Citations (19)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (4)
Susan R. Goldman, Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver & Eleni Α. Kyza. (2022) Collaborative Design as a Context for Teacher and Researcher Learning: Introduction to the Special Issue. Cognition and Instruction 40:1, pages 1-6.
Read now
Read now
Sittimont Kanjanabootra. (2016) Design Science method and theory in a construction and engineering context: “a phronetic tale of research”. Engineering Project Organization Journal 6:2-4, pages 64-77.
Read now
Read now
Olga Camacho Duarte, Rohan Lulham & Lucy Kaldor. (2011) Co-designing out crime. CoDesign 7:3-4, pages 155-168.
Read now
Read now
ChristopherA. Le Dantec. (2010) Situating design as social creation and cultural cognition. CoDesign 6:4, pages 207-224.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (15)
Soo Hyeon Kim & Heather Toomey Zimmerman. (2023) Serendipitous collective creativity at family making programs in public libraries. Thinking Skills and Creativity 48, pages 101283.
Crossref
Crossref
Kaustubh Ray, Breana Cappuccilli, Jacob Hunter, McKenna Eichenauer, Brandon E. Sells & Tahira Reid. (2022) Ethical Human Centered Design: Practical Approaches for Aerospace Engineering Education. Ethical Human Centered Design: Practical Approaches for Aerospace Engineering Education.
Vanessa Svihla, Yan Chen & Sung “Pil” Kang. (2022) A funds of knowledge approach to developing engineering students' design problem framing skills. Journal of Engineering Education 111:2, pages 308-337.
Crossref
Crossref
Anniina Tirronen, Tony Kinder & Jari Stenvall. (2021) Learning in Finnish Social Work Practice and Research. The British Journal of Social Work 51:7, pages 2760-2781.
Crossref
Crossref
Alma Beatriz Rivera Aguilera, Indira Ochoa Carrasco & Genoveva Vergara Mendoza. (2020) Trabajar juntas: Sistematización del diseño e impartición de un curso virtual en alfabetización informacional para docentes universitarios. Biblioteca Universitaria.
Crossref
Crossref
Anastasia K. Ostrowski, Shanna R. Daly, Aileen Huang-Saad & Colleen M. Seifert. (2020) Idea Generation Practices in a Biomedical Engineering Capstone Course. IEEE Transactions on Education 63:2, pages 118-125.
Crossref
Crossref
Keumjoo Suk & Hyunju Lee. (2019) The Conflict Resolution Behavior of Interdisciplinary Teams for Promoting a Collaborative Design Process. Archives of Design Research 32:3, pages 75-87.
Crossref
Crossref
Katja Thoring, Roland M. Mueller, Petra Badke-Schaub & Pieter Desmet. (2019) An Inventory of Creative Spaces: Innovative Organizations and their Workspace. Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design 1:1, pages 39-48.
Crossref
Crossref
Ilpo Laitinen, Tony Kinder & Jari Stenvall. (2017) Co-design and action learning in local public services. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education 24:1, pages 58-80.
Crossref
Crossref
Nicholas D. Fila & Senay Purzer. (2017) Using self-determination theory to understand engineering student motivation during innovation projects. Using self-determination theory to understand engineering student motivation during innovation projects.
Florence R. Sullivan. 2017. Robotics in STEM Education. Robotics in STEM Education
213
230
.
Todd Fernandez, Senay Purzer & Nicholas D. Fila. (2016) Using process mapping to understand engineering students' conceptions of innovation processes. Using process mapping to understand engineering students' conceptions of innovation processes.
Vanessa Svihla, Richard Reeve, Ornit Sagy & Yael Kali. (2015) A fingerprint pattern of supports for teachers’ designing of technology-enhanced learning. Instructional Science 43:2, pages 283-307.
Crossref
Crossref
Maura Borrego, Jennifer Karlin, Lisa D. McNair & Kacey Beddoes. (2013) Team Effectiveness Theory from Industrial and Organizational Psychology Applied to Engineering Student Project Teams: A Research Review. Journal of Engineering Education 102:4, pages 472-512.
Crossref
Crossref
Nicholas D. Fila, William P. Myers & Senay Purzer. (2012) Work in progress: How engineering students define innovation. Work in progress: How engineering students define innovation.