6,137
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Forensic Mental Health Practitioners’ Use of Structured Risk Assessment Instruments, Views about Bias in Risk Evaluations, and Strategies to Counteract It

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (1)

Sara K. Levin, Per Nilsen, Preben Bendtsen & Per Bülow. (2022) Risk-Increasing and Risk-Reducing Factors for Violence: A Qualitative Study of Forensic Patients’ Perceptions. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 21:4, pages 383-398.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (3)

Rasmus Rosenberg Larsen, Jessica Burns, Reba Khoshabe, Nicole Raposo, Jarkko Jalava & Stephanie Griffiths. (2022) Psychopathy assessments in forensic psychiatry: a pilot study of Canadian practitioners’ use and perceptions. Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice 9:1, pages 1-13.
Crossref
Roxana Andreea Toma, Silvia Kube, Liliana Hurezan & Rainer Banse. (2022) Predictive Validity of the Static-99R in Romania. Criminal Justice and Behavior 49:9, pages 1276-1294.
Crossref
Corine de Ruiter & Martin Hildebrand. 2022. Clinical Forensic Psychology. Clinical Forensic Psychology 479 514 .