Advanced search
Publication Cover
Learning, Media and Technology Volume 33, 2008 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,217
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A study of teachers’ integration of interactive whiteboards into four Australian primary school classrooms

Sue Bennett Cognition and Learning Design Laboratory, Information and Communication Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Lori Lockyer Cognition and Learning Design Laboratory, Information and Communication Technology Research Institute, Faculty of Education, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Pages 289-300 | Received 04 Nov 2007, Accepted 16 Sep 2008, Published online: 11 Dec 2008

Citations (28)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (7)

Matthew Kearney, Sandy Schuck, Peter Aubusson & Paul F. Burke. (2018) Teachers’ technology adoption and practices: lessons learned from the IWB phenomenon. Teacher Development 22:4, pages 481-496.
Read now
Urška Fekonja-Peklaj & Ljubica Marjanovič-Umek. (2015) Positive and negative aspects of the IWB and tablet computers in the first grade of primary school: a multiple-perspective approach. Early Child Development and Care 185:6, pages 996-1015.
Read now
Bodil Sundberg, Maria Spante & Jörgen Stenlund. (2012) Disparity in practice: diverse strategies among teachers implementing interactive whiteboards into teaching practice in two Swedish primary schools. Learning, Media and Technology 37:3, pages 253-270.
Read now
Damian Maher. (2012) Teaching literacy in primary schools using an interactive whole-class technology: facilitating student-to-student whole-class dialogic interactions. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 21:1, pages 137-152.
Read now
ShannonA. Gadbois & Nicole Haverstock. (2012) Middle Years Science Teachers Voice Their First Experiences With Interactive Whiteboard Technology. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 12:1, pages 121-135.
Read now
Josh DeSantis. (2012) Getting the Most From Your Interactive Whiteboard Investment: Three Guiding Principles for Designing Effective Professional Development. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 85:2, pages 51-55.
Read now
Damian Maher. (2011) Using the multimodal affordances of the interactive whiteboard to support students’ understanding of texts. Learning, Media and Technology 36:3, pages 235-250.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (21)

Xolile Zincume & Mudaray Marimuthu. (2022) Structural Equation Modelling of Factors Influencing Users‘ Adoption of Smart Board: A South African University Perspective. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 12:3, pages 215-224.
Crossref
Mohammad D. Aldhafiri. (2020) The effectiveness of using interactive white boards in improving the Arabic listening skills of undergraduates majoring in Arabic language at Kuwaiti universities. Education and Information Technologies 25:5, pages 3577-3591.
Crossref
Carole Raby, Annie Charron, Émilie Tremblay-Wragg, Kathy Beaupré-Boivin & Stéphane Villeneuve. (2019) Apprendre à intégrer le tableau numérique interactif de manière collaborative à l’éducation préscolaire. Spirale - Revue de recherches en éducation N° 63:1, pages 65-77.
Crossref
Ahmed Hamad. (2018) Social Studies Teachers’ Perspectives on the Advantages and Challenges of Interactive Whiteboard Application in Oman. European Journal of Educational Research 7:4, pages 753-762.
Crossref
Jillian R. Powers. 2018. Teacher Training and Professional Development. Teacher Training and Professional Development 1502 1527 .
Jillian R. Powers. 2018. Handbook of Research on Human Development in the Digital Age. Handbook of Research on Human Development in the Digital Age 109 134 .
Andre Kellerman, Nicoloy Gurusinghe, Thilanga Ariyarathna & Rupert Gouws. (2018) Smart whiteboard for interactive learning. Smart whiteboard for interactive learning.
Boštjan Šumak, Maja Pušnik, Marjan Heričko & Andrej Šorgo. (2017) Differences between prospective, existing, and former users of interactive whiteboards on external factors affecting their adoption, usage and abandonment. Computers in Human Behavior 72, pages 733-756.
Crossref
M. Maněnová, M. Skutil & J. Burgerová. (2017) Analysis of Teaching Programmes for Interactive Boards. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 7:9, pages 690-693.
Crossref
Ummuhan Ormanci, Salih Cepni, Isa Deveci & Ozhan Aydin. (2015) A Thematic Review of Interactive Whiteboard Use in Science Education: Rationales, Purposes, Methods and General Knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology 24:5, pages 532-548.
Crossref
Naif Jalal & Dan Tenney. (2014) Use of SMART Table in educational institutions to enhance student learning performance. Use of SMART Table in educational institutions to enhance student learning performance.
Damian Maher. 2014. K-12 Education. K-12 Education 526 538 .
Noleine Fitzallen, Robyn Reaburn & Si FanMarissa Saville, Kim Beswick & Rosemary Callingham. 2014. The Future of Educational Research. The Future of Educational Research 203 216 .
Gary Beauchamp & Steve Kennewell. (2012) Transition in pedagogical orchestration using the interactive whiteboard. Education and Information Technologies 18:2, pages 179-191.
Crossref
Paul Warwick, Neil Mercer & Ruth Kershner. (2013) ‘Wait, let's just think about this’: Using the interactive whiteboard and talk rules to scaffold learning for co-regulation in collaborative science activities. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2:1, pages 42-51.
Crossref
Stijn Van Laer, Gary Beauchamp & Jozef Colpaert. (2012) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboards in Flemish secondary education—mapping against a transition framework. Education and Information Technologies.
Crossref
Ömer Faruk Sözcü & İsmail İpek. (2012) Instructional, Technological and Psychological Approaches of Using IWBs: A Framework. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55, pages 990-999.
Crossref
Damian Maher. 2012. Educational Stages and Interactive Learning. Educational Stages and Interactive Learning 150 162 .
Pauline Jones, Lisa Kervin & Sophie McIntosh. (2011) The interactive whiteboard: Tool and/or agent of semiotic mediation. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 34:1, pages 38-60.
Crossref
Tiffani Cameron & Sue Bennett. (2010) Learning objects in practice: The integration of reusable learning objects in primary education. British Journal of Educational Technology 41:6, pages 897-908.
Crossref
Rosalind Latiner Raby. (2009) Comparative and International Education: A Bibliography (2008). Comparative Education Review 53:S1, pages S1-S125.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.