804
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Serial and parallel processes in eye movement control: Current controversies and future directions

, &
Pages 417-428 | Received 06 Dec 2012, Accepted 09 Dec 2012, Published online: 11 Mar 2013

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

Laura J. Wakeford & Wayne S. Murray. (2020) The lexical access of multiple words during a single fixation: overlapping access processes?. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:10, pages 1435-1444.
Read now
Joshua Snell, Mathieu Declerck & Jonathan Grainger. (2018) Parallel semantic processing in reading revisited: effects of translation equivalents in bilingual readers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:5, pages 563-574.
Read now
Joshua Snell, Françoise Vitu & Jonathan Grainger. (2017) Integration of parafoveal orthographic information during foveal word reading: beyond the sub-lexical level?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 70:10, pages 1984-1996.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (15)

Yan Liu, Darko Odic, Xuyan Tang, Andy Ma, Maria Laricheva, Guanyu Chen, Sirui Wu, Man Niu, Yue Guo & Marina Milner-Bolotin. (2023) Effects of Robotics Education on Young Children’s Cognitive Development: a Pilot Study with Eye-Tracking. Journal of Science Education and Technology 32:3, pages 295-308.
Crossref
Ole Jensen, Yali Pan, Steven Frisson & Lin Wang. (2021) An oscillatory pipelining mechanism supporting previewing during visual exploration and reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25:12, pages 1033-1044.
Crossref
Mengsi Wang, Hazel I. Blythe & Simon P. Liversedge. (2021) Eye-movement control during learning and scanning of Landolt-C stimuli: Exposure frequency effects and spacing effects in a visual search task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 83:6, pages 2394-2409.
Crossref
Callum WalkerCallum Walker. 2021. An Eye-Tracking Study of Equivalent Effect in Translation. An Eye-Tracking Study of Equivalent Effect in Translation 111 180 .
Benjamin T. Carter & Steven G. Luke. (2020) Best practices in eye tracking research. International Journal of Psychophysiology 155, pages 49-62.
Crossref
Wolfgang Einhäuser, Charlotte Atzert & Antje Nuthmann. (2020) Fixation durations in natural scene viewing are guided by peripheral scene content. Journal of Vision 20:4, pages 15.
Crossref
Alex L. White, John Palmer, Geoffrey M. Boynton & Jason D. Yeatman. (2019) Parallel spatial channels converge at a bottleneck in anterior word-selective cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116:20, pages 10087-10096.
Crossref
Jason Rajsic, Jane A. Burton & Geoffrey F. Woodman. (2019) Contralateral delay activity tracks the storage of visually presented letters and words. Psychophysiology 56:1, pages e13282.
Crossref
Federico M. Federici & Callum Walker. 2018. Eye Tracking and Multidisciplinary Studies on Translation. Eye Tracking and Multidisciplinary Studies on Translation 11 29 .
Alex L. White, John Palmer & Geoffrey M. Boynton. (2018) Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition. Psychological Science 29:7, pages 1062-1071.
Crossref
Mathieu Declerck, Joshua Snell & Jonathan Grainger. (2017) On the role of language membership information during word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence from flanker-language congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25:2, pages 704-709.
Crossref
Jonathan Grainger. (2018) Orthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’ vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71:2, pages 335-359.
Crossref
Antje Nuthmann. (2016) Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24:2, pages 370-392.
Crossref
R. Calen Walshe & Antje Nuthmann. (2014) Asymmetrical control of fixation durations in scene viewing. Vision Research 100, pages 38-46.
Crossref
Sheng-Chang Chen, Hsiao-Ching She, Ming-Hua Chuang, Jiun-Yu Wu, Jie-Li Tsai & Tzyy-Ping Jung. (2014) Eye movements predict students' computer-based assessment performance of physics concepts in different presentation modalities. Computers & Education 74, pages 61-72.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.