1,051
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Comment

What p-hacking really looks like: A comment on Masicampo and LaLande (2012)

Pages 829-832 | Received 30 Sep 2014, Accepted 07 Oct 2014, Published online: 06 Dec 2014

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (2)

Nicholas David Bowman & Justin Robert Keene. (2018) A Layered Framework for Considering Open Science Practices. Communication Research Reports 35:4, pages 363-372.
Read now
Ivar Vermeulen, Camiel J. Beukeboom, Anika Batenburg, Arthur Avramiea, Dimo Stoyanov, Bob van de Velde & Dirk Oegema. (2015) Blinded by the Light: How a Focus on Statistical “Significance” May Cause p-Value Misreporting and an Excess of p-Values Just Below .05 in Communication Science. Communication Methods and Measures 9:4, pages 253-279.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (28)

Darías Holgado, Cristian Mesquida & Rafael Román-Caballero. (2023) Assessing the Evidential Value of Mental Fatigue and Exercise Research. Sports Medicine 53:12, pages 2293-2307.
Crossref
Sarah R. Schiavone & Simine Vazire. (2022) Reckoning With Our Crisis: An Agenda for the Field of Social and Personality Psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 18:3, pages 710-722.
Crossref
Jasper Brinkerink. (2021) When Shooting for the Stars Becomes Aiming for Asterisks: P -Hacking in Family Business Research . Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 47:2, pages 304-343.
Crossref
Angelika M. Stefan & Felix D. Schönbrodt. (2023) Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of p -hacking strategies . Royal Society Open Science 10:2.
Crossref
Cristian Mesquida, Jennifer Murphy, Daniël Lakens & Joe Warne. (2022) Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field. Royal Society Open Science 9:12.
Crossref
Seth Lindstromberg. (2021) P -CURVING AS A SAFEGUARD AGAINST P -HACKING IN SLA RESEARCH . Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44:4, pages 1155-1180.
Crossref
Dorota Reis & Malte Friese. 2022. Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology. Avoiding Questionable Research Practices in Applied Psychology 101 121 .
J.C.F. de Winter & D. Dodou. 2021. International Encyclopedia of Transportation. International Encyclopedia of Transportation 87 95 .
David A. Ellis. 2020. Smartphones within Psychological Science. Smartphones within Psychological Science.
Chris H. J. Hartgerink, Robbie C. M. van Aert, Michèle B. Nuijten, Jelte M. Wicherts, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen & Craig W. Gruber. 2020. The Theory of Statistics in Psychology. The Theory of Statistics in Psychology 35 50 .
Jerome Olsen, Johanna Mosen, Martin Voracek & Erich Kirchler. (2019) Research practices and statistical reporting quality in 250 economic psychology master's theses: a meta-research investigation. Royal Society Open Science 6:12, pages 190738.
Crossref
Mattia Prosperi, Jiang Bian, Iain E. Buchan, James S. Koopman, Matthew Sperrin & Mo Wang. (2019) Raiders of the lost HARK: a reproducible inference framework for big data science. Palgrave Communications 5:1.
Crossref
Edgar Erdfelder & Daniel W. Heck. (2019) Detecting Evidential Value and p -Hacking With the p -Curve Tool . Zeitschrift für Psychologie 227:4, pages 249-260.
Crossref
Kaylie A. Carbine, Hannah M. Lindsey, Rebekah E. Rodeback & Michael J. Larson. (2019) Quantifying evidential value and selective reporting in recent and 10-year past psychophysiological literature: A pre-registered P-curve analysis. International Journal of Psychophysiology 142, pages 33-49.
Crossref
Magdalena Boch, Ulrich S. Tran & Martin Voracek. (2019) Does Really One in Ten Believe Capital Punishment Exists in a Contemporary European Community Country? An Endorsed, Prereviewed, Preregistered Replication Study and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 10.
Crossref
Jukka Savolainen & Matthew VanEseltine. (2018) Replication and Research Integrity in Criminology: Introduction to the Special Issue. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 34:3, pages 236-244.
Crossref
Rolf Ulrich, Jeff Miller & Edgar Erdfelder. (2018) Effect Size Estimation From t -Statistics in the Presence of Publication Bias . Zeitschrift für Psychologie 226:1, pages 56-80.
Crossref
Samantha F. Anderson, Ken Kelley & Scott E. Maxwell. (2017) Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty. Psychological Science 28:11, pages 1547-1562.
Crossref
Lisa M. Oakes. (2017) Sample Size, Statistical Power, and False Conclusions in Infant Looking-Time Research. Infancy 22:4, pages 436-469.
Crossref
Chris H.J. Hartgerink. (2017) Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread p -hacking . PeerJ 5, pages e3068.
Crossref
Arnaud Vaganay. (2016) Outcome Reporting Bias in Government-Sponsored Policy Evaluations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of 13 Studies. PLOS ONE 11:9, pages e0163702.
Crossref
Robbie C. M. van Aert, Jelte M. Wicherts & Marcel A. L. M. van Assen. (2016) Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values . Perspectives on Psychological Science 11:5, pages 713-729.
Crossref
Miguel A. Vadillo, Natalie Gold & Magda Osman. (2016) The Bitter Truth About Sugar and Willpower. Psychological Science 27:9, pages 1207-1214.
Crossref
Chris H.J. Hartgerink, Robbie C.M. van Aert, Michèle B. Nuijten, Jelte M. Wicherts & Marcel A.L.M. van Assen. (2016) Distributions of p -values smaller than .05 in psychology: what is going on? . PeerJ 4, pages e1935.
Crossref
Dorothy V.M. Bishop & Paul A. Thompson. (2016) Problems in using p -curve analysis and text-mining to detect rate of p -hacking and evidential value . PeerJ 4, pages e1715.
Crossref
Stephan B. Bruns & John P. A. Ioannidis. (2016) p-Curve and p-Hacking in Observational Research. PLOS ONE 11:2, pages e0149144.
Crossref
Daniël Lakens. (2015) On the challenges of drawing conclusions from p -values just below 0.05 . PeerJ 3, pages e1142.
Crossref
Michèle B. Nuijten, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen, Coosje L. S. Veldkamp & Jelte M. Wicherts. (2015) The Replication Paradox: Combining Studies can Decrease Accuracy of Effect Size Estimates. Review of General Psychology 19:2, pages 172-182.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.