properties of the human frequency-following response (FFR) to speech and non-speech sounds: level dependence, adaptation and phase-locking limits

Citations (22)

Articles from other publishers (22)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date