205
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Judges' Risk Communication Preferences in Risk for Future Violence Cases

, &
Pages 185-194 | Published online: 17 Feb 2012

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (4)

Madison F. E. Almond, Alana N. Cook & Jennifer E. Storey. (2021) The Consideration of Indigenous Peoples in High Stakes Evaluations of Risk. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 20:2, pages 150-164.
Read now
Ashley B. Batastini$suffix/text()$suffix/text(), Camden E. Hoeffner$suffix/text()$suffix/text(), Michael J. Vitacco$suffix/text()$suffix/text(), Robert D. Morgan$suffix/text()$suffix/text(), Lauren C. Coaker$suffix/text()$suffix/text() & Michael E. Lester$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (2019) Does the Format of the Message Affect What Is Heard? A Two-Part Study on the Communication of Violence Risk Assessment Data. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice 19:1, pages 44-71.
Read now
JenniferE. Storey, ValerieJ. Campbell & StephenD. Hart. (2013) Expert Evidence About Violence Risk Assessment: A Study of Canadian Legal Decisions. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 12:4, pages 287-296.
Read now
DanielC. Murrie, MarcusT. Boccaccini, Wendy McCoy & DeweyG. Cornell. (2007) Diagnostic Labeling in Juvenile Court: How Do Descriptions of Psychopathy and Conduct Disorder Influence Judges?. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 36:2, pages 228-241.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (17)

Samantha A. Zottola, Sarah L. Desmarais, D. Kamiya StewartSarah E. Duhart Clarke & John Monahan. (2023) Pretrial Risk Assessment, Release Recommendations, and Racial Bias. Criminal Justice and Behavior 50:9, pages 1255-1278.
Crossref
Neil R. Hogan & Mark E. Olver. (2021) Consistency and Construct Validity of the Five-Level System for Risk Communication Using Static and Dynamic Tools: An Investigation Using the Static-99R and VRS-SO. Assessment 30:3, pages 675-688.
Crossref
Robert J. B. Lehmann, Thomas Schäfer, L. Maaike Helmus, Julia Henniges & Monika Fleischhauer. (2023) Same Score, Different Audience, Different Message: Perceptions of Sex Offense Risk Depend on Static-99R Risk Level and Personality Factors of the Recipient. Sexual Abuse, pages 107906322211486.
Crossref
L. Maaike Helmus & Mehrnaz Peikarnegar. (2021) Perception of Risk in Intimate Partner Violence Is Influenced by Risk Scales, Perpetrator and Victim Gender, and Mental Illness Diagnosis: A Risk Communication Study With Laypeople. Partner Abuse 12:2, pages 130-157.
Crossref
Richard W. Elwood. (2019) Agreement Between Courts and SVP Evaluators in the State of Wisconsin. Criminal Justice and Behavior 46:6, pages 853-865.
Crossref
Nicholas Scurich. (2018) The case against categorical risk estimates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 36:5, pages 554-564.
Crossref
Daniel A. Krauss, Gabriel I. Cook & Lukas Klapatch. (2018) Risk assessment communication difficulties: An empirical examination of the effects of categorical versus probabilistic risk communication in sexually violent predator decisions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 36:5, pages 532-553.
Crossref
Peter SturmeyCatherine S. Shaffer, Adam J. E. Blanchard & Kevin S. Douglas. 2017. The Wiley Handbook of Violence and Aggression. The Wiley Handbook of Violence and Aggression 1 12 .
N. Zoe Hilton, Elke Ham, Kevin L. Nunes, Nicole C. Rodrigues, Cairina Frank & Michael C. Seto. (2016) Using Graphs to Improve Violence Risk Communication. Criminal Justice and Behavior 44:5, pages 678-694.
Crossref
Stephen D. Hart, Kevin S. Douglas & Laura S. Guy. 2016. The Wiley Handbook on the Theories, Assessment and Treatment of Sexual Offending. The Wiley Handbook on the Theories, Assessment and Treatment of Sexual Offending 643 666 .
Norbert Nedopil. (2015) Juristische Schwellenvorgaben, psychiatrische Diagnostik und psychopathologisches ErkennenLegal thresholds, psychiatric diagnoses and psychopathological knowledge. Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie 9:3, pages 171-178.
Crossref
N. Zoe Hilton, Nicholas Scurich & Leslie-Maaike Helmus. (2015) Communicating the Risk of Violent and Offending Behavior: Review and Introduction to this Special Issue. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 33:1, pages 1-18.
Crossref
Jennifer E. Storey, Kelly A. Watt & Stephen D. Hart. (2015) An Examination of Violence Risk Communication in Practice Using a Structured Professional Judgment Framework. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 33:1, pages 39-55.
Crossref
Daniel A. KraussNicholas Scurich. (2013) Risk Assessment in the Law: Legal Admissibility, Scientific Validity, and Some Disparities between Research and Practice. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 31:2, pages 215-229.
Crossref
Daniel J. NellerRichard I. Frederick. (2013) Classification Accuracy of Actuarial Risk Assessment Instruments. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 31:1, pages 141-153.
Crossref
Nicholas Scurich & Richard S. John. (2011) The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.. Law and Human Behavior 35:2, pages 83-91.
Crossref
Mary Alice Conroy & Daniel C. Murrie. 2007. Forensic Assessment of Violence Risk. Forensic Assessment of Violence Risk 309 352 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.