139
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic Review-Treatment

Facilitated communication is contraindicated as a treatment choice; a meta-analysis is still to be doneFootnote1

&
Pages 81-83 | Published online: 12 Aug 2008

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (4)

Ralf W. Schlosser, Susan Balandin, Bronwyn Hemsley, Teresa Iacono, Paul Probst & Stephen von Tetzchner. (2014) Facilitated Communication and Authorship: A Systematic Review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 30:4, pages 359-368.
Read now
Scott O. Lilienfeld, Julia Marshall, James T. Todd & Howard C. Shane. (2014) The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 8:2, pages 62-101.
Read now
Mark P. Mostert. (2012) Facilitated communication: The empirical imperative to prevent further professional malpractice. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 6:1, pages 18-27.
Read now
Ralf W. Schlosser & Jeff Sigafoos. (2009) Navigating Evidence-Based Information Sources in Augmentative and Alternative Communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 25:4, pages 225-235.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (4)

Simona Hlaváčová. (2021) Evidence-based Practice in Speech and Language Pathology. Listy klinické logopedie 5:2, pages 22-29.
Crossref
Jennifer B. Ganz, Antonis Katsiyannis & Kristi L. Morin. (2017) Facilitated Communication: The Resurgence of a Disproven Treatment for Individuals With Autism. Intervention in School and Clinic 54:1, pages 52-56.
Crossref
Bronwyn Hemsley, Lucy Bryant, Ralf W Schlosser, Howard C Shane, Russell Lang, Diane Paul, Meher Banajee & Marie Ireland. (2018) Systematic review of facilitated communication 2014–2018 finds no new evidence that messages delivered using facilitated communication are authored by the person with disability. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 3, pages 239694151882157.
Crossref
Arlene McCurtin & Hazel Roddam. (2011) Evidence‐based practice: SLTs under siege or opportunity for growth? The use and nature of research evidence in the profession. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 47:1, pages 11-26.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.