Citations (17)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (14)
Jennifer Hawkins. (2023) Affect, Values and Problems Assessing Decision-Making Capacity. The American Journal of Bioethics 0:0, pages 1-12.
Read now
Read now
Brian D. Earp, Joanna Demaree-Cotton & Julian Savulescu. (2022) Against Externalism in Capacity Assessment—Why Apparently Harmful Treatment Refusals Should Not Be Decisive for Finding Patients Incompetent. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 65-70.
Read now
Read now
Peter Maloy Koch. (2022) Conceptual Compatibility and Transparency in Capacity Assessments. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 51-53.
Read now
Read now
Manuel Trachsel & Paul S. Appelbaum. (2022) Against Over-Protectionism: Riskier Decisions Require Clearer Evidence of Capacity But Don’t Call for Stricter Criteria. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 53-55.
Read now
Read now
Edward McArdle. (2022) Preserve Patient Autonomy; Resist Expanding the Harm Principle to Override Decisions by Competent Patients. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 84-86.
Read now
Read now
Daniel Fogal & Ben Schwan. (2022) On the Relationship between Competence and Welfare. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 73-75.
Read now
Read now
Harleen Kaur Johal, Aoife M. Finnerty & Jordan A. Parsons. (2022) “Harmful” Choices and Subjectivity: Against an Externalist Approach to Capacity Assessments. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 78-81.
Read now
Read now
Megan S. Wright. (2022) Against Externalism: Maintaining Patient Autonomy and the Right to Refuse Medical Treatment. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 58-60.
Read now
Read now
Isaac Atley. (2022) The Value of Value in Decision-Making Competence Assessments. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 81-83.
Read now
Read now
Hojjat Soofi & Anson Fehross. (2022) Determinations of Competence Ought Not to Be Primarily Grounded in Paternalistic Justifications regarding Welfare. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 75-78.
Read now
Read now
Eli G. Schantz & Mark D. Fox. (2022) The Nature of Harm: A Wine-Dark Sea. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 63-65.
Read now
Read now
David J. Satin, Marc Tunzi & Philip Day. (2022) We Don’t Offer What Can’t Be Chosen: Why Harmful Consequences Should Not Be “Decisive” in Assessing Decision-Making. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 60-62.
Read now
Read now
Leslie P. Francis, Barbara E. Bierer & Michael Ashley Stein. (2022) An Externalist, Process-Based Approach to Supported Decision-Making. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 55-58.
Read now
Read now
Johan Christiaan Bester. (2022) When Limiting Liberty, Tread Carefully: Autonomous Free Choices Should Not Be Overruled Because of the Beliefs and Values of the Decider. The American Journal of Bioethics 22:10, pages 70-72.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (3)
Akira Akabayashi, Eisuke Nakazawa & Hiroyasu Ino. (2022) Decision-Making Capacity to Refuse Treatment at the End of Life: The Need for Recognizing Real-World Practices. Clinics and Practice 12:5, pages 760-765.
Crossref
Crossref
Nuala B. Kane, Alex Ruck Keene, Gareth S. Owen & Scott Y. H. Kim. (2022) Difficult Capacity Cases—The Experience of Liaison Psychiatrists. An Interview Study Across Three Jurisdictions. Frontiers in Psychiatry 13.
Crossref
Crossref
Helen Cassidy, Adam Sims & Susanna Every-Palmer. (2022) Psychiatrists’ views on the New Zealand End of Life Choice Act. Australasian Psychiatry 30:2, pages 254-261.
Crossref
Crossref