Clinical controversies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of four important but controversial aspects of acute pulmonary embolism management that are still subject of debate and research

Dieuwke Luijtena Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4776-0587 View further author information

Frederikus A Kloka Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-0754 View further author information

Thijs E van Mensa Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands;b Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6520-1597 View further author information

Menno V Huismana Department of Medicine – Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1423-5348 View further author information

Clinical controversies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of four important but controversial aspects of acute pulmonary embolism management that are still subject of debate and research

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Clinical controversies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of four important but controversial aspects of acute pulmonary embolism management that are still subject of debate and research

Citations (1)

Read on this site (1)

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date